Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2019, 02:03:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
  Print  
Author Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act  (Read 11544 times)
Lauda
GrumpyKitty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 2073


Modern Liberalism is a Mental Disorder


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 08:07:09 AM
 #461

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
1560780194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560780194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560780194
Reply with quote  #2

1560780194
Report to moderator

Mine RVN and with 0% mining fees and get paid in BTC, ETH, XMR or RVN.

www.cudominer.com Get Cudo Miner
Auto coin switching, third-party miners, overclocking and remote management (Win/Linux)
Run from a USB stick or install from an ISO image (Linux)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560780194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560780194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560780194
Reply with quote  #2

1560780194
Report to moderator
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1260


https://bit.ly/2FR9nyn - free python tutorials


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 12:06:35 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #462

blazed, hilariousandco, and now saltyspitton should still be removed from being "DT1" if they refuse to remove lauda from their trust lists...

Hilariousandco probably won't be removed from DT by theymos while he's a moderator on this forum (and he does a fairly good job). So you can pretty much forget about that one unless you were hoping that everyone else who put him on DT removed him?

minifrij
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1165


In Memory of Zepher


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2018, 12:29:07 PM
 #463

Hilariousandco probably won't be removed from DT by theymos while he's a moderator on this forum (and he does a fairly good job). So you can pretty much forget about that one unless you were hoping that everyone else who put him on DT removed him?
These people are on DT1, and so (to my knowledge) the only person that could remove them is theymos.
Luckily I very much doubt that will happen.
Lieldoryn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 272


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 01:09:35 PM
 #464

This is the right decision. I have nothing against laud. But I am sure that any member of the forum has no right to claim the right of a judge. I agree that all accounts listed in the list have signs of collusion. We have witnessed a coup attempt at the forum.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1679


Practice Captcha look at Avatar, slct Fire Hydrant


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2018, 01:25:51 PM
 #465

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.
Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

Hhampuz
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1625


In memory of Zepher.


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 01:29:24 PM
 #466

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.
Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

Nice trust!


.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
Gimpeline
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 505



View Profile
February 20, 2018, 01:44:23 PM
Merited by Lauda (2), The Pharmacist (1)
 #467

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.
Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

It's even more dishonest to make accusations without backing it up and then pretend that it is proven
It's even more dishonest to post with several accounts to make it look like more people agree with you.
There is no reason to deny things that is taken out of thin air
Lauda
GrumpyKitty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 2073


Modern Liberalism is a Mental Disorder


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 01:49:08 PM
 #468

It's even more dishonest to make accusations without backing it up and then pretend that it is proven
It's even more dishonest to post with several accounts to make it look like more people agree with you.
There is no reason to deny things that is taken out of thin air
Voila. There is no reason to count the users that I've tagged as valid exclusions, but here we are. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
killyou73
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 185


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 01:52:31 PM
Merited by nullius (1)
 #469

It's even more dishonest to make accusations without backing it up and then pretend that it is proven
It's even more dishonest to post with several accounts to make it look like more people agree with you.
There is no reason to deny things that is taken out of thin air
Voila. There is no reason to count the users that I've tagged as valid exclusions, but here we are. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

One might call that a witch hunt
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 3484


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 03:37:07 PM
 #470

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley

Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?

Get in line LOL

[...] I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
[...] Please share. I promise confidentiality.

I see QS has updated the title of the thread: "... 100 people excluded lauda", which brings all sorts of philosophical questions, e.g. are forum sockpuppets "people"?

jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1260


https://bit.ly/2FR9nyn - free python tutorials


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 03:50:46 PM
 #471

~
I see QS has updated the title of the thread: "... 100 people excluded lauda", which brings all sorts of philosophical questions, e.g. are forum sockpuppets "people"?

The majority of those are probably just random newbie scammers Lauda has marked and they have reciprocated for no other standpoint.
--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.
Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

Nice trust!



Mine says -241, not the -9999 (just saying)

Lauda
GrumpyKitty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 2073


Modern Liberalism is a Mental Disorder


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 03:55:05 PM
 #472

Mine says -241, not the -9999 (just saying)
Fix your trust list to one that isn't played due to greed and whatnot. Here you go:

Quote
~HostFat
gmaxwell
~OgNasty
qwk
Vod
~Tomatocage
DiamondCardz
KWH
ibminer
~defcon23
Mitchell
~cyclops
Blazed
hilariousandco
~shorena
~jonald_fyookball
~CryptoImperator
~chronicsky
~Quickseller
Zepher
actmyname
The Pharmacist
Lutpin
Gunthar
SaltySpitoon

I see QS has updated the title of the thread: "... 100 people excluded lauda", which brings all sorts of philosophical questions, e.g. are forum sockpuppets "people"?
Predicted answer (context wise) by the forum's Iago: If they exclude Lauda, yes. Otherwise, no.

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1260


https://bit.ly/2FR9nyn - free python tutorials


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 04:20:30 PM
 #473

Mine says -241, not the -9999 (just saying)
Fix your trust list to one that isn't played due to greed and whatnot. Here you go:

Quote
~HostFat
gmaxwell
~OgNasty
qwk
Vod
~Tomatocage
DiamondCardz
KWH
ibminer
~defcon23
Mitchell
~cyclops
Blazed
hilariousandco
~shorena
~jonald_fyookball
~CryptoImperator
~chronicsky
~Quickseller
Zepher
actmyname
The Pharmacist
Lutpin
Gunthar
SaltySpitoon

I see QS has updated the title of the thread: "... 100 people excluded lauda", which brings all sorts of philosophical questions, e.g. are forum sockpuppets "people"?
Predicted answer (context wise) by the forum's Iago: If they exclude Lauda, yes. Otherwise, no.

