2024 List Bitcoin Mixers Bitcoin Tumblers Websites

[mocacinno]

Looking to track a new way scammers are exploring

Does anyone know what the following syntax means exactly

Code:

/^https?:\/\/[0-9a-z]*\.?[-0-9a-z]{4,}\.[a-z]{2,11}\/(?:[0-9a-z]{6,8}\/)?\/?\?u=[0-9a-z]{7}&o=[0-9a-z]{7}/$document,match-case

^ is the start of a string
[0-9a-z] to match any character from a-z or 0-9
[a-z]{2,11} to match any character from a-z  but the length range must between 2 to 11
$ is the end of the string

but I'm confused with <$document,match-case>, especially at the end of a string.
That's something related to Python, but I don't get what's it's supposed to match. I mean obviously a document, but how you can "match case" a document in a url opened in a browser (or a list)?

Not even sure if I'm clear

I've worked with regex'es quite often, but i've never seen document,match-case at the end of a regex tbh... I'm wondering if `$document,match-case` is something that has been copied from somewhere else???

How i would read this regex:
/ => delimiter
^ => starts with
http => the literal string `http`
s? => zero or one `s` (so the regex will work for http:// and https://
:\/\/ => the literal string `://`
[0-9a-z]* => 0 to unlimited lowercase alphanumeric characters
\.? => zero or one dot
[-0-9a-z]{4,} => at least 4 alphanumeric lowercase characters OR dashes
\. => the literal string `.`
[a-z]{2,11} => between 2 and 11 lowercase letters
\/ => the literal string `/`
(?: => optional non capturing matchgroup start
[0-9a-z]{6,8} => between 6 and 8 lowercase alphanumeric characters
\/ => the literal string `/`
)? => optional match group end
\/? => the literal string `/` or nothing (``)
\?u= => the literal string `?u=`
[0-9a-z]{7} => exactly 7 lowercase alphanumeric characters
&o= => the literal string `&o=`
[0-9a-z]{7} => exactly 7 lowercase alphanumeric characters
/ => delimiter


$document,match-case => a piece of code, text,... that was accidentally pasted after the regex... Sure, $ demarks the end of the string, but it belongs inside the delimiter not outside

An interesting online free no-signup tool i use quite often when decypering (or creating) complex regexes is https://regex101.com/...

So, if you leave out $document,match-case, the regex would match things like

Code:

http://soijsdf545.0sjkhlzef5.sfze/slidsjz/?u=1234567&o=1234567
https://lsiflz-sltlxis.cn/?u=1234567&o=1234567

[1714464295]

1714464295

[1714464295]

1714464295

[1714464295]

1714464295

[1714464295]

1714464295

[FatFork]

but I'm confused with <$document,match-case>, especially at the end of a string.
That's something related to Python, but I don't get what's it's supposed to match. I mean obviously a document, but how you can "match case" a document in a url opened in a browser (or a list)?

Not even sure if I'm clear

The <$document,match-case> part at the end is not standard syntax for regular expressions in Python. It could be specific to a certain scripting context or library that the script is using. The "match-case" might indicate that the match should be case-sensitive. Do you have the complete source script from which that line was extracted?

[LeGaulois]

Thanks both

I could post a few links but your security could be at risk.

But let's use another way.
I found a similar thing at chrome-extension://cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm/asset-viewer.html?url=ublock-badware

what about for example

$doc
$doc,match-case,domain=
$doc,domain=biz

$doc and $document could be the same thing?

[FatFork]

I found a similar thing at chrome-extension://cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm/asset-viewer.html?url=ublock-badware

If it's from a browser extension, then the code is in JavaScript. When I see '$doc' or '$document', my mind goes to variables or objects since I'm more of a PHP guy.  

In JavaScript, when you see something like $doc or $document, it usually refers to an object that represents the web page's document. It's a common convention to use a dollar sign to indicate that it's related to the DOM (Document Object Model) in the context of browser scripting. But I'm not too familiar with JavaScript syntax myself, so maybe someone else can explain better.

pinging @TryNinja


PS: Take a look at this. [banned mixer] seems to have changed their onion address a few months ago, so it would be a good idea to update the url in the first post. The new Tor url is: http://[banned mixer]/

[ZeeshanTrade]

I think that the best way to mix an altcoin is to do atomic swap with XMR.

