Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam!

[Wendigo]

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

[1715168727]

1715168727

[1715168727]

1715168727

[1715168727]

1715168727

[1715168727]

1715168727

[1715168727]

1715168727

[alia]

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

[Wendigo]

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

And where is this money now?

[alia]

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

And where is this money now?

In my possession, probably...? What is your point?

[Wendigo]

Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam

Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass.

What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?

Signed address had about 2k.

And where is this money now?

In my possession, probably...? What is your point?

That you are a fucking liar maybe?

[suchmoon]

Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer.

Attempted scam is still a scam.

You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer.

It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.

What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.

[alia]

Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer.

Attempted scam is still a scam.

You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer.

It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.

What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

[suchmoon]

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer.

Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors:

https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

[alia]

I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.

You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer.

Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors:

https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

[suchmoon]

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

[killyou73]

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Did anyone follow the blockchain to see where their initial investments went and then where their refund came from?

Anyone to think that a script for bustabit is fool proof is a fucking idiot

[tmfp]

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%

Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that

tweaking

made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.

[killyou73]

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%

Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that

tweaking

made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.

If you look at the bets, it looks like the profit is 0.01ish no matter how much they start with

[alia]

Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD

And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.

What you're telling is mostly lies.

nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script.

I'll go with Mr. Occam here.

Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script.
If that is the case, it begs the questions:

1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for?
2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it?

Name      Amount    Return Amount    ROI

 slaman29    0.005           0.007              140%   
    nullius         0.01            0.02              200%
 slaman29     0.1              0.11               110%
 slaman29     0.1              0.107             107%
  v4d1mm    0.005           0.0058           116%
  v4d1mm    0.0475           0.052           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.014           140%
TelevisionLover  0.01            0.013           130%
TelevisionLover  0.05            0.055           110%
TelevisionLover  0.1            0.109           109%
SyGambler    0.01            0.012           120%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.21             105%
TelevisionLover  0.2            0.22             110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
TelevisionLover  0.25            0.275           110%
live:tonyl6         2.5              2.8           112%
favours         0.8              0.88           110%

Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%.

As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.

I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out.

Although his/her/etc. later claims that

tweaking

made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

[tmfp]

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

[alia]

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

No, that's the thing. The only thing that was "proven" was that no script can be profitable in the long run. For me, the script works. Maybe I was just lucky. I even gave aTriz the script, he saw it was real, he run it himself, and it worked.

[Quickseller]

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...

[alia]

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...

How is that at all relevent? Ad hominems get us nowheere

[nullius]

Notable on the record:  Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

[alia]

Notable on the record:  Alia locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

cough