I don't go off overall ratings anyway if I do a trade I go through everyone's history. Technically I should remove everyone from my trust list (as DT1&2 are added by default) although sometimes it's a good interim warning.

What's the '~' for in that list? Trusted or untrusted? If so then what's up with jonald and shorena?

InvoKing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1064


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 04:29:41 PM
 #474

-snip-
What's the '~' for in that list? Trusted or untrusted? If so then what's up with jonald and shorena?

Code:
Prefix a user's name with a tilde (~) if you want to exclude them from your trust network.
Read Lauda or shorena/jonald trust comments and/or references for more details.
nullius
Copper Member
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 777


Help! I’ve got the Pleurodelinaemia! @nym.zone


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2018, 06:29:02 PM
Merited by The Pharmacist (1)
 #475

Fix your trust list to one that isn't played due to greed and whatnot. Here you go:

Quote
[long list]

My own trust list became much more reliable with just two simple entries:

Quote
gmaxwell
~OgNasty

Being new here, I’ve as yet had only limited time to evaluate whom I’d trust to the degree of bringing into my level 0.  I am ultra-conservative about trust, as a matter of principle; and level 0 requires not only great honesty, but also great wisdom.

gmaxwell is an obvious choice:  Besides being a well-known figure, he is up to his elbows daily in arcane, complex, mission-critical code which is the foundation for a currency worth hundreds of billions of dollars.  If you run a node—heck, if you use Bitcoin, then you already express great confidence in gmaxwell’s sound judgment as well as his basic integrity.

Over time, I’ll probably add most or all of your suggested additions.  I should definitely add more exclusions, right now.



I may later reply to some others.  Maybe.  Quickseller has here already achieved the objectives of destroying his own credibility for the ten thousandth time, making of himself a laughingstock, demonstrating behaviour which suggested a hot new meme, performing for me the liminal rite of making me stand accused by a lunatic that I must be Lauda in disguise, and helping the hungry by inducing them eat popcorn so they don’t die of starvation.  Anything more might be overkill; perhaps we should call /thread.

Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1679


Practice Captcha look at Avatar, slct Fire Hydrant


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2018, 07:35:41 PM
 #476

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.
Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

It's even more dishonest to make accusations without backing it up and then pretend that it is proven
It's even more dishonest to post with several accounts to make it look like more people agree with you.
Its too bad none of that is true.

Further there are very clearly others promoting their own interests, including one person entirely unrelated to the dispute that is the subject of this thread.
Quote
There is no reason to deny things that is taken out of thin air
When you respond to allegations with a request for proof, you give up your right to ignore the accusations.

nullius
Copper Member
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 777


Help! I’ve got the Pleurodelinaemia! @nym.zone


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2018, 08:00:55 PM
 #477

[gasp, choke, sputter]

It would be funny to watch him struggle to keep this going, if the joke hadn’t been old as of a few days ago.  It is still amusing to see this level of desperation from Quicksy.

There is no reason to deny things that is taken out of thin air
When you respond to allegations with a request for proof, you give up your right to ignore the accusations.

As Grand Poobah of your basement, you may find your peremptory edicts to hold some weight there.  Out here in the real world, actual evidence must be at hand before the subject of an accusation can be called to answer.  N.b., the word “actual” implies “neither dredged from the fantasies of fellow scammers who got red-handed, nor magicked out of thin air with a wave of your hands”.

* nullius yawns.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 3484


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
February 20, 2018, 10:59:11 PM
 #478

When you respond to allegations with a request for proof, you give up your right to ignore the accusations.

So let's see:

1) You post an allegation against someone, let's call her "Cat".
2) Cat requests proof.
3) You don't provide proof.
4) What exactly do you expect to happen here?

Stop digging your hole and show us some proof. Can't be that hard unless you don't have it.

Gimpeline
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 505



View Profile
February 21, 2018, 06:26:30 AM
 #479

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth. Smiley
Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?
Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.
Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

It's even more dishonest to make accusations without backing it up and then pretend that it is proven
It's even more dishonest to post with several accounts to make it look like more people agree with you.
Its too bad none of that is true.

Further there are very clearly others promoting their own interests, including one person entirely unrelated to the dispute that is the subject of this thread.
Quote
There is no reason to deny things that is taken out of thin air
When you respond to allegations with a request for proof, you give up your right to ignore the accusations.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2945878.msg30398505#msg30398505
I have posted with exactly two accounts in this thread, the other account was really just screwing around, and I don't think was backing my arguments.


Who is dishonest now  Roll Eyes
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 2253


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2018, 12:50:25 AM
 #480

I've been seriously thinking about reopening the idea of enforcing user-defined trust lists via suggestions, etc., deprecating DefaultTrust.

Any chance you could add a "Last Post" info on each profile?   Wink

I'm into creating universes, smiting people, writing holy books and listening to Prayer Messages (PMs).
BitcoinTalk Public Information Project (BPIP)  - BPIP Reports
"Masturbation makes you feel good but doesn't do anything for the person you're thinking of.  Just like prayer."
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!