MoviesChain by TVzavr Announcement - Decentralized Film Distribution Platform

[anibalin]

For me personally, the big problem is that I can no longer look at the same actors.

It feels like they're literally wandering from movie to movie.

It is often difficult to perceive an actor in a new role, when it is closely associated with the old one.

[1714791859]

1714791859

[1714791859]

1714791859

[Camer00nS0ccer]

For me personally, the big problem is that I can no longer look at the same actors.

It feels like they're literally wandering from movie to movie.

It is often difficult to perceive an actor in a new role, when it is closely associated with the old one.

Personally, this happens to me all the time.

[djpowers]

In my opinion, the most serious problem for cinema as for business is piracy and copyright infringement.

[djpowers]

In my opinion, the most serious problem for cinema as for business is piracy and copyright infringement.

Without a doubt, the ease with which films can be reproduced and distributed outside the licensing agreement makes piracy and copyright infringement a source of constant concern and expense.

[MarRu23]

We are so glad to announce the publication of the article in an authoritative weekly French film
magazine Le Film français (The French Film) where MoviesChain is described and evaluated by
the industry professionals. The whole article is devoted to the future of cinema and particularly
to the blockchain technology in film distribution. In this piece of writing, the authors not only to
their background knowledge but also to the thoughts of our financial advisor and cofounder of
MoviesChain Alexey Yeremenko. Those willing to find out more on the revolution in cinema
distribution which is due to come and spread throughout the whole globe are welcome:

http://www.lefilmfrancais.com/document/cannes2018/quotidien/FF9/index.html#p=6.

However, there’s one thing you should bear in mind: you need to know the French language in order to get
acquainted with the content of the article!

Problems in the modern film industry are huge enough, it's even pointless to deny.

[rulsbtc]

Personally, I don't like that the model of income distribution in the film industry is strongly biased towards intermediaries-distributors, not producers of independent films.

[mesk41ito_kk]

Personally, I don't like that the model of income distribution in the film industry is strongly biased towards intermediaries-distributors, not producers of independent films.

This is a problem of many fields of activity, not only the film industry. Where there are intermediaries, always the problems begin.

[counterelectro]

And to the producer of cinema as a result comes very little money.

[crypto_3agl3]

And to the producer of cinema as a result comes very little money.

Yes, you are right of course. Such a scheme greatly complicates the relationship between the producer of films and the end user, that is, the viewer.

[ArthurEntern]

And to the producer of cinema as a result comes very little money.

Yes, you are right of course. Such a scheme greatly complicates the relationship between the producer of films and the end user, that is, the viewer.

Of course, I would like to see the number of mediators reduced to a minimum.

[anibalin]

And to the producer of cinema as a result comes very little money.

Yes, you are right of course. Such a scheme greatly complicates the relationship between the producer of films and the end user, that is, the viewer.

Of course, I would like to see the number of mediators reduced to a minimum.

I think it will be almost impossible to implement.

[MarRu23]

And to the producer of cinema as a result comes very little money.

Yes, you are right of course. Such a scheme greatly complicates the relationship between the producer of films and the end user, that is, the viewer.

Of course, I would like to see the number of mediators reduced to a minimum.

I think it will be almost impossible to implement.

I consider that the scheme with a large number of intermediaries, of course, is expensive, but already well-established.

[CaliR45]

And to the producer of cinema as a result comes very little money.

Yes, you are right of course. Such a scheme greatly complicates the relationship between the producer of films and the end user, that is, the viewer.

Of course, I would like to see the number of mediators reduced to a minimum.

I think it will be almost impossible to implement.

I consider that the scheme with a large number of intermediaries, of course, is expensive, but already well-established.

In my opinion, it will be very difficult to break the established, stable ties.

[sheriffcliff]

This, of course, would be quite good for the industry.

[YaGuey]

This, of course, would be quite good for the industry.

Does anyone know how much money the middlemen end up with?

[buerttor]

This, of course, would be quite good for the industry.

Does anyone know how much money the middlemen end up with?

I think this is a very impressive figure.

[anibalin]

It seems to me that it is high time to challenge the monopoly of the largest studios and simplify the market entry for new players.

[counterelectro]

It seems to me that it is high time to challenge the monopoly of the largest studios and simplify the market entry for new players.

Yes, that would certainly be a new word in filmmaking.

[crypto_3agl3]

Recently I have a feeling that the production of films is no longer a profitable occupation.

[ArthurEntern]

Recently I have a feeling that the production of films is no longer a profitable occupation.

Personally, I have long had the same impression of this industry.