Reasons why ICOs fail

[FillJaS]

Unfortunately many ICO's dont have a good idea and team. Most often, investors dont trust them with their money.
I'm not talking about those who simply want to engage in deception and steal investor money.
Only about those ICO's  who for some reason couldnt raise money.

[Zhenka]

I believe that many ICOs are falling because many investors are trying to get their profits right after the release of the token to the exchange. By selling their assets, they thereby make the price less, which at the sale stages during the ICO

[Samolet]

Over the past year, we have seen that many ICOs present promising new technologies to the public. However, many of these companies lack coherent communication with their potential customers. This is due to the general mood in the blockbuster community, which was mainly focused on the technological side of development - "build a project, and people will come themselves." Despite the fact that these ICOs are constantly overtaking each other in technology, they do not spend enough time to assess the needs and desires of the community.

[Mrcharles]

ICO failure is rampant in the cryptocurrency space. Most projects fail to meet their soft cap as a result of their advertising and promotional products which didn't meet the need of the potential investors. In recent months, the most popular reason for ICO failure is the nature of the market which has rendered many ICO's unable to complete their token sale and investor unwilling to purchase tokens.

[steinkopf]

Most investors lost interest in ICOs projects because of a general drop in the price of bitcoin. But I'm sure that a new wave of interest in such a project will begin soon.

[llecrf]

the number of scams currently making the ICO fail, I saw a good project but some of them failed to achieve softcap.I think there are actions to prevent ICO fraud, to provide opportunities for projects that really have good ideas and technology, for the future of cryptocurrency

[jeron31]

All the coins fall down right now, and it's quite normal that ico projects fail. When market will grow, icos will be profitable again.

[adekogbe]

Too many ICOs have complicated issues cases that people find it difficult to understand and in most cases their whitepaper are always cumbersome and a lot less easier to understand.
Even as a bounty project promoter most projects are confusing for me let alone  a person who is new to cryptocurrencies.
I think ICO teams needs to work on the simplicity of their projects in explanation.

Join DeStream ICO: https://destream.io/?referralId=adf52557d7994818a3bf8131262f2179#action=bountyreg

[solkemyu]

Notwithstanding the trick issues, the thought isn't plausible, glitch from the devs group. In fact, the blockchain business is another industry, with relatively unpracticed undertakings, associations, correspondences, scurry and no network bolster. They have lost financial specialist certainty. These are the reasons I surmise that has bigly affected their disappointment.

[tingtingkt]

With the existence of such a case, then no doubt the popularity of ICO became a flawed project which also caused Google to issue a ban on ads related to cryptocurrency.

[donskova29]

think the reason for most of the ICO's failure is because their projects are completely unrelated to the blockchain. Many projects actually do not meet the conditions required by the ICO.

[Zenboble]

As indicated by insights, half of the ICO fizzled (amid or after the crusade), there is as yet a section that has gone into the shadows and essentially isn't reacting. From the perspective of normal business, such measurements are not amazing. Numerous new businesses fall flat. This isn't astonishing, in light of the fact that many make a coin with no thoughts or can not understand everything. Take for instance the DAO venture, which bombed because of low security

[Dulmwer]

I think the awful task thoughts or poor utilize cases will prompt the disappointment of ICOs. As a matter of fact, a standout amongst the most vital things financial specialists should pay special mind to when putting resources into an ICO is regardless of whether a token will have the capacity to pick up client appropriation and be valuable for taking care of issues with its application in reality. Tragically, numerous ventures are essentially awful thoughts from the begin.

[Badu1]

It has not been an easy task for both investors and bounty hunters to invest into ICOs now. Getting relief of all the headaches of being scam, they intend not to invest and ICOs are all failing now.

[freakslot]

I think marketing is the first factor. The ICO now needs more influencers to promote its projects. Subscription campaigns are very important and Content creation is the next important part of the marketing ICO

[runor]

Cases are different, and some ICOs simply do not get the right amount for the development of the project!

[Gandam23]

There are many ICOs out there, but more than 50% of them fail.
From my analogy, could this be the reasons why ICOs fail?
1. Being too complicated:
If you want investors to favour your ICO, make sure they understand your coin offering. Be concise yet interesting, creative yet not too ‘techy’ and try to explain concepts from scratch. Of course, the detail you go into is likely to depend on your target audience.
2. No unique Use case and lack of creativity:
The reality is, ICOs are not straightforward and with new ideas and concepts arising daily, you need to get noticed and that means coming up with some unique Use case
So, before a developer even attempts to launch an ICO or enter the crypto world, ask yourself: "What will make investors choose this particular ICO over a competitor’s ICO?"
I believe the list continues.

It is primarily because they do not reached the hard cap or even the soft cap. It is their target tokens to be sell. And then through advertising and promoting it to the investors we can sell tokens and can reach the hard cap if our project is really promising and it will make investors to encourage investing in IICO.

[outsider25]

In my opinion, the number of ICOs that failed was because they were less precise in making strategies. This strategy starts from planning, implementation and sustainability. Usually the ICO only makes a strategy on planning and implementation. And even so they make it not in detail and mature. The continuity stage is usually not made by ICO in detail so that the ICO coin cannot last long in the market. Therefore, many new coins are plunged into the market every day but also cannot last long in the market. Besides this ICO failure can be caused by fraudulent ICO or fake ICO.

[madoka]

I think it is on account of there is no real interest for the venture. Numerous ICO groups have concocted an undertaking and after that gullibly trust that this venture will change the world and change the universe. Benefits will most likely come. Yet, they never consider what people in general truly needs

[BALIK]

Most ICOs are simply poor investments, that is the reason why they fail. The market right now is extremely difficult to survive in, an ICO would need to have every advantage imaginable in order to attract investment in a deeply bear market. This is why the bulk of projects do not even reach a fraction of their soft cap.