Wendigo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:24:26 PM |
|
Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam
Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass. What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:25:21 PM |
|
Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam
Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass. What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it? Signed address had about 2k.
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
Wendigo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:29:04 PM |
|
Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam
Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass. What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it? Signed address had about 2k. And where is this money now?
|
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:30:00 PM |
|
Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam
Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass. What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it? Signed address had about 2k. And where is this money now? In my possession, probably...? What is your point?
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
Wendigo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:31:56 PM |
|
Cause you are trying to pull a master p level type of scam
Ah, yes. An account with -1000 neg trust can refund $2k and people will totally trust it with $100,000. You fucking dumbass. I expect not a single cent from anyone on here, that much is evident. I may be poor but one thing I have (unlike aTriz) is a strong moral compass. What happened to that signed address of yours with a lot of Bitcoins on it? Do you own it? Signed address had about 2k. And where is this money now? In my possession, probably...? What is your point? That you are a fucking liar maybe?
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:32:30 PM Merited by marlboroza (1) |
|
Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?
This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer. Attempted scam is still a scam. You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer. It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.
What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same.
|
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:33:25 PM |
|
Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?
This question has been answered numerous times, you just don't like the answer. Attempted scam is still a scam. You're still insisting that a magic winning script exists. Filthy scammer. It's been a policy from the very beginning for me to never show my face, so obviously not. You're welcome to skype and interview us both together (bodies only, that is) and ask us anything you like.
What's the point then? We can ask anything we like here, and you're lying just the same. I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:52:10 PM Last edit: November 29, 2020, 02:59:00 PM by suchmoon |
|
I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.
You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer. Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagainEdited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image
|
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:53:27 PM |
|
I didn't attempt a scam, dumbfuck. I genuinely believe my script works (as it has been doing for EVERY investor thus far) and I sold it whilst believing that.
You've been told numerous times that it can't work. You can't use the naïveté defense. Well, you can and you do, it just makes you look even more of a liar and a scammer. Here is how well it works for you and your imaginary investors: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagainOh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
March 05, 2018, 04:03:57 PM |
|
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD
And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
What you're telling is mostly lies. nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script. I'll go with Mr. Occam here.
|
|
|
|
killyou73
|
|
March 05, 2018, 04:30:59 PM |
|
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD
And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
What you're telling is mostly lies. nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script. I'll go with Mr. Occam here. Did anyone follow the blockchain to see where their initial investments went and then where their refund came from? Anyone to think that a script for bustabit is fool proof is a fucking idiot
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
|
March 05, 2018, 05:07:09 PM |
|
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD
And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
What you're telling is mostly lies. nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script. I'll go with Mr. Occam here. Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script. If that is the case, it begs the questions: 1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for? 2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it? Name Amount Return Amount ROI
slaman29 0.005 0.007 140% nullius 0.01 0.02 200% slaman29 0.1 0.11 110% slaman29 0.1 0.107 107% v4d1mm 0.005 0.0058 116% v4d1mm 0.0475 0.052 109% SyGambler 0.01 0.014 140% TelevisionLover 0.01 0.013 130% TelevisionLover 0.05 0.055 110% TelevisionLover 0.1 0.109 109% SyGambler 0.01 0.012 120% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.21 105% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110% TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110% TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110% live:tonyl6 2.5 2.8 112%
favours 0.8 0.88 110%
Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%. As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.
I'll elaborate further: The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out. Although his/her/etc. later claims that tweaking made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency.
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
killyou73
|
|
March 05, 2018, 08:04:18 PM |
|
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD
And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
What you're telling is mostly lies. nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script. I'll go with Mr. Occam here. Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script. If that is the case, it begs the questions: 1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for? 2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it? Name Amount Return Amount ROI
slaman29 0.005 0.007 140% nullius 0.01 0.02 200% slaman29 0.1 0.11 110% slaman29 0.1 0.107 107% v4d1mm 0.005 0.0058 116% v4d1mm 0.0475 0.052 109% SyGambler 0.01 0.014 140% TelevisionLover 0.01 0.013 130% TelevisionLover 0.05 0.055 110% TelevisionLover 0.1 0.109 109% SyGambler 0.01 0.012 120% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.21 105% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110% TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110% TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110% live:tonyl6 2.5 2.8 112%
favours 0.8 0.88 110%
Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%. As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.
I'll elaborate further: The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out. Although his/her/etc. later claims that tweaking made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency. If you look at the bets, it looks like the profit is 0.01ish no matter how much they start with
|
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 06, 2018, 12:03:26 AM |
|
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD
And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
What you're telling is mostly lies. nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script. I'll go with Mr. Occam here. Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script. If that is the case, it begs the questions: 1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for? 2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it? Name Amount Return Amount ROI
slaman29 0.005 0.007 140% nullius 0.01 0.02 200% slaman29 0.1 0.11 110% slaman29 0.1 0.107 107% v4d1mm 0.005 0.0058 116% v4d1mm 0.0475 0.052 109% SyGambler 0.01 0.014 140% TelevisionLover 0.01 0.013 130% TelevisionLover 0.05 0.055 110% TelevisionLover 0.1 0.109 109% SyGambler 0.01 0.012 120% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.21 105% TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110% TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110% TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110% live:tonyl6 2.5 2.8 112%
favours 0.8 0.88 110%
Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%. As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.
I'll elaborate further: The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out. Although his/her/etc. later claims that tweaking made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency. I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
|
March 06, 2018, 12:16:11 AM |
|
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out. Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?' Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 06, 2018, 01:02:36 AM |
|
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out. Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?' Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that. No, that's the thing. The only thing that was "proven" was that no script can be profitable in the long run. For me, the script works. Maybe I was just lucky. I even gave aTriz the script, he saw it was real, he run it himself, and it worked.
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2300
|
|
March 06, 2018, 01:03:18 AM |
|
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings...
|
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 06, 2018, 01:05:32 AM |
|
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Most of what you "paid out" was to a newbie with very shady dealings... How is that at all relevent? Ad hominems get us nowheere
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
nullius
|
|
March 06, 2018, 01:13:15 AM |
|
Notable on the record: Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it. I suppose not.
|
|
|
|
alia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
|
|
March 06, 2018, 01:14:11 AM |
|
Notable on the record: Alia locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it. I suppose not. cough
|
Lowest interest lending in bitcointalk history. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846750.0
|
|
|
|