smolen (OP)
|
|
April 16, 2015, 12:02:57 PM |
|
Why is the CPU load to 100%? Can be corrected in newer versions GPU miner?
1) Because of some bug, may be on Smelter side, may be in AMD driver 2) Probably Try to add this in cmd file as the first line setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
April 16, 2015, 02:31:20 PM |
|
Is there a bug on 15.3 driver?(280x+7950) İ cannot reduce my mem clock ++ and cannot change coreclock of 7950 's . Thst's couse of smelter or driver ?
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 16, 2015, 05:50:50 PM |
|
smolen will there be versions for other algos too or you'll stick just with whirlpoolx?
|
|
|
|
mik_druid
|
|
April 16, 2015, 07:23:44 PM |
|
Any configs for r 290? What speed do you have while mining vanilla?
|
|
|
|
smolen (OP)
|
|
April 17, 2015, 12:13:31 AM |
|
Don't worry, I do read all the feedback. Right now priorities are: - Better logging, so user could just send log file to me, without typing all needed details (OS, driver version, GPU model, pool, etc). Unless done, bugs and I have some disagreements about the idea of bughunting - Pool monitoring, balancing and failover. Must have. - Better printed statistics, now it's not always clear what Smelter is busy with smolen will there be versions for other algos too or you'll stick just with whirlpoolx?
I'm stuck not with kernel, but with miner itself. Yes, expect new kernels later, but some will be paid ones, most probably with profit splitting. Is there a bug on 15.3 driver?(280x+7950) İ cannot reduce my mem clock ++ and cannot change coreclock of 7950 's . Thst's couse of smelter or driver ?
Right now I can only guess. Wait for the next version, then I'll be able to get to it. Any configs for r 290? What speed do you have while mining vanilla?
I have only one 280x, the best settings for other cards may differ. Right now speed is 542MH/s with 280x, 4 threads, worksize 64, core 1150, mem 500 on Linux. (Linux build will be released when I figure out how to do license-safe static build)
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
April 17, 2015, 08:32:16 AM |
|
Don't forget an API so external tools can play with it too (While you're busy doing logging, failover, etc...)
|
|
|
|
uplodex
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 13
|
|
April 17, 2015, 11:56:06 AM |
|
I intend to buy a AMD Radeon r9 280x for mining vanilla coin. I look for a tutorial that explains how to mining vanilla and how optimized the AMD Radeon r9 280x for 400 Mh / s
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
April 17, 2015, 04:12:32 PM |
|
Don't worry, I do read all the feedback. Right now priorities are: - Better logging, so user could just send log file to me, without typing all needed details (OS, driver version, GPU model, pool, etc). Unless done, bugs and I have some disagreements about the idea of bughunting - Pool monitoring, balancing and failover. Must have. - Better printed statistics, now it's not always clear what Smelter is busy with smolen will there be versions for other algos too or you'll stick just with whirlpoolx?
I'm stuck not with kernel, but with miner itself. Yes, expect new kernels later, but some will be paid ones, most probably with profit splitting. Is there a bug on 15.3 driver?(280x+7950) İ cannot reduce my mem clock ++ and cannot change coreclock of 7950 's . Thst's couse of smelter or driver ?
Right now I can only guess. Wait for the next version, then I'll be able to get to it. Any configs for r 290? What speed do you have while mining vanilla?
I have only one 280x, the best settings for other cards may differ. Right now speed is 542MH/s with 280x, 4 threads, worksize 64, core 1150, mem 500 on Linux. (Linux build will be released when I figure out how to do license-safe static build) Tried different drivers, nothing changed. i guess it's cus of smelter ))) .will wait your updates, ))
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
M1ST3R
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
|
April 17, 2015, 08:14:59 PM |
|
Smolen, thanks for sharing but I cannot get both version .6 and .7 to work on 4 GPUs (2 r9 290 + 2 r9 290x) rig. Doesn't matter what setting was used - max hashrate was 5+MHS for the rig. BTW, this is on Windows 8.1 pro x64 with CAT 14.6 RC3
|
|
|
|
groggin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 17, 2015, 09:01:38 PM |
|
yes! thank you for sharing
|
|
|
|
Vampire_sumy
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2015, 10:41:18 PM |
|
Smolen, thanks for sharing but I cannot get both version .6 and .7 to work on 4 GPUs (2 r9 290 + 2 r9 290x) rig. Doesn't matter what setting was used - max hashrate was 5+MHS for the rig. BTW, this is on Windows 8.1 pro x64 with CAT 14.6 RC3
You must place amd_opencl64.dll , amd_opencl32.dll , amdocl64.dll and amdocl.dll files into smelter miners folder. (This files you can find in amd drivers)
|
|
|
|
cinnamon_carter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
|
|
April 28, 2015, 06:01:30 AM |
|
Smolen do you have a github with source for anything you 'released' open , maybe others could contribute things and also end up solving other issues you may be running into.... if not , i understand , this is your 'business' and choice to release or not relase the source..... to anyone who complains be glad someone is working on a gpu miner for your algo.... gpu with fee is better than cpu without one.... mining like that is like having a ruber band slingshot while other miners have ak's lol
|
Check out my coin Photon Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power https://www.blakecoin.org/The obvious choice is not always the best choice. LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC
|
|
|
smolen (OP)
|
|
April 29, 2015, 06:34:44 PM |
|
