Bitcoin Forum
September 21, 2019, 04:17:08 PM *
News: If you like a topic and you see an orange "bump" link, click it. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam!  (Read 6181 times)
Wendigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1031



View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:24:26 PM
 #421

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?
1569082628
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569082628

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569082628
Reply with quote  #2

1569082628
Report to moderator
1569082628
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569082628

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569082628
Reply with quote  #2

1569082628
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1569082628
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569082628

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569082628
Reply with quote  #2

1569082628
Report to moderator
1569082628
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569082628

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569082628
Reply with quote  #2

1569082628
Report to moderator
1569082628
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569082628

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569082628
Reply with quote  #2

1569082628
Report to moderator
alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:25:21 PM
 #422

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
Wendigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1031



View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:29:04 PM
 #423

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

And where is this money now?
alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:30:00 PM
 #424

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

And where is this money now?

In my possession, probably...? What is your point?

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
Wendigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1031



View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:31:56 PM
 #425

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

And where is this money now?

In my possession, probably...? What is your point?

That you are a fucking liar maybe?
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 3944


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:32:30 PM
Merited by marlboroza (1)
 #426

Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer.

Attempted scam is still a scam.

You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer.

It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.

What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.

alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:33:25 PM
 #427

Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer.

Attempted scam is still a scam.

You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer.

It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.

What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 3944


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:52:10 PM
 #428

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer.

Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors:

https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain



alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 03:53:27 PM
 #429

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer.

Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors:

https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain




Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 3944


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 04:03:57 PM
 #430

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

killyou73
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 185


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 04:30:59 PM
 #431

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Did anyone follow the blockchain to see where their initial investments went and then where their refund came from?

Anyone to think that a script for bustabit is fool proof is a fucking idiot
tmfp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1457


"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 05:07:09 PM
 #432

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Quote from: alia
Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%


Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

Quote from: alia
As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that
Quote
tweaking
made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.




Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
killyou73
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 185


View Profile
March 05, 2018, 08:04:18 PM
 #433

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Quote from: alia
Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%


Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

Quote from: alia
As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that
Quote
tweaking
made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.





If you look at the bets, it looks like the profit is 0.01ish no matter how much they start with
alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 06, 2018, 12:03:26 AM
 #434

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Quote from: alia
Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%


Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

Quote from: alia
As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that
Quote
tweaking
made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.





I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
tmfp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1457


"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."


View Profile
March 06, 2018, 12:16:11 AM
 #435

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 06, 2018, 01:02:36 AM
 #436

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

No, that's the thing. The only thing that was "proven" was that no script can be profitable in the long run. For me, the script works. Maybe I was just lucky. I even gave aTriz the script, he saw it was real, he run it himself, and it worked.

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1745



View Profile WWW
March 06, 2018, 01:03:18 AM
 #437

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...

Find the fire hydrant in my Avatar for a prize.
alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 06, 2018, 01:05:32 AM
 #438

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...

How is that at all relevent? Ad hominems get us nowheere

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
nullius
Copper Member
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 781


Help! I’ve got the Pleurodelinaemia! @nym.zone


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2018, 01:13:15 AM
 #439

Notable on the record:  Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

alia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 113

Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)


View Profile
March 06, 2018, 01:14:11 AM
 #440

Notable on the record:  Alia locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

cough

Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!