Retracted [re:lauda]

[Welsh]

I'd like to know what pills I'm taking as well.

Probably something to control the headaches from all the false accusations that are being thrown at you right now or should I say ever since you've been here probably by accounts directly connected to QS and if he does indeed have a source will probably be owned by him as well.

[1714879341]

1714879341

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

Hearsay.

Surely this should be very easy for Lauda to dispel this by simply denying that he has a pill addiction. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Lauda would not quickly deny that he is addicted to pills?

Instead, Lauda is wanting to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he has an addiction. All while Lauda's "friend" The Pharmacist is backing him, and preemptively saying that Lauda should be in "DT". What do you think this is an indication of?

Do you have any information about what kind of pills he is taking? Over the counter or prescription? If they are prescription drugs he might have been illegally obtaining them via the dark net or paying off pharmacists. Are you sure he is actually trying to obtain more drugs beyond his prescription if he has any? Opiates are hard to shake off anyways.

If Lauda is paying off pharmacists--which people usually don't do to get drugs, by the way--I'd like to state right now that I am in no way involved in this.  Quickseller likes to jump to cunty conclusions, and he's already leveled the accusation that Lauda and I are the same person, which I have gone through the trouble to specifically deny.  QS has a very vivid imagination and also projects his own shortdicked failings onto other people, e.g., he accuses others of employing alt accounts to bolster arguments and what have you. 

Hopefully this isn't a case of him projecting his own untoward chemical proclivities upon Lauda for purposes of reputation-smearing.  That would not surprise me in the least.

[LeGaulois]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust

Boogeyman? 👺

I have been told by at least one reputable person

Santa Claus? 🎅
.............................

Dude keep your personal attack outside the forum, this is not something related to the community's interests, nobody is interested in the personal lives of others

[Quickseller]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

Hearsay.

Surely this should be very easy for Lauda to dispel this by simply denying that he has a pill addiction. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Lauda would not quickly deny that he is addicted to pills?

Instead, Lauda is wanting to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he has an addiction. All while Lauda's "friend" The Pharmacist is backing him, and preemptively saying that Lauda should be in "DT". What do you think this is an indication of?

Do you have any information about what kind of pills he is taking? Over the counter or prescription? If they are prescription drugs he might have been illegally obtaining them via the dark net or paying off pharmacists. Are you sure he is actually trying to obtain more drugs beyond his prescription if he has any? Opiates are hard to shake off anyways.

My understanding is that Lauda uses a large percentage of his earnings from his various dealings around here to fund his drug addiction, which implies the drugs being abused are not being consumed legally.


It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

[vlom]

why are so many forums member so Lauda addicted? yes, this is the best topic to ask this questions....

All these topics in Reputation and Scam Accusations about Lauda.
Why is Lauda so important for you that you open an new topic?

Every time i am bored i eat some popcorn and visit these subforums and have some fun reading all the stuff posted there.


and an other strange thing are these lines (yes drugs again....)
________________________________________________________

do you guys think that your point is more interesting if you use lines in your posting.

 

[Lauda]

It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

Of course not. I needn't dispute anything that's based on hearsay from a basement dweller. Wake me up once there are logs or the *mysterious source* shows up.

-snip-
Why is Lauda so important for you that you open an new topic?

Every time i am bored i eat some popcorn and visit these subforums and have some fun reading all the stuff posted there.

The answer is up in my bolded part of the previous paragraph. Once they get busted, since they have no apparent life that is worth anything otherwise, they go on a vendetta.

[Quickseller]

It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

Of course not.

Well, I guess others can interpret the lack of a denial/dispute themselves.

[Lauda]

It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

Of course not.

Well, I guess others can interpret the lack of a denial/dispute themselves.

I do not have to explain myself to you should I not want to. Until there is any kind of evidence that would nullify the senselessness of this smear campaign, we can talk. Also, if you fail to provide anything in due time, I expect some other DT members to act accordingly here.

I doubt they'll be any evidence provided by your source and once the source can't show any evidence to back up the claims should probably come under investigation themselves after trying to slander someones name with malicious intent.

