Bounty and too many participants

[baghdatis1990]

Make a regulation by which to choose the best, I do not think it is possible. I do not see how you can check the potential of the enrolled. In my opinion it is impossible. If you mean that only those with a large number of followers / friends should remain in the Twitter and facebook campaigns, it would seem like a radical, unjust decision.

[1714976139]

1714976139

[1714976139]

1714976139

[1714976139]

1714976139

[1714976139]

1714976139

[1714976139]

1714976139

[usamamalik555]

I don't think there are too many participants.in General, if a lot of participants so the project is really cool and should definitely participate in it

[f4t4l]

I believe that the bounty which a lot of participants it's a good quality to bounty so be happy that you got such projects

[mylyn2327]

Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.

Absolutely, investors know what is the best thing to do with their investment, if the project is good probably they will invest no matter what. And also what we do in Bounty campaigns is a good tool to promote the project so many investors will be encourage to invest and to support a certain bounty. Some bounty do have limit with their participants so no need to think about it.

[Mr.Spreadthehamster]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I do not think that it is a big problem.
As people joining mostly Twitter and Facebook compaigns, and some f people are coming there and see, that there is not possible to earn big money and go away.
As for investors, I cannot agree with you, because ICOs mostly get money from big investors rather those people who take part in bounty compaigns.

[sham100899]

yeah we need to put some rules and regulations regarding the participants limits.

[NikitaGo]

There are projects with very promising ideas and already go to the ICO with the alpha version, such a project will attract more investors and bounty participants, but the conditions are often dictated by the manager, and where there are restrictions on the participants, it is likely that you can earn more.

[Willfirst]

It's true, if you look at spreadsheet from bounty manager "Needmoney" there always in 4-5k in Social Media bounty. For signature still can have good profit.. but a lot of newbies come and come here.

[cschy01]

Well said sir.Day by day participant going increasing in bounty program.And for this reason bounty reward become weak.If this happen going on few days then many participant lost enchantment for take a part in bounty program.So if the Honorable bitcointalk community firm theirs rules for joining bounty program then i personally think this problem can be solve.

[rasp]

Recently, in the most popular bounty campaigns, each participant receives quite a few! Therefore, you should carefully choose where to participate, sometimes even the most unkind at first glance the project can bring a big income!

[Masik2018]

I've noticed that some of bounties going to limit participants or budget on bounty, then it doesn't have any bad effect on that.

[azianphoenix]

That's why I'm not looking for bounty on rating sites, too much demand. Look for projects by yourself, among the offered by the market. Look closer to the promising Vreo.io  .They haven't gained popularity yet, but their idea and team are very impressive

[PetrovichCoinMaster]

There really is such a problem. And you will not surprise anybody with companies on social networks with 1500+ participants. I think that we need to move to less popular areas, such as media and video. And there is an influx of people.

[greg0rioo]

Bounty campaign is popular in this crytocurrency because i think it is the best way to earn with no capital. but right now it is hard to. join bounty campaign first because of the ranking system, then some of the campaign are picking the best participant to their campaign.

[Bismillas]

A lot of people are participating in bounty campaigns to get some free money, of course it's not good, the more participants in a bounty campaign, the lesser the reward each participant will earn, but everyone wants to earn their money, this cannot be denied

[mattmct]

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are not yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties. We don't even have much persons yet in the crypto space,  by 2020 we are going to see alot of adoption even much more bounties participants.

[HPQ.IO]

Where do you see too many participants, guys?

It's just the beginning...

[Elcapsono]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Bounty is a way to make some money with little or no effort. Now, too, everything depends on the rank of the participant, if he is higher then the reward for participation will also be higher. But each bounty has its own limited budget and the more participants the less, although it is not correct.

[alttravel]

Now there are a lot of participants in the social network programs, the payments are very small. I prefer the company's bounty, but there are always a lot of questions related to counting awards, problems with payments.

[Kilomans]

 I think this rise of many participants is a good thing and is a healthy competition. Those who are afraid or annoyed with the increase of participants are either worried about somebody taking their jobs. Even the real world their is a lot of competition, if you are not quite good or a slacker then someone is willing to take your place.