Bounty and too many participants

[StevenPop]

It is a campaign that is offering free coins just for posting and doing some other minor things, of course there will be a lot of people that are involved in it. The project managers aren't complaining though, because with more people it means more publicity which is exactly the reason that they are doing the bounty campaigns in the first place.

[greenklo]

I advise you to participate in the bounty in which there is a limit on the number of participants.  Or find a bounty where there are few participants.

[osasshem]

I don't really think the regulation will be of any much effect, cause there are other places for the bounty campaigns, like the bounty signature campaign, reddit, LinkedIn, YouTube, medium etc. Its just that the twitter and Facebook campaigns are more easy to take part in, which leads to too much participants and that gives low rewards to the participants.

[Yalovtsev]

I try the projects where many participants,from 1000 and above do not participate,as even if you make a hard cap,it usually will eventually fill a penny,all depends on the participants,so the less the more Goodies you can earn,so you need to choose wisely bounty

[trrewqs]

Yes indeed. More and more people will find out about the bounty. This has a bad effect on profitability, but for project developers it's better, when there are many participants

[seandiumx20]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

That's why it's preferable to join in signature campaigns than twitter or facebook campaigns. Bounty managers today limits the participants in signature campaign, it is rare to have a signature campaign that has a requirement jr member above. The minimum rank is member and it limits to a specific participant only.

[Krabat]

Yes, this is actually a big problem. And many more projects refuse to pay what they promised. I think that soon the number of people who will continue to participate in this can greatly decrease.

[debianbro]

I advise you not to participate in such bounty.  You will spend your time and get very few coins.  It is better to find a bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants.

[NORD YGGDRASIL]

A large number of participants is not the biggest problem that exists. More importantly, many Bounty managers cheat people when it comes time to pay.

[NikkiS]

Yes, this is actually a big problem. And many more projects refuse to pay what they promised. I think that soon the number of people who will continue to participate in this can greatly decrease.

the number of people is unlikely to significantly decrease. maybe most people can leave who have been in bounty for a long time and saw completely different figures in their wallets. For beginners this is an additional income, many and small amounts are satisfied.

[machine1667]

It depends. There're campaigns that are full of participants but not others, you just have to try to find the most profitable ones for each one. The bounties are becoming more popular every day. I believe that the number will continue to increase.

[crypto vlad]

too many participants in a bounty will certainly make the total salary less because the total allocation fund divided by many participants. I hope the bounty participant that I follow is a little because it will make me get more salary.

[Harlen.t]

I think there will be more and more participation in the bounty, because they are becoming more and more popular. From my point of view as a bounty hunter, I want to limit the number of participants, especially in those small pools. But I don't think it's fair. Don't forget, what we are doing is targeting the marketing and promotion activities of our company, and the company will be interested in more ads, the better. So I don't think they're very interested in limiting the number of participants.

[vasilvas15]

This type of earnings is becoming more popular, and many people are willing to participate. But, like everywhere else, only the more educated and experienced will make good money.

[ven7net]

Yes you are right. More and more people are becoming bounty members. But there is one important point. Basically, most of the participants are looking for easy terms of participation and mostly go through special services and sites where the work is semi-automated. But where conditions are more complicated or where you need to spend time studying, there are always few participants and higher earnings. I am sure that this situation will remain, as there are very few active people, and the total mass will run in search of easy conditions for participation.

[Abarov]

I think this is not a problem. For the company it is very advantageous that more people are aware of the company and more often talked about it. And for the bounty the conditions are changing more and more often.

[eltito]

one of the criteria take note: if the project has no limitations on the participants, and there are a lot of them, it is worth thinking about the fact that you will earn very little.

[rudyconsl15]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

bounty is getting more popular nowadays. but I am not so worried about the increase of bounty participants. because I think it will also affect the success of the project. the merit system already makes bounty more strictly in my opinion.

[alex_andr25]

Social networks have already ceased to be so profitable and participate in them do not see the point, it is due to the fact that there are very simple conditions, well, to make retweet or repost much effort is not necessary, for this much will not be paid. Now the most lucrative, personally behaved, I allocate subscription companies, usually it is allocated the most tokens and the system of rates allows to earn so well. Another subscription does not exceed 200 participants, which pleases.

[triclinics21]

Awards for people are a morale for lost money
I lost a lot of money, and at least he's making up for it.