Daper
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2018, 02:45:57 AM |
|
That's because there's eyes popping 0% trading happening on Cryptopia, the only other exchange to list this dead shit.
|
|
|
|
|
thefix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2018, 04:52:54 PM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
|
|
|
|
shiki0 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 13, 2018, 02:23:53 PM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
CPU-only Yes memory bandwidth is usually the first bottleneck, secondary L3 cache size and finally - CPU frequency
|
|
|
|
thefix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 13, 2018, 09:22:39 PM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
CPU-only Yes memory bandwidth is usually the first bottleneck, secondary L3 cache size and finally - CPU frequency Here are some GPU benchmarks for anyone that is interested, I ran mine on linux with a power limit of 95 watts for a GTX 1070 so you can get more hash with full power. FYI GPU mining has been around for at least 6 months from my research. Benchmarks https://pool2mine.com/bench
|
|
|
|
shiki0 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 13, 2018, 10:15:08 PM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
CPU-only Yes memory bandwidth is usually the first bottleneck, secondary L3 cache size and finally - CPU frequency Here are some GPU benchmarks for anyone that is interested, I ran mine on linux with a power limit of 95 watts for a GTX 1070 so you can get more hash with full power. FYI GPU mining has been around for at least 6 months from my research. Benchmarks https://pool2mine.com/benchI'm running a few Xeons (E5 v4) 2.0-2.4kH/s per 110-150W (full system power consumption) also hacked a few low powered Intel (Core M) devices at 400-450H/s at 9W power consumption. Those numbers beat any GPU.I have also seen benchmarks on Intel gen 8. and AMD Ryzen/TR that can do even better than that. None the less RTX data is yet to come.
|
|
|
|
thefix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 13, 2018, 11:59:27 PM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
CPU-only Yes memory bandwidth is usually the first bottleneck, secondary L3 cache size and finally - CPU frequency Here are some GPU benchmarks for anyone that is interested, I ran mine on linux with a power limit of 95 watts for a GTX 1070 so you can get more hash with full power. FYI GPU mining has been around for at least 6 months from my research. Benchmarks https://pool2mine.com/benchI'm running a few Xeons (E5 v4) 2.0-2.4kH/s per 110-150W (full system power consumption) also hacked a few low powered Intel (Core M) devices at 400-450H/s at 9W power consumption. Those numbers beat any GPU.I have also seen benchmarks on Intel gen 8. and AMD Ryzen/TR that can do even better than that. None the less RTX data is yet to come. Those intel core M numbers are impressive, a single GTX 1070 in a system running an amd 200ge (35 watt TDP) with the card set to a power limit of 100 will do about 3.1kH/s with a power draw of 140 watts at the wall and you can get even more density and power efficiency with a 6 card rig. I have been able to get about 1.4kH/s on a ryzen 1500x and about the same speed on a threadripper 1950x which makes me think the threadripper needs 2 instances to run properly
|
|
|
|
shiki0 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 14, 2018, 12:20:43 AM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
CPU-only Yes memory bandwidth is usually the first bottleneck, secondary L3 cache size and finally - CPU frequency Here are some GPU benchmarks for anyone that is interested, I ran mine on linux with a power limit of 95 watts for a GTX 1070 so you can get more hash with full power. FYI GPU mining has been around for at least 6 months from my research. Benchmarks https://pool2mine.com/benchI'm running a few Xeons (E5 v4) 2.0-2.4kH/s per 110-150W (full system power consumption) also hacked a few low powered Intel (Core M) devices at 400-450H/s at 9W power consumption. Those numbers beat any GPU.I have also seen benchmarks on Intel gen 8. and AMD Ryzen/TR that can do even better than that. None the less RTX data is yet to come. Those intel core M numbers are impressive, a single GTX 1070 in a system running an amd 200ge (35 watt TDP) with the card set to a power limit of 100 will do about 3.1kH/s with a power draw of 140 watts at the wall and you can get even more density and power efficiency with a 6 card rig. I have been able to get about 1.4kH/s on a ryzen 1500x and about the same speed on a threadripper 1950x which makes me think the threadripper needs 2 instances to run properly New AMD's can do magic just need to assign the mining threads correctly since one thread cant access all of the L3 cache memory space as Intel CPUs. In cpuminer-opt play with -t and --cpu-affinity setting to get the best results.
|
|
|
|
thefix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 14, 2018, 10:40:19 PM |
|
Anyone else GPU mining this?