Can you tell the exact link where we can do this atomic swap with XMR ?

[Charles-Tim]

Can you tell the exact link where we can do this atomic swap with XMR ?

If it is bitcoin that want want to mix with monero, according to the thread that you created about it, I will still advice you to use Mixero if you can pay the fee of 1.9%.




By default, it would be coinjoin, you will have to click on advanced, to change it to advanced mixing which makes use of converting your bitcoin to monero and back to bitcoin.

/faqs]Our advanced mode uses a rare method of mixing in the world of cryptocurrencies, called swapping which involves exchanging funds from BTC to XMR and back to BTC. The process uses automatically generated wallets that are not linked to any exchange, making it extremely difficult to trace the transactions.

Alternatively, you can use a decentralized exchange like Bisq. On Bisq, there is ETH/BTC pair as well.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Can you tell the exact link where we can do this atomic swap with XMR ?

I was having the impression it was possible to do it, beyond with bitcoin. But as far as my search engine goes, it isn't. You'll have to find an intermediary to do the ALT <-> XMR swap, such as FixedFloat. There may be decentralized exchanges, but I doubt it'll be cheaper, as there's very little volume for altcoins.

By default, it would be coinjoin

That's actually smart, because the bitcoin outputs signal it is a mixer, and that's good because anyone tracing your coins can be certain that they've changed hands. The smart part is that not even the mixer knows where they are.

Alternatively, you can use a decentralized exchange like Bisq. On Bisq, there is ETH/BTC pair as well.

Yes, but ETH has very little volume, let alone other altcoins.

[FatFork]

LeGaulois, it appears Blindmixer bit the dust! Their domain seems to have expired, so you should remove it from the list, at least for the time being.

This domain has expired. Is this your domain?
Renew Now!

archived

[LeGaulois]

⭐Name: Mixer1.money
🔹Clearnet link: https://mixer1.money

Humm...

The website is now redirecting to https://[banned mixer]/

And [banned mixer] was an old mixer (a topic can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1725308.0)
The whois hasn't changed since
Registered On2021-12-20
Updated On2023-02-03

Mixer1.money=[banned mixer].
I see no problem with it since "I trust" who asked me to list mixer1.money, but I wonder what's the idea behind

@FatFork
I removed blindmixer.com
TYVM

[Bitcoin_Arena]

And [banned mixer] was an old mixer (a topic can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1725308.0)
The whois hasn't changed since
Registered On2021-12-20
Updated On2023-02-03

I wonder how this is possible yet the Wayback Machine archive shows that the domain existed way before 2021 - https://web.archive.org/web/20170921025750/https://[banned mixer]/
I always had a perception that once a domain name is registered, sites like whois only recognize the first date it was registered.

And now what we see is the 2 domains were registered in 2021, one in September, the other in December. Could it mean the old mixer collapsed and someone new bought off both domains?

The old mixer also said this on their site "bitcoin mixer 2.0"

[icopress]

Could it mean the old mixer collapsed and someone new bought off both domains?

As far as I know, it now belongs to Jambler.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

⭐Name: Thormixer
🔹Clearnet link: https://www.[banned mixer]/
🔹Tor link: amwnnncglaw27kfomeiszq4eltwkktnkdzjg6kbtjwb2w3zgysatjead.onion

Thormixer, they announced that they have a new onion address about a week ago

New Tor mirror: http://[banned mixer]

However, both onion sites are not found at the moment. The clearnet is also pretty messed up. I am being blocked, it could be happening to many other people.

[LeGaulois]

- Blindmixer.com is back, so I will add it again to the list. (look like they renewed the domain name)

- [banned mixer] is avalaible to me, on both clearnet and darkweb. I updated the onion URL because they changed it about a week ago (see here)
thanks @Bitcoin_Arena

- Mixer1.money: I changed the name to [banned mixer] and the link because
1) the domain redirection (as I posted above)
2) their provider does it too on their list

[Bitcoin_Arena]

- Blindmixer.com is back, so I will add it again to the list. (look like they renewed the domain name)

It looks like they just decided to shut down their service according to this announcement. Maybe the renewal was to let clients access the site and be able to make withdrawals.

