ig0tik3d
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
 |
October 10, 2013, 06:26:17 PM |
|
something wrong with source... not all files was uploaded on githab.com which file is not uploaded to github?  |
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
October 10, 2013, 07:04:10 PM |
|
something wrong with source... not all files was uploaded on githab.com which file is not uploaded to github? ok try now I manually added them  |
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
110110101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 10, 2013, 09:05:15 PM |
|
......
one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)
That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores? Impressive setup either way! |
|
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
October 10, 2013, 09:12:41 PM |
|
......
one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)
That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores? Impressive setup either way! 5 boxes (24 = 2 CPUs with 12 cores each) some time ago I had total 198 cores, but now only that 88 left  |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
October 10, 2013, 09:19:57 PM |
|
......
one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)
That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores? Impressive setup either way! 5 boxes (24 = 2 CPUs with 12 cores each) some time ago I had total 198 cores, but now only that 88 left Are you renting those, or are they part of some unused infrastructure you have access to? |
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
October 10, 2013, 09:34:08 PM
Last edit: October 10, 2013, 10:06:13 PM by maxsolnc |
|
......
one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)
That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores? Impressive setup either way! 5 boxes (24 = 2 CPUs with 12 cores each) some time ago I had total 198 cores, but now only that 88 left Are you renting those, or are they part of some unused infrastructure you have access to? Unused infrastructure. Sometimes some machines become 'used' and I lose some of hashpower, but it is still rather good for CPU coins. edited: difficulty 65K  |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:41:13 PM |
|
......
one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)
That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores? Impressive setup either way! 5 boxes (24 = 2 CPUs with 12 cores each) some time ago I had total 198 cores, but now only that 88 left Are you renting those, or are they part of some unused infrastructure you have access to? Unused infrastructure. Sometimes some machines become 'used' and I lose some of hashpower, but it is still rather good for CPU coins. edited: difficulty 65K How many blocks are you getting with the new difficulty? Oh, and to OP: tried on i5-2500k (no OC) and got around 8300-8700 kH/s  |
|
|
|
|
Aalesund
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:44:53 PM |
|
difficulty 65K If difficulty is rising so fast maybe after a year difficulty of BLC will be greater than that difficulty of Bitcoin, hehehehehe. And maybe 1 BLC = 2 BTC hehehehe Just a joke, of course May I ask, when we will have a working BLC p2pool? I don't mine BLC because now is very hard for solo mining, I'm waiting a pool. |
Let's color the MOON: YN4VBGgcmm7nAGqhc2zeUN7eJXCxfWyWGa
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:57:14 PM |
|
difficulty 65K If difficulty is rising so fast maybe after a year difficulty of BLC will be greater than that difficulty of Bitcoin, hehehehehe. And maybe 1 BLC = 2 BTC hehehehe Just a joke, of course May I ask, when we will have a working BLC p2pool? I don't mine BLC because now is very hard for solo mining, I'm waiting a pool. working on p2pool currently and hope to get something ready soon |
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
|
bronan
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:12:49 AM |
|
Something is wrong the program closed by itself for no reason
I restarted the program and again poof closed
No messages or errors given just instant gone
|
|
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:31:04 AM
Last edit: October 11, 2013, 01:30:30 AM by BlueDragon747 |
|
Something is wrong the program closed by itself for no reason
I restarted the program and again poof closed
No messages or errors given just instant gone
have you updated? Remember to update your wallets before block 3500 as I have fixed some bugs added more checkpoints and tweaked the up step to reduce large jumps upwards  also you can find the debug.log in same directory as Blakecoin.conf scroll to end and it often gives the errors edit: block 3500 and new rule in effect waiting for retargets over next few hours |
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
October 11, 2013, 02:05:54 AM |
|
Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256....  |
|
|
|
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
|
|
October 11, 2013, 02:37:26 AM |
|
Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256.... that's just the c code for blake-512 the stuff that runs on the GPU is the .cl files, not had time to work on the GPU miner but I do have blake-256 in opencl soon as I get p2pool working and take a look at the pool code for a few operators I will be working on the GPU miner |
Info: Github - Blakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
|
|
|
|
maxsolnc
|
|
October 11, 2013, 06:18:17 AM |
|
......
