polsska
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 06:49:51 AM |
|
3x RX 550 2GB (core 1315MHz, mem 2050MHz), Driver 18.10.2, Windows 10 1809 XMR v8 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 246.37 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 256.64 h/s - Total GPU 0: 503.01 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 246.37 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 249.34 h/s - Total GPU 2: 495.70 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 240.69 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 250.77 h/s - Total GPU 3: 491.46 h/s 07:43:27 | Total: 1490.16 h/s - Max: 1490.16 h/s conf "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":432 }, ]
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
November 04, 2018, 07:39:23 AM |
|
3x RX 550 2GB (core 1315MHz, mem 2050MHz), Driver 18.10.2, Windows 10 1809 XMR v8 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 246.37 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 256.64 h/s - Total GPU 0: 503.01 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 246.37 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 249.34 h/s - Total GPU 2: 495.70 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 240.69 h/s 07:43:27 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 250.77 h/s - Total GPU 3: 491.46 h/s 07:43:27 | Total: 1490.16 h/s - Max: 1490.16 h/s conf "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":432 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":432 }, ] You can lower worksize to 8. It can increase speed.
|
|
|
|
polsska
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 07:45:40 AM |
|
You can lower worksize to 8. It can increase speed.
When I use 8 I have a drop Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 195.38 h/s 08:42:45 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 179.61 h/s - Total GPU 0: 374.98 h/s 08:42:45 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 169.73 h/s 08:42:45 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 195.38 h/s - Total GPU 2: 365.10 h/s 08:42:45 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 185.62 h/s 08:42:45 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 180.80 h/s - Total GPU 3: 366.42 h/s 08:42:45 | Total: 1106.50 h/s - Max: 1144.25 h/s
|
|
|
|
Lno
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 08:09:33 AM |
|
what is the config for vega56? 5*vega56 = 8500 on srb 9100
|
|
|
|
smparo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 08:32:23 AM |
|
Can someone share a working configuration (gpu and mem clock/v and config) for v8 for rx580 8Gb/4Gb? On v6-v7 I have made a configurations but with v8 I'm unable to get one that stay stable!!! Actualy I'm on 1150gpu/2000mem/850mv and { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "index" : X, "multi_hash":1696 } for 8Gb (doublethread) { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "index" : X, "multi_hash":944 } for 4Gb (doublethread) Whit this configuration I can get 950h/s on 0.33b4 I also did some test for bittube but also here I don't reached a stable configuration! The system sometimes crash during the job (the card that goes into error changes almost every time) other times the miner start and stop immediately after connection with the pool (for this problem I think a problem with a card but it don't write which card goes wrong). For all this problem I create this scheduled task procedure (win10): if something goes wrong the system restart itself (on startup I have the bat that start a miner process, usually or your or phoenixminer) @ECHO OFF
rem exit
SETLOCAL EnableExtensions set EXE=jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
set EXE=PhoenixMiner.exe FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
set EXE=SRBMiner-CN.exe FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
echo Mining process is not running, restarting windows... ping 127.0.0.1 -n 30 > nul shutdown /r /t 60
goto END
:FOUND echo %EXE% is running ping 127.0.0.1 -n 3 > nul goto QUIT
:END ping 127.0.0.1 -n 5 > nul rem pause
:QUIT exit
|
|
|
|
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
November 04, 2018, 10:24:14 AM |
|
Please give the full command line you used so I can understand. Just replace your wallet (parameter -u) by XXX to stay anonymous
./start.sh --archi skylake -o XXXXXXX -u XXXXXXXXXXX -p X -c config.txt Got it, --archi is a hint for the --auto mode, since you use the manual config, you cannot use it "cpu_threads_conf" : [ { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 0, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":2 }, { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":2 }, .... { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" :23, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":2 }, ] See the "auto" tokens in my example? That's where you can put "skylake" instead. But the performance change will be null or negligible on such a fast CPU, the manual architecture has an impact on slow CPUs like Core2 or Athlon. Better keep "auto". Lermite kindly provided optimal config for RX570, it may be good on RX580 too. Using 100% memory is good for CN-Heavy but not always for CN-v8 RX570 4G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, ] RX570 8G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, ]
|
|
|
|
Pencila
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 11:06:30 AM |
|
Can anybody share the config setting for AMD R9 290 for CNV8?
|
|
|
|
BluePowder
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 203
Merit: 3
|
|
November 04, 2018, 04:22:33 PM |
|
GPU thread
Do you have any miner for Linux at the moment ?? I have a few 7970 cards but only have ubuntu 14-16 as OS.