Dear all, the current maintainers of blindmixer have decided to no longer continue.

Please withdraw your money from the current custodian before October 1 2023.

If you have issues, do not email, post them here.

Kind regards,

The deadline seems very narrow for a service where clients won't be able to get notifications about the shutdown via any channel, let say an email address.

[LeGaulois]

A new mixer is here

⭐Name: [banned mixer]
🔹Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer]
🔹Tor link: [banned mixer]
🔹Bitcointalk thread link: here
🔹Fees:  from 1% to 5% + 0.0005 BTC
🔹Minimum amount: 0.001
🔹Cloudflare/Ddos-guard.net: Yes

Interesting, something that's sadly now usual. A few hours after the service was introduced to the forum, the service started to get hit with a DDOS attack. A lot smaller attack compared to what some services got but still.
So now, if someone is launching a new mixer, he should be prepared to be DDOS'ed before coming to Bitcointalk

[examplens]

A new mixer is here

⭐Name: [banned mixer]
🔹Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer]
🔹Tor link: [banned mixer]
🔹Bitcointalk thread link: here
🔹Fees:  from 1% to 5% + 0.0005 BTC
🔹Minimum amount: 0.001
🔹Cloudflare/Ddos-guard.net: No

Interesting, something that's sadly now usual. A few hours after the service was introduced to the forum, the service started to get hit with a DDOS attack. A lot smaller attack compared to what some services got but still.
So now, if someone is launching a new mixer, he should be prepared to be DDOS'ed before coming to Bitcointalk

Judging by what was written from the official [banned mixer] forum account, it seems that it was just some kind of stress test. I hope that's all because as far as I can see, everything is working fine with them now.

First of all, I would like to say a big thank you for the stress test!

15836600 requests, it turns out we have competition... at first glance there wasn't any  

[LeGaulois]

I posted a wrong information, [banned mixer] is using DDoS-Guard.net, and since the begining. (shame on me)

Stress test doesn't really exist, if I can say. Attackers know the limits they can push. They're used to ddos websites since it's their business.
There isn't really any use to test a website when you know it is using DDoS-Guard.

(As I've already mentionned before), this tendancy to attack bitcoin mixers is now here since the closure of Chipmixer. I probably can say that all mixers created since then have been attacked (often from the day 1).
Not that DDOS & co didn't exist before but it used to be different. Mixers were bombed from time to time, but not like this, and not with new sites either.

The number of attacking IPs is low to me. [banned mixer] was bombed with over 100,000 IPs, and not only that.
Either the attacker is on a low budget or is a newbie in ddos'ing websites.

[DepingCD]

Which mixer is the most reliable and trusted now? If I had to mix large amount what would be the best choice?

[Charles-Tim]

Which mixer is the most reliable and trusted now? If I had to mix large amount what would be the best choice?

Go to the OP and choose the one that is (or the ones) that are best for you. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827109.0

Advice:
You do not necessarily have to use a single mixer for mixing all your coins. You can divide the coin and use different mixers for it. Or divide it and use the same mixer to mix it one after the other.

[LeGaulois]

Which mixer is the most reliable and trusted now? If I had to mix large amount what would be the best choice?

The one advertised on my profile  

To give an answer, difficult to choose who's the best, it depends on your needs too. All I can say is [banned mixer], [banned mixer], [banned mixer], Coinnomize.biz are the oldest mixers around with tracking records. Of course, to be a new mixer doesn't mean to be a bad one. After all, every business starts from zero, every business deserves a chance.

For a large amount, I would probably use more than one mixer, but for sure I wouldn't send a large amount in 1 shot.

(note: you can get a free trial with [banned mixer] @ https://[banned mixer]/?mix=free)
(note: Don't trust blogs reviews, YT videos and so on)