Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

[maurobiasolo]

It's hard to find a good bounty with few participants: many people are now doing bounty full time and they leave small rooms for the others

[romecheo]

I think the success of one project are not lies on the number of bounty participants, yes, it was good to have many participant for the speed of spreading the news about the project, however, the true success will come from the best team, developer, marketing and adviser, of course the road map should have a clear path.

[muhdatha]

Less or more participants is okay to me. Both has advantage and disadvantage, more bounty participants = more advertising and can pick more investors. less bounty = higher bounty pay (if rewards is it form of stakes).

You are right. It's risky when project has only a few participants. We can think - wow...  this is a Klondaik  But in fact this project might be  less interesting for investors

[Supec77]

Yes, indeed, the number of participants in many Bounties is very different. as for me, I usually prefer those projects where there are fewer participants - it seems that the project is new and therefore not many people know about it yet. and accordingly it seems that there will be large payments. but at the same time, companies with more participants seem to be more stable, which is why many prefer them.

[Boristhecat]

The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?


Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

I have no special preferences on this issue, but when there are not enough participants in the campaign, this raises suspicions. It is obviously painful to participate in a campaign where there are too many participants.

[mandibleclaw]

The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?


Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

Of course I prefer when there are less partecipants but you have to be careful, usually only a few partecipants means that that ICO isn't very attractive for investors and you end up losing your time

[baghdatis1990]

      It does not matter if there are few or many participants. It really matters, to a certain extent. What is important is the project you are taking part in, your goals and potential. But, however, a smaller number of people enrolled in a bounty project can make you a better profit.

[Matilda]

I like a project with real strength and limited bounty participants.Close the Bounty registration channel within two weeks of the end or beginning of the ICO. or limit the number of participants. Some activities are really too many.

[mrcastelo]

I prefer less or limited number of participants to be able to get a bigger share of the bounty pool. Because if a certain bounty has many participants then number of tokens per participants is quite small.

[btctestcolets]

Well, definately i must preferrable to less participants in bounty campaign because it has a big token dividen to be distributed to the successful bounties participants in the end this is because of a few memeber being work and remain during the campaign period.

[yojodojo21]

The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?


Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

If i have a concern to the succes of project it is better to hire more participants so that promotion will be easier and a good way of marketing strategy.
that's the real purpose of of bounty campaign, The Less participant you have in a bounty the lesser fame, attraction and interest you will gain to your project, but if A bounty campaign is sure win win project then there's no need to hire more participants because the project itself will attract whale investors.

[herromerro]

Main idea is participate on solid project. Then less participants. But I wouldn't pass one solid project just because of more participants.

[cryptochr]

I don't pay much attention to the participants in a bounty. I focus on the quality of the project. A good project is likely to attract more participants.

[deadthings]

Ammount of participants are not the most important thing in Bounty. Of course, smaller ammount = bigger profit but not always.

More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam

[Nahl]

i don't mind about less of participants or more participants while enrolling bounties programs because in my opinion the number of participants will not guarantee the particular project will sucessfully or not and as long as the project will sucessfully and the price are decent when listed to the exchange it does not matter for me

[Gelesko]

The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?


Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

I prefer golden middle! As a lot of participants, means you are rewarded less among all of participants, but you can see that the project has high interest from the community! Less participants means more rewards, but you might end up with nothing, as the project will turn out scam or the coin will not get any value, after the ICO finishes! So there is advantages and disadvantages of both more/less participants.

[defoman]

The Bounty Campaign is so hot and great . We can earn a big profit with Bounty Campaigns .
Sometimes , you see some Bounties which have less participants or more participants ? Have you already think about which one do you prefer ?


Less participants / More participants in Bounty - Which one do you prefer ?

I think we should keep the balance. Very often, companies have a small number of participants, because they are not sufficiently covered, which negatively affects the attraction of investments. At the same time, campaigns with a large number of participants often pay very little. Therefore, the most attractive look of bounty, where the payment is fixed for each participant and must be paid in tokens.

[febrian1705]

if in my opinion more participants are better because who get the best gift of him the best .. and with many participants we can learn a lot more. if the little participant is less comfortable in my opinion

[madgtr]

I like bounties that are popular because that probably means that they have a good project to offer and subsequently their coin will have a bigger value in the future.

[Nasty23]

Ammount of participants are not the most important thing in Bounty. Of course, smaller ammount = bigger profit but not always.

More important thins is development team, community etc, because if we do not focus on the most important, we will be able to lose everything when the campaign turns out to be a scam

Yes the amount of the participants is not the most important thing but the project and its development team is very important on which the project can encourage investors to invest and make it successful and the participants of the bounty spread it to the investors to make it popular and support it.