Bounty and too many participants

[babay_ko]

I think that more than just members of the bounty campaigns. But there are more and more  bounty of campaigns , it's harder to bleed the account to a newbieon bitcointalk.org, so everything is fine, I think everything will be as before just harder to find a normal bounty.

[1715242618]

1715242618

[pelumi20]

Bounty campaigns is becoming more and more popular everyday, this means that small profit for existing hunters.
But I don't see this as a issue for signature bounty because their are a lot of bounty everywhere and you are only eligible to participate in one at a time.

[jdeanne92]

And also. Some participants are cheating. Some users  have multiple accounts participated in one bounty. and the result will, he/she will get much more prize. These act should be looked carefully

[mrspumpkin]

Bounty campaigns is becoming more and more popular everyday, this means that small profit for existing hunters.
But I don't see this as a issue for signature bounty because their are a lot of bounty everywhere and you are only eligible to participate in one at a time.

I also believe that signature campaigns suffer less than other types of bounty. Before the introduction of the merit system, such a danger was. But now we should not expect such a large number of influx of newcomers

[miklesm]

I think all the Bounty campaigns must have a participants limit in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It is also a good idea to make a rating of bountyhunters to let the project select only the best for their companies, but I can't imagine how it could be realized.

[drippx]

I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns. Probably it's better to look into translation and content campaigns as they require more work

[Jicokh79]

With less time and more profit, it brings a competitive market so everyone wants to have money. The money will be divided among many and the number of rewards is less. Nothing makes money easy.

[777Jolami]

I think all Bounty campaigns must have a participant limit to provide a good reward for everyone. You might be better off reviewing campaigns and content because they need broad exposure, so that the campaign is well known and used. Campaigns are becoming more and more popular as it attracts many bounty hunters, as it is a good source of income for everyone.

[Hzero]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

as I know bounty participant always increase every month. and yes, especially for media social campaign. I think every bounty manager need to put new rules about the limit participant, cause I'm very sure that will always increase every time.

[Ann Impas]

Bounty campaigns is becoming more and more popular everyday, this means that small profit for existing hunters.
But I don't see this as a issue for signature bounty because their are a lot of bounty everywhere and you are only eligible to participate in one at a time.

I also believe that signature campaigns suffer less than other types of bounty. Before the introduction of the merit system, such a danger was. But now we should not expect such a large number of influx of newcomers

Yes, because merits really lemits everyone now. Imagine posting a lot of post but your merit is to low, you will just remain a member for a very long period of time and you will be paid on that particular rank. Currently bounty for sure will be more value oriented because of merit system. Many bounty campaigns as well limits their bounty members to a certain number to avoid over proportional of rewards.

[crestella]

So from this we must be diligent to open bounty so we do not miss a good bounty for us to follow, we also have to revise from bounty it is worth to follow or not, because now most bounty scam.

[itssawai]

Bounty participants are increasing but the number of ICO and bounty program are also increasing, everyday we see some ICO comes up with their bounty program, also many of them have a limit of participation. Crypto field is still evolving and will continue for next few years. We'll see some awesome new bounties as well. This is rapid adaption of technology, which is more beneficial rather than not beneficial in my point of view.

[Saisher]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Do we need regulation? the bounty managers already regulated and laid out the rules on the campaign they are running, if you are bounty participants, you will see that they laid qualifications on who can join and how many people can participate, if you are earning less because to many are joining why not give up the campaign and join other campaign.

[Bitbitmaker]

Bounty is meanly used for promotions for an ICO’s. There are many bounties to grab, the opportunity is huge. Select the good bounty and participant in promotional activities.

[biddicoin]

I think all the Bounty campaigns must have a participants limit in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It is also a good idea to make a rating of bountyhunters to let the project select only the best for their companies, but I can't imagine how it could be realized.

first of all, we must know what is the purpose of bounty
yes the purpose is promoting project, so if it has many participants mean good. vice cersa

[IraKit]

I participate in only the bounty of those ICO that interest me and in which I want to invest. Through communication on the forum you can learn a lot of new information and, therefore, I don't care how many people participate in the Bounty campaigns.

[backbon]

is good for project, more people more promotion and awareness for ico project to get Goal.

[dhka]

Bounty campaigns is becoming more and more popular everyday, this means that small profit for existing hunters.
But I don't see this as a issue for signature bounty because their are a lot of bounty everywhere and you are only eligible to participate in one at a time.

The problem is the growth of new campaign is not sufficient compared to the growth of its hunters
Even worse, there are many people abusing their social media. One person has like 10 or 20 twitter accounts and using it all for joining bounty

[Evgenius1283]

I think, that endlessly people not will added, sooner or later many will not interestingly, who not is scaled. On the other hand, there are a lot of things to do in bounty and not with Facebook and Twitter, make up and make quality content, there is no field smelled.

[BitProCoin]

I think the number of participants in the bounty campaigns will be more and more numerous, because they are becoming increasingly popular. From my egoistic perspective as a bounty hunter, I would like to limit the number of participants, especially in those campaigns where the pool is small.