Reasons why ICOs fail

[autocurently]

The greed of the developers, too, can not be denied . Cryptocurrency is always a risk of losing your investments.

[zulfi125]

The main failure of ICOs is scams of 90% companies and second reason is very low rate in exchanges when launched .

[manyung]

The tokens created must provide practicality in the ecosystem they are in and can increase the network effect. ICO tokens must be part of the company's business model. Many tokens are not practical, and failure is a matter of course.

[crustycrab666]

Ico fails for several reasons, one of which is unrealistic projects, poor marketing strategies, a less solid team. Inexperienced teams can lead to declining selling points of ICO products. So the relationship between developers and investors less closely.

[Bexomol]

many individuals today r need to contrast with the earlier years, they imprudent not doing research and so forth. Individuals r more vigillant and alarm with these ICOs particularly our locale knows with these loads of tricks, one redflag is sufficient reason not to contribute that is the reason the vast majority of these trick ICOs r falling flat

[edwardsolo2021]

A lot of ICOs fail due to different reasons. Most of them do not have a good plan, a working prototype (a good one not just rubbish), long term plan is not good enough.
Another reason is the team. The team of most ICOs do not have the necessary experience and expertise to develop the project. Though the idea might be good but team is very important for the execution.
And some are outright scam that just want to collect money from the public.

[Layers318]

An ICO may fail when it is being managed by inexperienced team members or when panic set in during the sales period. Investors are drawn away from such ICOs. Also an ICO may fail when the idea behind the project is not feasible on the market to attract investors.

[aurelino]

there are many reasons why ICOs fail, as you describe, I think they are not innovating in releasing products and only halfhearted in trying, should work team can work hard and reliable in selling its products, must be good at marketing and read market interest and judge investors are interested in what kind of product, especially now that many ICOs are popping up just to take advantage of other people's money, after they fail to disappear somewhere, everything should start with a good administration and a solid team work.

[leota68646]

I think the fundamental issue is that numerous ICO ventures think more about the promotion, instead of the plan of action or the innovation behind it. These days, financial specialists are getting more astute and they complete an exhaustive keep an eye on ICOs before submitting any capital. Along these lines, I trust the center plan of action must be great and have a decent utilize case first. At the point when this is valid, at that point you should think about the publicity of your undertaking.

[ka4ok1331]

I found that the best reason for that is that most of the projects started their campaign in a bad market situation. If we compare with December last year, we could see that less interesting projects boomed much more, and all because the green market.

[M0N3YMAGNET]

They fail because they planned to fail from the beginning and are tricking people away from their ETH and BTC. Sorry to say.

[ennave123]

For me, I think one of the reason is that most failed ICO is unprepared. The hype of crypto is very high nowadays and more and more people is joining our world, thus new projects were also in a rush which makes them very vulnerable in failure.

[maunbot]

I think because a lot of ico are not ready with the project being done, so the project is immature but ico is already in the market. So there is little miss between project and ico. so many ico will fail because the project is not finished.

[takngantuk]

because already too much ico at this time. last year ico not too much, the result of many successful projects raise funds for project development. now ICO is like a popcorn seller. almost every month there's always ico started. this month I see already there are 10 - 15 projects that started ico

[castiloros]

most existing ICO has a similar concept with others and even with previous predecessors. If it does not have its own advantages not certainly will not be able to generate for this. This sometimes makes the ICO could not succeed because less has good potential in the future. In addition, a growing number of ICO also make investors be divided into many paths to creating ICO successfully. This makes the ICO cannot achieve the minimum result that can be used to create ICO success.

[huanglui]

Most of the projects want to raise necessary funds, not to build new economy. And it is good that nowadays investors are not so credent.

[Leyss]

A lot of different ICO projects have appeared and continue to appear. However, lately I wanted to choose the ICO project to join as a signatory campaign participant and for a long time I could not just pick up anything that stood out from all this. Either the project ideas do not deserve attention, or the conditions of accession do not fit, there are increasingly many additional requirements, or the payment terms are not suitable.
This year it is very difficult to work for the ICO teams, even good projects can not raise enough funds. On the one hand, investors are afraid of numerous fraudulent projects, on the other - in conditions of a general market fall, such investment is not very profitable. In general, until a good market recovery begins, problems with the ICO will continue.

[JeffBrad12]

most existing ICO has a similar concept with others and even with previous predecessors. If it does not have its own advantages not certainly will not be able to generate for this. This sometimes makes the ICO could not succeed because less has good potential in the future. In addition, a growing number of ICO also make investors be divided into many paths to creating ICO successfully. This makes the ICO cannot achieve the minimum result that can be used to create ICO success.

They are only putting a small improvement concept to their new platforms. The majority of copycats are useless right now. Look at there are so many smartcontracts platforms right now but it seems like we need only ethereum platform.,
EOS, ADA, TRON and any other smartcontract platforms are useless. We don't need em' all.

[Sakira72]

Most ICOs fail before they are just here to get the btc and leave. They don't have any real project relating to real life application

[aalborg]

Well, a lot of reasons can happen. First of all, there is an increasing amount of ICOs and it is getting harder to collect hard cap. thus far, majority of them failing and after listing they simply don't have excessive demand for token