Bounty and too many participants

[minhdang2212]

But if you ask KYC is also very risky, when your information may be leaked. Thinking bounty programs should limit the number, who early registration is preferred

[1715674494]

1715674494

[1715674494]

1715674494

[tonylewisverdu]

bounty campaigns are all about spreading the word and creating big numbers so they will never regulate the way you ask. several are rewarding those that create the largest hype or bigger numbers so thats the way they reward the 'quality' bounty hunters.

[OrcaTech]

now we see huge amount of bad-quality participants in all campaigns,especially in Social Media and Content Creation. But because of big amount of participants bounty campaign is a good way to new project anyway
It would be great,if every project use KYC for Bounty participants, it would reduce the amount of fake participants in this industry

This is not very great, kyc registration repels many participants, because first of all we are attracted by our anonymity and anonymity of cryptocurrencies!

[Elismoon]

It will be very hard to control. I want to have a good rewards too. I will be very happy if there is a regulation that will give us a fair rewards. Considering that there are a lot of bounty campaign now.

[DiabolicAnt]

The situation was quite obvious - there's no limitations with making accounts at twitter and facebook - so, yes, this type of bounty is going down and down...

[malibogako2018]

If there's many participants i think there are lot of opportunity to success an ico's so we bounty hunters will make a profit because too many bounty hunters endorsing the ico's it's okay that the will be rewards is fairly small atleast we have a profit than the ico will not success and our efforts will be no value.

[BOUNTY.GOLD]

Absolutely yes, bounty campaigns are popular than ICO, Many people choose to join bounty campaign because it is easier from them most of all the active in the social media like Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. They choose to join this because they think they will start easy.

[pinoyden]

That's very true.. Buh I don't think there will be a way to reduce the number of participants except if dey out the number of people they want to accept

Most bounty participants do their job well. Can you make Bitcoin just by not doing your job? The worker must always do their job correctly, it doesn't matter how many people are working in it.

no. Not all because most of bounty participants are freakin lazy and they do not do their task verry well. most of them do only post bursting and completing the post in almost a day or two and if not , they complete the quota one or two days before the deadline. that is why most managers are black listing them and banning them to their future campaigns.

 This is only the way that you can get a free spot if your always late joining a campaign.

[xk85jq]

      Right now , too many participant are like to join on bounty campaign. they are thinking we can earn from this campaign.
      But if you like to join, be learn first before to join, bounty is not easy work but if you comply all thats called money back for work
      In the other side you must choose good company some of them are scamers you better watch out.
     

[alrez]

We can not prevent new arrivals in the bounty world, because in this world all the fields have increasingly intense competition. It's good we look for gaps or other opportunities that better and match our interests and interests. Because such a thing is inevitable.

[Olajide Olaoluwa]

One cannot stop others from joining bounties because they also want to make money. It's becoming more competitive for all bounty hunters.

[imstillthebest]

There's no way to reduce the participant of bounty campaign. Because everyday there's also a new member that joined Bitcointalk.
The only way to reduce it is using KYC procedure, so we can now the detailed people information who joined bounty.
Also with using KYC procedure we can reduce the number of fake people, multiple regis, and many more.

i agree with that idea. kyc is indeed verry useful in order to eliminate those fake account and kyc is verry popular nowadays in terms of cryptocurrency but we also know that we need privacy and we should never expose our identity or give our important infos because crypto currency means anonimity or being private.  


besides there were too many bounty everyday that we can join , so i guess there is really nothing to worry about this issue. You can always join other bounty if you cant be accepted to the other one.


participants wont really matter because what matter the most is the allocated funds for the project. some bounty allocates big reward even though they require too many members but there are also some  that limits their participants in order to maximize the rewards.

[dtimmy]

Yes. Everyone has been looking for a way to make Money. And one means is to participate in bounty. And these makes it more competitive. And ICO is becoming much also

[miltonpogi]

Based on what I've see many people choose bounty rather that airdrops because they see that it is more easy to make,  telegram, Instagram and twitter bounty are the good example that many individuals are doing right now, and because of this popularity of bounty it is bitter if we need to have a regulation in order to avoid malicious transaction and anonymity.

[qiwoman2]

I had another idea. They should limit how many people can join from a specific country or region. If you got like a shit ton of cheaters from Vietnam taking place in the bounties. I found 5 in just the last 3 days using my name to cheat and get telegram stakes, then that way you limit the amount of cheaters as well. Say only 300 maximum from each country should apply. I think something like this will limit the mafia from developing countries stealing all the bounties from those who really need it and are willing to work hard to earn their stakes.

[Norihiro]

I participate in signature campaigns for more than half of a year - and yes, the number of participants slightly increased, but profits are still good.

[goku19]

You are correct that social media bounties have became close to useless now days and with signature campaign we can join only one campaign at a tme to reward in bounties is getting limited with time... that’s why I am happy with this merit system so that not any spammer will become senior member and take that place

[kjnfmplm]

What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards.

Yes, I agree with you. There are lots of members who wants to join Signature, Bounty, Twitter and Facebook campaigns. Because, bitcoin is getting more popular. And eventually will research about it, and end up being a member of the forum. It is hard to spot some good campaigns today. Since most of them is either low-paying or not too reliable. That's why I always do a background check to who are the campaign managers of the campaign that I will join.

also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.

I think it's because of the fact that it is less risky than investing your money on some ICO.

I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think that it depends on the campaign managers. That's why it is better to have good managers on each and every campaigns. Some campaigns have strict rules and requirements to be met. Some does not accept users lower than Hero Member, and that cut offs the possible members in the campaign, that's why it is high-paying. But I don't see why it should be made stricter. You just need to take a lot of time browsing through the Bounties to find some good campaigns.

[tak rogi]

for the problem I prefer more participants because the supporters of the project will be automated ico on the project will be easy to succeed and the participants can avoid the project to be scam.

[denisaardelean]

 It would help to grow the economy but in the other hand for bounty hunters this not good. To maintain the high reward so we have no choice to up our ranks, increase our followers, improve our skills. In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project