[ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)

[suortti]

what is the different between pool.threeeye.info and stratum.threeeyed.info? Which one i should use?
Every .configs says pool.threeeye and website says stratum.threeeye

[1715120506]

1715120506

[1715120506]

1715120506

[1715120506]

1715120506

[1715120506]

1715120506

[MinermanNC]

When will this coin get listed on a (at least) mid-size exchange? (something like cryptopia) It already has a bigger&more active community than many alts out there. Why are exchanges still ignoring this project? 

Ya that's a great question. Wondering that myself lol

[mindrust]

yup, Binance for example wants one milion (so I've heard) of a coin, before it get's listet. All those exchanges want coins in return of publishing them.

WoW, greedy motherfuckers. Forget it then. Let them eat shit. Let's focus more on the development side. The community will get even bigger and soon they'll have to add this coin because they'll lose money every second if they don't. We'll get atomic swaps soon too and then centralized exchanges will be no more. Let them have their fun while it lasts.

[melpheos]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (enemy 1.5) and the worse   ccminerv0.4(enemy 1.3) is less than 4% but the test is only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Edit : next will be https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

[WickedPigeon]

Running a test with 4 minutes of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

4 minutes? Why 4 minutes, isn't that a little short? Maybe 12 hours.

[jesser509]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Hey I would appreciate if you threw Ravencoin Miner v2.5 into your comparisons

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

[melpheos]

Running a test with 4 minutes of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

4 minutes? Why 4 minutes, isn't that a little short? Maybe 12 hours.

I didn't have the time to correct before you posted. It's 4 miners :p

[melpheos]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Hey I would appreciate if you threw Ravencoin Miner v2.5 into your comparisons

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

Was about to add it to my post. Will probably replace enemy 1.3 in 24 hours

[Falacio]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Very interesting test. I'm using suprminer, and I was very happy. But I'd like to try enemy 1.5. Do you have a link to the release? I coun't find it in github

[Falacio]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Hey I would appreciate if you threw Ravencoin Miner v2.5 into your comparisons

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

I'll give it a try also

[melpheos]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Very interesting test. I'm using suprminer, and I was very happy. But I'd like to try enemy 1.5. Do you have a link to the release? I coun't find it in github

They are all there
https://coinguides.org/ravencoin-x16r-miner-list/

[Falacio]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (1.5) and the worse ccminerv0.4 is less than 4% but the test i only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Very interesting test. I'm using suprminer, and I was very happy. But I'd like to try enemy 1.5. Do you have a link to the release? I coun't find it in github

The are all there
https://coinguides.org/ravencoin-x16r-miner-list/

Thanks for the link. But I don't like closed sources...
I've just donwloaded both Ravencoin Miner and Zealot/Enemy and only this one made nod32 pop up.
Both being a zip with a miner inside...

[GTX2070]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (enemy 1.5) and the worse  ccminerv0.4(enemy 1.3) is less than 4% but the test is only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Edit : next will be https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

Thank you. And what do you say about the miner A1_min3r

[okamuwf]

check this comparion

https://ravenforum.org/topic/25/a1-vs-suprminer-vs-nevermore-vs-enemy-1-04/3

changing my rigs to supr 1.6

[melpheos]

Running a test with 4 different miners of my rigs 6*1070ti 70% 200/600
suprminer 1.6
enemy 1.3
enemy 1.5 (dev fee 1%)
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 which shows as 2.2.5

Following address for result. Currently Enemy 1.5 wins.
The difference between the best (enemy 1.5) and the worse  ccminerv0.4(enemy 1.3) is less than 4% but the test is only 24 hours so i need to wait to get more accurate data.
The difference not being too large i'll let it run for a few more days.

suprminer 1.6 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RK4sggMC5JCikjmx87U4ocFvmcLitiQ3jc
Enemy 1.5 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQJdZCc3GPCARPRzCgDUmXb2X2HHx7csnv
Enemy 1.3 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RDvuNay9x4E6DnbxUrSBzW3sP4sDmWXLj4
ccminerx16rx16sv0.4 https://ravenminer.com/?address=RQyqEs27NNe5cEbGb4FdHDm9iQ3Uhno1NT

If you have other version you know are performing well let me know and i can test it over a few days if the difference is not too large on the downside

Edit : next will be https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases

Thank you. And what do you say about the miner A1_min3r

Sure will test it as well in 24 hours

[melpheos]

check this comparion

https://ravenforum.org/topic/25/a1-vs-suprminer-vs-nevermore-vs-enemy-1-04/3

changing my rigs to supr 1.6

My test is with 70% and 1070ti.
The best thing you should do is run your rigs with your settings and see which one is more profitable.
Each rig is different (different drivers, different card, different OS, different patch of OS etc...)
Anything can affect your results.
In one configuration one miner will win, in another, another miner will win.
External tests should be taken only for reference.

[melpheos]

Looks like something is broken on ravenminer...
The hashrate is going down like a brick for no specific reason
edit : the port on which i was is full, moved to another port

[BiteByte]

When will this coin get listed on a (at least) mid-size exchange? (something like cryptopia) It already has a bigger&more active community than many alts out there. Why are exchanges still ignoring this project? 

If we want it on the exchanges faster one of the community members is needed. The Dev team want this to succeed as a decentralised project and it won't be if they are relied on.

From @BruceFenton
@everyone Volunteers wanted:  Volunteer to serve as liaison to exchanges.  Ravencoin is receiving a LOT of requests and interest from exchanges.  Unfortunately most request that an "official" representative contact them. Since this is decentralized and open source there is no official and there is no one "authorized" to deal with exchanges.

If someone from the community wants to volunteer to serve this role they can.
Should be knowledgeable about tech/ dev and exchanges and able to help exchanges with tech issues, integration etc.

[dimpsk]

Hi

i have had same problem with ThreeEyed  no payements last few days at all, and share total keeps resetting, moved to http://yiimp.eu for time being

and again hope i get coins they owe me, this like third pool for this coin now

I have same problem.  Immature: 3828 rvn
Official Community Pool - scam?

That bloody scamers pay nothing around a week.

[magicsys.nw]

Hi

i have had same problem with ThreeEyed  no payements last few days at all, and share total keeps resetting, moved to http://yiimp.eu for time being

and again hope i get coins they owe me, this like third pool for this coin now

I have same problem.  Immature: 3828 rvn
Official Community Pool - scam?

That bloody scamers pay nothing around a week.

The same shit here Immature: 6148
Remove this from the list on first page.