[Quickseller]

It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

Of course not.

Well, I guess others can interpret the lack of a denial/dispute themselves.

I do not have to explain myself to you should I not want to. Until there is any kind of evidence that would nullify the senselessness of this smear campaign, we can talk. Also, if you fail to provide anything in due time, I expect some other DT members to act accordingly here.

I doubt they'll be any evidence provided by your source and once the source can't show any evidence to back up the claims should probably come under investigation themselves after trying to slander someones name with malicious intent.

Well it is too bad that I am saying that I have a source that says you have a pill addiction. You are not disputing this claim, so it appears that based on the preponderance of the evidence presented, you have a pill addiction...

[TheUltraElite]

It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

Of course not.

Well, I guess others can interpret the lack of a denial/dispute themselves.

I do not have to explain myself to you should I not want to. Until there is any kind of evidence that would nullify the senselessness of this smear campaign, we can talk. Also, if you fail to provide anything in due time, I expect some other DT members to act accordingly here.

I doubt they'll be any evidence provided by your source and once the source can't show any evidence to back up the claims should probably come under investigation themselves after trying to slander someones name with malicious intent.

Well it is too bad that I am saying that I have a source that says you have a pill addiction. You are not disputing this claim, so it appears that based on the preponderance of the evidence presented, you have a pill addiction...

Why dont you bring out your so-called source? Fear of retribution from Lauda - if the claims are true nobody would repute them no even Lauda. Otherwise you are blatant liar and a troll which you have been for a long time now. Clarification - The pill addicted person is QS and not Lauda.

prepoderence of the evidence- WTH? Based on some discussions its baseless to attack others. Dont know what fun you get from doing this and from harassing people or making up stories on imaginary friends - wait... isnt that pill addiction? 

Hereby proven QS is addicted to drugs.

[Lauda]

Well it is too bad that I am saying that I have a source that says you have a pill addiction. You are not disputing this claim, so it appears that based on the preponderance of the evidence presented, you have a pill addiction...

There is no evidence[1], which is why I'm insisting on seeing either chat logs or this *source*.

prepoderence of the evidence- WTH?

I legitimately facepalmed when I read that part.
[1] If the story about the various chat rooms were true, then there is undeniably at least *some* evidence. Given that it isn't, and there isn't, OP will not provide anything.

[ibminer]

I understand you have a "source" that you may trust but how do I know I should trust your source to believe the information you are providing?  It sounds like we are supposed to just accept your source without knowing anything about them or are supposed to just accept that Lauda is guilty with no proof or evidence except a lack of saying "I don't have a pill addiction"?  

If there is a glimmer of proof or evidence, I believe it would have been posted in the OP.
That is my claim, prove me wrong by PM'ing me your source & information.
If not, I'll update this post later with ">24 hours and still no source or information PMd by QS - must be fake"
(I probably won't actually update this post, just trying to make a point)

Seriously though, if you do actually PM me information and your claim holds water, I'll react honestly while protecting any "sources" who wish to remain unknown.

[Lauda]

oh man.. I remember hanging out the other night with Lauda and damn.. some fine catnip indeed!!
-snip-

You did not have to doxx me.

-snip-
If not, I'll update this post later with ">24 hours and still no source or information PMd by QS - must be fake"

And take no further action?

[marlboroza]

I read that as porn addiction, clicked the thread and was really disappointed.
I wonder how many members are actually addicted to porn, cocaine, weed or wanking? maybe we should ask your "source" QS. That would be about as relevant to anything as this thread

It is not fun at all to make fun of sex addicts. I am sex addict. My wife is "nymfo" and she is also sex addict. Not fun at all...Damn you TMAN, now you made me to have sex...again....for third time today...all I can think is sex sex sex...not fun at all to have so much sex...

~blah~

bla bla  

~blah?~

bla bla  

bla bla?

bla bla bla  

and an other strange thing are these lines (yes drugs again....)
________________________________________________________
do you guys think that your point is more interesting if you use lines in your posting.

Dude, we like LINES! 

[ibminer]

And take no further action?

I generally take action when I feel it is necessary. 

