There will be near to 100 slots for this campaign. We are very close now. Will be adding a few more users tonight.
I wanted to touch on a few issues that i'm reading in this thread. Obviously I am seeing users who are not accepting decisions very easily. The users that are selected are at my discretion. If Tony wants a certain user added, he is free to message me and we can work that is at out. Otherwise it is
MY DECISION.
I don't normally give a response to everyone who was passed over for the simple fact that I would be answering those inquiries for weeks on end per campaign. Everyone who is denied is generally in 1 of these categories. 1. Not an active poster 2. Alt account found on the alt list located in the reputation section. 3. Shitposter 4. Spammer or burstposter 5. uses account for giveaway claims and twitter claims only.
I will explain examples of 2 users who have applied in this campaign.
Here is 5 of majestymages posts on the 1st page of his posts profile. A whole ton of 1 liner trash. he has been active 6 whole days of the month
march 3rd 4th 7th 19th 23rd 24th
Then User boombooms activity just on the 1st page of his posts goes feb 10th, then a 2 week break and he posts on feb 25th, then another 2 week + break and posts march 12, then a few posts on mar 14th, 2 posts on the 19th, 1 post on 21st and now active a lil whining in byteball thread
I'd like to think i'm doing my job just fine
I have been doing this for awhile
I dont make any damn money hiring users who arent going to qualify weekly
so of course im looking for active accounts in order to make the job worth it for me.
I'm not trying to just be a dick to everyone. I am trying to pick the most active people period. I don't know who has or has not been a faithful byteball supporter the whole way. I only pay attention to projects when I am working on them. If you or your account was active and posting well, you'd have been selected. Don't go shouting out complaints that are your own faults.
A few slots remain. I have updated the sheet with a few more users. Some of those users post counts were edited from what was in the application.Your decision needs to be based upon solid transparent criteria and then after that those that comply are on a first come first served basis.
Also when taking on a signature campaign like this one that is not at the outset of the project they special consideration should be given to proven long term community memebers who have extra incentive to see the project succeed and not just dump the coins.
I would have a full transparent explanation of my own personal account being refused acceptance here in public so that I may examine it.
It is simple you do not get to pick and choose it is a first come first served basis as long as the transparent criteria is met. Otherwise the entire distribution is open to scamming. Who is to say you do not own some of the accounts you accept, who is to say they are not paying you kick backs etc etc.
It simply HAS to be first come first served and if criteria is met they get accepted.
I would like a full professional response to my posts asap.
There is no room for picking and choosing outside of a set criteria. As i have said it is part of the distribution process and therefore having it open to your sole picking and choosing means that the distribution is fully open to scamming and manipulation.
I hope you are grasping the gravity of saying you get to pick and choose with no open and transparent criteria.
Too add to this I have NEVER been over looked for a signature campaign period so there is certainly something strange/dubious about your selection process.
Too add to this I would ask others who have GENUINE concerns for being over looked here to come forward with sensible verifiable argument as to why you should not have been over looked.
I think it would make sense for a list to be compiled of accounts that fail the criteria so they need not be checked again in future, it would also make people think long and hard before even apply for sig campaigns.