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
November 04, 2018, 04:59:56 PM |
|
Lermite kindly provided optimal config for RX570, it may be good on RX580 too. Using 100% memory is good for CN-Heavy but not always for CN-v8 RX570 4G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, ] RX570 8G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, ] For my 2 RX 580 8G cards best multi_hash parameters for v8 are multiples of 96. Such as 1104, 1200 etc. Higher - speeder. Best is 1680, 1776 and 1872.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
November 04, 2018, 05:30:25 PM |
|
I read the last few pages and couldn't find any info but anyone here manage to run the Tahiti or the Hawaii GPUs with this miner?
The Tahiti being the 7950 7970 280X and Hawaii being 290 390 295
So far the Pitcairn speeds are impressive basically what I get with my Tahiti with XMR Stak.
|
|
|
|
smparo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 05:35:14 PM |
|
Lermite kindly provided optimal config for RX570, it may be good on RX580 too. Using 100% memory is good for CN-Heavy but not always for CN-v8 RX570 4G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, ] RX570 8G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, ] For my 2 RX 580 8G cards best multi_hash parameters for v8 are multiples of 96. Such as 1104, 1200 etc. Higher - speeder. Best is 1680, 1776 and 1872. If I can ask, which value do you have set for gpu MHz, mem MHz and voltage? Now I'm on 1680 for multihash (above this value after some time it crash...) and 1150MHz/2000MHz/850mv for GPU setting... since a couple of hours it works without crashing I'm getting in the same card from 910 to 960MH/s... I do not understand, however, why the value move up and down so much
|
|
|
|
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
November 04, 2018, 07:44:36 PM |
|
Breaking changeWhen I started JCE-GPU, my competitors where SRB and Claymore. The JCE fees were aligned with SRB (0.9%) on purpose. Now the game has changed, Claymore is obsolete and the lead in performances is TeamRed. I'm getting on-par with him on v8, but i still lacked a decent implementation for Heavy-class to completely outperform SRB, leave it behind and have only one real competitor. I'm like Stalin, i avoid having two opponents at the same time. Dedicated to UnclWish who asked for it for a long time, here comes... JCE GPU 0.33b5 with +20% performance on Heavy/Haven/TubeTested on both HD7000 and RX cards, with perfs in the range +15% to +25% My HD7950 jumped from 335 to 415, my RX560 from 340 to 400 The bad news is that the fees are now aligned with TeamRed, at 2.1% (still a bit below their 2.5%) but only on Heavy-class algos, where the extra perf deserve them. On CN and CN-light, that's still 0.9%. If mixed with CPU, it's a weighted average, as before. 0.33b5 GPUHuge performance boost for Heavy/HVX/Tube Respective fees increased to 2.1% Very light perf boost for CN-v8
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
|
November 04, 2018, 08:31:21 PM |
|
0.33b5 GPU Huge performance boost for Heavy/HVX/Tube Respective fees increased to 2.1% Very light perf boost for CN-v8
Still get the same abort Abort was called at 348 line in file: d:\qb\workspace\19992\src\vpg-compute-neo\runtime\os_interface\windows\wddm\wddm.cpp EDIT: Nvm just read that iGPU are detected too now. Had to change gpu indexes in config file.
|
|
|
|
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
November 04, 2018, 08:33:20 PM Last edit: November 04, 2018, 08:47:42 PM by JCE-Miner |
|
https://github.com/jceminer/cn_gpu_miner/blob/master/README.md#troubleshootinglast question You have an Intel IPG/GPU in your computer, don't you? Do you have any miner for Linux at the moment ?? I have a few 7970 cards but only have ubuntu 14-16 as OS. For CPU yes, but not GPU, and this is very unlikely regarding how little time i can allow to Linux versions. Even the CPU versions are less often updated than the Windows ones.