one thread per core. 3*24-core machines, 2*8-core machines (all - Xeon servers)
That's some pretty serious hardware you have got there sir. Is that a box with 3xcpus each with 24 cores or are you running 5 boxes with a total of 88 cores? Impressive setup either way! 5 boxes (24 = 2 CPUs with 12 cores each) some time ago I had total 198 cores, but now only that 88 left Are you renting those, or are they part of some unused infrastructure you have access to? Unused infrastructure. Sometimes some machines become 'used' and I lose some of hashpower, but it is still rather good for CPU coins. edited: difficulty 65K How many blocks are you getting with the new difficulty? Oh, and to OP: tried on i5-2500k (no OC) and got around 8300-8700 kH/s Nothing during last 8h. So you understand: 70 MH, no blocks. Either there are huge EC2 instances, or gpu\fpga miner. |
DTC: DMcKNp47fNtgM7sritK9GfJEQ1DzME5nwk
BTC: 1FgUGra685ZwkrX5VnRvfaYp4bHJhC7x4H
|
|
|
|
kramble
|
|
October 11, 2013, 08:38:55 AM |
|
Nothing during last 8h. So you understand: 70 MH, no blocks. Either there are huge EC2 instances, or gpu\fpga miner.
Not fpga, unless somebody else is working on it. I've only got a single lancelot at 25MH/s (early days yet, will do better) which has mined 3 blocks so far, and nothing overnight (140 diff=256 hashes in 8 hours, but none accepted). The blake algorithm is not overly complicated though, so its quite possible somebody's got a GPU port up and running by now. |
|
|
|
Carabudala
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2013, 09:57:44 AM |
|
wich miner you use with FPGA/BE?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kramble
|
|
October 11, 2013, 10:15:42 AM |
|
wich miner you use with FPGA/BE?
Writing my own. Still early days development-wise. It will go up on github as open-source once I get it into a presentable state (its a right dog's breakfast of a hack at the moment). It will just be for lancelot/icarus boards initially as ztex are more difficult to interface to. Won't work on BlockEruptor (it that's what you mean be BE), that's a sha256d asic, completely incapable of blake. |
|
|
|
|
meta.p02
|
|
October 11, 2013, 10:28:27 AM |
|
Tested on i5-3337U: ~5.1 MH/s. with 8 threads. @kramble: Hm. Gotta buy an FPGA, then.  |
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
October 11, 2013, 10:52:16 AM |
|
Wow, difficulty is approaching 90,000 :O How hard do you guys think it would be to make reaper do blake? Interestingly enough, the reaper source code has a file for blake-512, but we need 256.... that's just the c code for blake-512 the stuff that runs on the GPU is the .cl files, not had time to work on the GPU miner but I do have blake-256 in opencl soon as I get p2pool working and take a look at the pool code for a few operators I will be working on the GPU miner Ahh, right, silly me. Can't believe I forgot to look at instructions  Have you seen https://github.com/wfr/clblake/tree/master/src? |
|
|
|
spark_li
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
Nothing
|
|
October 11, 2013, 11:13:43 AM |
|
shit,
BLC has two block chain ?
current can't sync
in debug.log file show
trying connection 23.20.60.243:8773 lastseen=19.6hrs
RandAddSeed() 200700 bytes
received block 00000000007592e2973b7d2f526265c701881fea41b347ccee88930364e28529
nActualTimespan = 2009 before bounds
GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 3600 nActualTimespan = 3130
Before: 1c0217a6 000000000217a600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After: 1c01d1b7 0000000001d1b7705b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b05b0
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
when sync with network,it stop in block of 3559
|
L.
|
|
|
|