Don't forget an API so external tools can play with it too (While you're busy doing logging, failover, etc...) I'm probably aiming too high here - good algo/pool switching code must be able to catch and exploit short spikes in prices and difficulties. For example, when current Vanillacoin block has low difficulty, miner should be able to temporarily switch to solo and then back to the pool. My code is not ready for it yet, not sure about standalone mining managers. I intend to buy a AMD Radeon r9 280x for mining vanilla coin. I look for a tutorial that explains how to mining vanilla and how optimized the AMD Radeon r9 280x for 400 Mh / s
Oh, no, you'd better to try water with more mature software like sgminer. yes! thank you for sharing My profit here is user feedback - never know what way to break the software will find in the wild
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
smolen (OP)
|
|
April 29, 2015, 07:35:17 PM |
|
Smolen do you have a github with source for anything you 'released' open , maybe others could contribute things and also end up solving other issues you may be running into.... if not , i understand , this is your 'business' and choice to release or not relase the source..... to anyone who complains be glad someone is working on a gpu miner for your algo.... gpu with fee is better than cpu without one.... mining like that is like having a ruber band slingshot while other miners have ak's lol
Actually my second post on this forum was about releasing Copperlark miner - with sources on github. I've sent almost all OpenCL sources (except Groestl) to someone who just asked via PM. Then all the OpenCL code from Quark kernel was published right here, in this thread - and Skein implementation found new home in sp_'s Ccminer. All but one nuances about WhirlpoolX kernel were talked about openly, everybody is welcome to use this tricks. You see, I'm reasonably open about ideas, share old code, but greedy with hot new toys I'm working on my own closed GPU miner that I plan to release, as well - from his standpoint, I don't see why he would. Should be far more flexible than the current miners and have a sane structure, as well; currently mines successfully at pools! :3
Good miner under BSD/X11 license will raise the share of all mining kernel developers. But working miner for PoS coins would be even better
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
BogdanEraser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2015, 02:48:57 PM Last edit: May 05, 2015, 06:45:14 AM by BogdanEraser |
|
With worksize 256 and 4 threads R9 270x on 1100/1400 gives 267Mh/s. Many thanx. Waiting for clocks and temp control within Smelter.
|
|
|
|
malickie
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
May 07, 2015, 08:13:57 PM Last edit: May 07, 2015, 08:40:29 PM by malickie |
|
So, not sure why people are getting low rates but my R9 290x is sitting comfortably at 600+ MH/s. I did notice trying to use anything other than the most up to date driver for AMD does seem to drop the Hash rate down dramatically. Also this is on Windows 8.1 at Stock speeds, no OC. OC seems to heat the Card up way too much for my tastes. This is a HIS R9 290x base speed is 1040/1350 for this card 87c is what the temp is at and the voltage draw looks to max out at 1080ish according to MSI Afterburner.
Edit: Forgot to add, this is my settings in the .cmd file, smelter -o stratum+tcp://stratum.westhash.com:3343 -u user.name -p password -g 4 -W 64 Going up in Worksize seems to bring the hash rate down just an FYI
This software does desperately need control over Fan Speed. Auto-Fan, Gpu Over Heat/Target Temp/Temp Cutoff.
I have an old 6850 that I would like to get to work with this software. Any possibilities of seeing that card added?
|
|
|
|
|
smolen (OP)
|
|
May 08, 2015, 12:57:14 AM |
|
Heads up to any miners who may be watching this thread but not the official vanilla coin thread, PoW mining is going to be paused for 20,000 blocks starting at block 117,833
Thank you for warning. Not sure I will release new version before this pause Waiting for clocks and temp control within Smelter.
Yes, it's in work. This software does desperately need control over Fan Speed. Auto-Fan, Gpu Over Heat/Target Temp/Temp Cutoff.
Oops, sorry, not going to be implemented in the nearest releases. I cannot just copy control algorithm from cgminer and friends, getting it done from scratch will take time. I have an old 6850 that I would like to get to work with this software. Any possibilities of seeing that card added?
Yes, still possible while my code is OpenCL.
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
malickie
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
May 08, 2015, 08:56:44 PM Last edit: May 08, 2015, 11:22:28 PM by malickie |
|
Why not release new Versions, you can still use it to mine say WestHash/NiceHash Pools and whatever other pools offer WhirlPoolx Algo.
Edit: Found a trick with Smelter at least on my R9 290x. IT by default does GPU Clock Dynamic so it doesn't fully utilize the Overclock there. What I did was open Sgminer so it would pin GPU Clock to max and instead of using q to quit just click x on the window so your GPU Clock stays locked into whatever OC it is. Than open Smelter. Mining at 700.59 MH/s. Granted at this speed and OC 1100/1500 My card is pretty darn toasty so I wouldn't recommend it unless you have Liquid or really good Fans and Airflow for the GPU 90c with fans at 100% and 67f with fan blowing into PC.
Edit: I also just noticed that it seems the speed has way more to do with GPU Clock than Mem Clock. Sweetspot on my GPU Clock seems to be 1125, 1150 gave artifacting, so it would be 1125/1350, speed seems to be around 715 MH/s I think, although it is still climbing slowly. Still runs very toasty though at 90c.
|
|
|
|
bitspill
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
|
|
May 09, 2015, 03:50:40 AM |
|
Why not release new Versions, you can still use it to mine say WestHash/NiceHash Pools and whatever other pools offer WhirlPoolx Algo. Pointing your miner at a pool won't do anything if the coins network won't accept the blocks.
|
|
|
|
|