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
|
November 04, 2018, 08:38:56 PM |
|
yea i was reading notes. Figured that out. was editing my own post .
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
November 04, 2018, 09:10:30 PM |
|
Breaking changeWhen I started JCE-GPU, my competitors where SRB and Claymore. The JCE fees were aligned with SRB (0.9%) on purpose. Now the game has changed, Claymore is obsolete and the lead in performances is TeamRed. I'm getting on-par with him on v8, but i still lacked a decent implementation for Heavy-class to completely outperform SRB, leave it behind and have only one real competitor. I'm like Stalin, i avoid having two opponents at the same time. Dedicated to UnclWish who asked for it for a long time, here comes... JCE GPU 0.33b5 with +20% performance on Heavy/Haven/TubeTested on both HD7000 and RX cards, with perfs in the range +15% to +25% My HD7950 jumped from 335 to 415, my RX560 from 340 to 400 The bad news is that the fees are now aligned with TeamRed, at 2.1% (still a bit below their 2.5%) but only on Heavy-class algos, where the extra perf deserve them. On CN and CN-light, that's still 0.9%. If mixed with CPU, it's a weighted average, as before. 0.33b5 GPUHuge performance boost for Heavy/HVX/Tube Respective fees increased to 2.1% Very light perf boost for CN-v8
Ok, thanx! Let's try new version... Settings is the same as in prev versions, I hope...
|
|
|
|
vmozara
Member
Offline
Activity: 190
Merit: 59
|
|
November 04, 2018, 10:02:03 PM |
|
Tested with my home pc, easily pulled 1800h/s with 1400 core /1100 mem vega 64 with following: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":960 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":960 }, The consumption of the card seemed far less than cn v8. Probably 2000 can be reached with proper tuning of the card. however i can not test any further, as i just managed to have my rigs running smoothly and tomorrow I am embarking the ship for next 30 days. This ground breaking update comes 1 or 2 days too late for me, I could have switched the rigs to heavy algo and save some power. Now it is too risky for me for testing - any trouble and i can not repair my rigs for 30 days. Well, next time! JCE, great work! see, you can do anything, just need some motivation!
|
|
|
|
Coindgr
|
|
November 04, 2018, 10:14:38 PM |
|
I read the last few pages and couldn't find any info but anyone here manage to run the Tahiti or the Hawaii GPUs with this miner?
The Tahiti being the 7950 7970 280X and Hawaii being 290 390 295
So far the Pitcairn speeds are impressive basically what I get with my Tahiti with XMR Stak.
Anyone? How much you get with 280x?
|
|
|
|
vmozara
Member
Offline
Activity: 190
Merit: 59
|
|
November 04, 2018, 10:17:05 PM |
|
JCE, you should edit the topic name to contain miner version, and also big news like this, to attract more people
|
|
|
|
matheus176
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2018, 10:17:29 PM |
|
Please give the full command line you used so I can understand. Just replace your wallet (parameter -u) by XXX to stay anonymous
./start.sh --archi skylake -o XXXXXXX -u XXXXXXXXXXX -p X -c config.txt Got it, --archi is a hint for the --auto mode, since you use the manual config, you cannot use it "cpu_threads_conf" : [ { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 0, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":2 }, { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":2 }, .... { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" :23, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":2 }, ] See the "auto" tokens in my example? That's where you can put "skylake" instead. But the performance change will be null or negligible on such a fast CPU, the manual architecture has an impact on slow CPUs like Core2 or Athlon. Better keep "auto". Lermite kindly provided optimal config for RX570, it may be good on RX580 too. Using 100% memory is good for CN-Heavy but not always for CN-v8 RX570 4G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 0, "multi_hash": 976 }, ] RX570 8G "gpu_threads_conf": [ { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, { "mode": "GPU", "worksize": 8, "alpha": 64, "beta": 8, "index": 1, "multi_hash": 1008 }, ] oh i tried without --archi but it´s the same error, i don´t know what´s happening the miner is using multi hash but only x2 and even with x2 there´s 16mb l3 cache left for the 20 threads and 8mb for the 24 threads i want to try x3 but the -c parameter always gives this error.
|
|
|
|
|