skoobz65
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 01, 2018, 04:19:20 PM |
|
Maybe we have a great FAIL?
Its hard to start new coin. Devs are working. I believe this project. its not a shit coin among many others shits. We agree, I do not want to throw shit at this project that seems to have a good future if these small problems are solved I agree also . It has an amazing functioning idea , an actually working idea lol ... not a promise . They do their best as support . Now find me a 40 million dollar crypto company doing that ? , None . Now find me one that is doing it for free lol ... because they believe they got a great project ! So lets all take it easy on them ! Am sure they didn't plan on having unprofessional individuals trying to fork and clog their network . what a waste of hashing power . |
|
|
|
|
crypt0b1t
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 1
|
|
February 01, 2018, 04:29:43 PM |
|
Maybe we have a great FAIL?
Its hard to start new coin. Devs are working. I believe this project. its not a shit coin among many others shits. We agree, I do not want to throw shit at this project that seems to have a good future if these small problems are solved I agree also . It has an amazing functioning idea , an actually working idea lol ... not a promise . They do their best as support . Now find me a 40 million dollar crypto company doing that ? , None . Now find me one that is doing it for free lol ... because they believe they got a great project ! So lets all take it easy on them ! Am sure they didn't plan on having unprofessional individuals trying to fork and clog their network . what a waste of hashing power . Agreed. While this is very interesting to watch from outside, pressure must be at the highest for the dev team right now, and yet they are fixing the problems as they occur and supporting everyone. Props to them! |
|
|
|
|
eliastt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 05:07:46 PM |
|
While this is very interesting to watch from outside, pressure must be at the highest for the dev team right now, and yet they are fixing the problems as they occur and supporting everyone.
Props to them!
Yep. The project seems very promising with real usage. I hope for the best. |
|
|
|
|
ThemonkiiX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 233
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 06:18:34 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ninjacointop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 07:21:40 PM |
|
blockchain Youtube + Twitch =======> IPBC.  It seems like a great project if you're keeping track of cryptocurrencies. Unfortunately, until the people know little about the cryptocurrency, the project will remain in the shadow.
|
|
|
|
|
Kolobok_UA
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 07:37:29 PM |
|
Good luck devs
|
|
|
|
|
air133
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 07:44:31 PM |
|
Very interesting project, I hope you will succeed
|
|
|
|
|
Paperboat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 07:45:31 PM |
|
Can someone tell me how I can view the balance in my IPBC paper wallet? The windows wallet doesn't work on my Windows 7 machine.
I tried adding it to my account on IPBC.io, but nothing seems to happen there.
|
|
|
|
|
visax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 09:00:33 PM |
|
I don't get the difference between pool.ipbc.io and support.ipbc.io.
Why has one pool 10% fee and the other 1%?
Why is the support pool showing a hash rate of 920kH/s while the whole network just has 670 kH/s?
The 10% fee pool is where the IPBC platform mediaplayer-miners mine to. The other is for people who want to mine for themselves with their own tools. Perhaps the calculations shown for the whole network, being calculated estimates, might be somewhat inaccurate. Pool rate should be right. same, me to i have trouble
I answered this earlier. The "-allpools 1" options ought to help you out. Hi,
I can't verify my account because I ddin't get the verification email.
Will you fix this?
Thanx
You didn't get the verification email? If we notice it being broken, we will try to fix it. Can you provide any more information, perhaps PM me the email used? wallet, not full file, what its   Seriously, this wallet must compile manual are you kidding? hi, thank to reply
i had error, when i compile and build this wallet
<snip>
im not understand, why must compile manual??
guys wallet its hard to build, how this? why not with already wallet simple??
i use os linux
If you check carefully, there are compiled linux releases located here: https://github.com/ipbc-dev/ipbc-wallet/releasesThey should work for you. Just extract, chmod +x, and run. Russian was already reserved, as noted here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15XkjMx6DL6LTBbIcfdRY_PGHscTTkdRg_7sxiocN7gk/edit?usp=sharingthe website was pretty so slow,I try to watch a movie but waiting for a long time.