Also if you are using a cpu make sure you have dual channel memory for a big boost in hash rate. I have not tried it with a quad channel setup but I have a hunch you would see some performance boosts.
CPU-only Yes memory bandwidth is usually the first bottleneck, secondary L3 cache size and finally - CPU frequency Here are some GPU benchmarks for anyone that is interested, I ran mine on linux with a power limit of 95 watts for a GTX 1070 so you can get more hash with full power. FYI GPU mining has been around for at least 6 months from my research. Benchmarks https://pool2mine.com/benchI'm running a few Xeons (E5 v4) 2.0-2.4kH/s per 110-150W (full system power consumption) also hacked a few low powered Intel (Core M) devices at 400-450H/s at 9W power consumption. Those numbers beat any GPU.I have also seen benchmarks on Intel gen 8. and AMD Ryzen/TR that can do even better than that. None the less RTX data is yet to come. Those intel core M numbers are impressive, a single GTX 1070 in a system running an amd 200ge (35 watt TDP) with the card set to a power limit of 100 will do about 3.1kH/s with a power draw of 140 watts at the wall and you can get even more density and power efficiency with a 6 card rig. I have been able to get about 1.4kH/s on a ryzen 1500x and about the same speed on a threadripper 1950x which makes me think the threadripper needs 2 instances to run properly New AMD's can do magic just need to assign the mining threads correctly since one thread cant access all of the L3 cache memory space as Intel CPUs. In cpuminer-opt play with -t and --cpu-affinity setting to get the best results. That did the trick on the threadripper but its a power hungry beast so the Ryzen 1500x seems to be the best, thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
thefix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1049
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2018, 09:34:07 AM |
|
Rank Donor User Name KH/s GXX/Day BTC/Day 1 anonymous 1,106 581 0.0639 2 anonymous 632 332 0.0366 3 anonymous 458 240 0.0265 4 anonymous 363 190 0.0210
Those are some insane mining numbers, I wouldn't be surprised if someone was playing around with FPGA miners. CPU and GPU miners do not have a chance
|
|
|
|
shiki0 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 17, 2018, 02:03:51 PM |
|
Rank Donor User Name KH/s GXX/Day BTC/Day 1 anonymous 1,106 581 0.0639 2 anonymous 632 332 0.0366 3 anonymous 458 240 0.0265 4 anonymous 363 190 0.0210
Those are some insane mining numbers, I wouldn't be surprised if someone was playing around with FPGA miners. CPU and GPU miners do not have a chance
Even tho we are still one of the most profitable coins to CPU mine, I doubt our current algo is worth of spending time and effort of building FPGA miners - also cache memory is the most expencive part of CPU's. Lyra2z330 is currently used only on GXX and NOR: GXX has a daily miner inflation of around 400 GXX NOR has a daily miner inflation of around 2000 NOR If you check current coin prices and multiply it by that value...
|
|
|
|
hunterold
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 14, 2019, 05:43:09 PM |
|
Where to download Gxx wallet ?
|
|
|
|
cgt99
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 14, 2019, 09:12:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
truxton
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2019, 10:20:18 AM |
|
New #BlockDX Coin ANN - #GXX have now completed their rebrand. @GravityCoin_GXX is now ready for cross-blockchain #dApps with new #Blocknet integration Read more here: https://blocknet.co/gravitycoin/about/ + Trade $GXX on #BlockDX #DecentralizedExchange #dApp ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F69zCWKysvmbE0Q6ETD%2Fgiphy.gif&t=665&c=en-kqRqJXfdMRA)
|
|
|
|
|
cqqjmzzx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 08, 2019, 05:37:18 PM |
|
Where is GravityCoin's Windows wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
Cnfused
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 09, 2019, 01:16:21 AM |
|
HUGE NEWS from the Devs over on the GXX Discord, hop over there to check it out or otherwise getting ready for earth shattering announcements on here and Twitter too!!!
|
|
|
|
Cnfused
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2019, 02:42:08 PM |
|
https://twitter.com/HardforkedR/status/1121422567594545152"A significant indicator of a crypto's health is the community support. Masternodes are a key indicator of long term investment. GXX Xnodes have nearly doubled from 141 on 25/4/18 to 258 today." WOW, that's the power of the pull of GravityCoin!
|
|
|
|
|
|