[nullius]

I am surprised that Vod is the only one who clearly called out the textbook smear tactic Quickseller here applies—and applies with hamhanded transparency, I might add.  I have highlighted three of Vod’s above posts with merit, because they stated exactly what I had in mind when I read OP—and they are the only answer Quickseller should receive as to his stated questions.

Observe:

Update: After >24 hours from when Lauda first responded to this thread, Lauda has yet to in any way deny, nor disputed he has an addiction to pills, nor has he denied that he abuses illegal drugs.

I am interested for Lauda to more specifically address this. Are you going to explicitly deny? Or is there truth to you having a drug addiction?

[...ad nauseam...]

It seems that Lauda is not interested in denying he is addicted to and/or abusing drugs. Very interesting indeed...

Placing somebody in a position to deny a scandalous accusation (from a mysterious “I was told by” source!) is one of the best-known cheap smear tactics from the Book of Cheap Smear Tactics.

(Next standard twist:  Classic “begging the question”.  “Lauda, when did you stop leaving negative trust tags while in drug-fuelled rages?”)

Get this:  I am also “not interested in denying” that I have a drug addiction, that I just raped and murdered someone, or that I’m a Bcasher, because the accusations are outrageous on their face and there is no evidence whatsoever for them.

Quickseller, give EVIDENCE.  PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

Lauda, in the absence of evidence, you are under no obligation whatsoever to deny, to explain why you won’t deny, or to do anything other than ridicule Quickseller as the obscene buffoon he is.

N.b. that early on here, I was so disgusted at one of this forum’s most odious trash threads that I made it excruciatingly clear how deeply I despise drug addicts (previously).  Even should Quickseller continue transparently applying textbook smear tactics (as I do expect) and direct them at me, I could not very well be accused of acting in sympathy to drug addiction.

Does being addicted to cats count as being an addict

Those evidentiary photographs posted upthread by minerjones don’t look so good, Lauda.  Do you deny doing lines of catnip with your kitties while sitting atop a huge pile of Bitcoins and laughing maniacally?  Do you deny it?  Very interesting, you don’t deny it...

[actmyname]

________________________________________________________

do you guys think that your point is more interesting if you use lines in your posting.

What cracks me up is that you actually went ahead and made a line with underscores.
Ilikehorizontalrules,okaybuddy?

[Vod]

LAUDA, I dreamed that you were the space alien creature that the Six Million Dollar Man fought back in 1977.



Since I have never seen you once deny this, I will assume Quickseller is the pedophile everyone talks about.

/LOGIC

(Please limit your merit to 10 per one of my posts - I don't want you to appear as my favorite.)

[Lauda]

And take no further action?

I generally take action when I feel it is necessary. 

Assuming the 24 hours have already passed, would you feel that action was necessary?

(Next standard twist:  Classic “begging the question”.  “Lauda, when did you stop leaving negative trust tags while in drug-fuelled rages?”)

Does waking up and being extremely grumpy because you haven't had coffee yet count? :thinking_face:

Lauda, in the absence of evidence, you are under no obligation whatsoever to deny, to explain why you won’t deny, or to do anything other than ridicule Quickseller as the obscene buffoon he is.

Thanks.

Those evidentiary photographs posted upthread by minerjones don’t look so good, Lauda.  Do you deny doing lines of catnip with your kitties while sitting atop a huge pile of Bitcoins and laughing maniacally?  Do you deny it?  Very interesting, you don’t deny it...

Guilty as charged. I just can't resist my nip. Purr..

LAUDA, I dreamed that you were the space alien creature that the Six Million Dollar Man fought back in 1977.
-snip-
Since I have never seen you once deny this, I will assume Quickseller is the pedophile everyone talks about.

I can neither confirm nor deny this accusation. I'm guessing that means that I am the creature

[ibminer]

And take no further action?

I generally take action when I feel it is necessary. 

Assuming the 24 hours have already passed, would you feel that action was necessary?

For what it's worth, with no response from QS, this is an entirely baseless accusation with not even an attempt to prove, which I do not agree with... not that my actions may matter that much in this situation.