I think it need more technology update.
We are working on improving everything. 10,000 reward for a 2mins block? means 300,000 an hour , 7mil a day , 216mil a month, total supply 1bil , so means in around 4-5 months all the coins will be mined?
+1 I, too, are interested in such an issue. Do not you think that this is very small? If so, why? Difficulty will increase as network hashpower increases. However, block rewards are not dependent on diff, they are calculated based on number of coins already mined. The more coins already mined, the less will be the block reward. https://github.com/ipbc-dev/ipbc/blob/master/src/CryptoNoteConfig.hWhat will be the price of IPBC when listed on livecoin?
Not exactly something I can predict, sorry. uuuh im not luckly, still like this after download and extrack and chmod +x im save on desktop file IPBC-Wallet-linux-x64-v1.0.2.0.zip 1. extrack 2. cd IPBC-Wallet 3. chmod +x IPBC-Wallet And then: ./IPBC-Wallet ./IPBC-Wallet: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_program_options.so.1.58.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Please dev, create wallet for simple on linux |
|
|
|
|
hapsal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 09:06:42 PM |
|
Dear Xavieron, explain where 652 IPBC coins disappeared
Private messages are closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoam
|
|
February 01, 2018, 09:08:46 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. |
|
|
|
|
etohjones
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 09:27:28 PM |
|
Good luck! Great project! I have been mining since yesterday and am very excited about the future of this coin!
|
|
|
|
|
icedevil
Member
Offline
Activity: 242
Merit: 10
|
|
February 01, 2018, 09:48:28 PM |
|
Good luck! Great project! I have been mining since yesterday and am very excited about the future of this coin!
Me too |
|
|
|
|
ZeFGooFy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 10:03:09 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. I do have pool and explorer working and ready to rumble, unfortunately at this very moment I don't know if I should continue development or not... |
|
|
|
|
|
Speedie
|
|
February 01, 2018, 10:28:24 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone. Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours? |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoam
|
|
February 01, 2018, 10:32:54 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours? You make a valid point. Then Dev should continue mining with Rewards set to 10000 till another 10k or 20k blocks instead of suddenly reducing it to 500. That would give a chance to everyone to get 10k rewards. |
|
|
|
|
ZeFGooFy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 10:37:25 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone. Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours? Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Speedie
|
|
February 01, 2018, 10:42:52 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone. Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours? Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it? Project was less than 24 hours old when the bug was fixed. The timestamp of the 1st post is 31st January at 8:14 AM EST. The fix was announced in post 138 on 1st February at 8:13 AM EST. |
|
|
|
|
accide
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
February 01, 2018, 10:50:14 PM |
|
I think the dev should do something to fix the impacts from the 10000 bounty bug.
This bug have given large amount of profits to early miners, however, the mining difficult now is about 40x than before. Ignoring these impacts is not a good solution.
Dev should restart the Chain and start mining from Block 1 again... To have overlooked the reward of 10000 for 1680 blocks is not correct... Diff is 40X now and Reward has cut down from 10000 to 500... This is not fair. In the grand scheme of things, for a coin with an ultimate total supply of 1 Billion, the initial error is virtually negligible. Far more damage would be done to the reputation of the project by negating the work of those who saw the potential right from the start IMHO. Who would mine it if they knew that, should a bug be discovered in future and enough people complained about it not being fair, their mining time and wallets would be wiped out on a whim? And not just those who benefited from the bug either, but everyone. Here, among the endless stream of worthless ICOs and copy/paste crap that makes up 99.9% of the Ann forum, is a project that at launch had a working product, a good whitepaper (albeit with some glaring typos), a decent website, wallets and pools ready to go, no ICO, no pre-mine, and a clear vision to be something other than a "me too" coin. You really want to risk all of that because a few people got lucky for a few hours? Lucky for a few hours? Can you please consider browsing the blockchain explorer... just for the fun of it? I totally agree with Speedie. Also, a lot of coins in which the reward with blocks decreases.. The first miners were lucky and I'm happy for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
