[ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener

[matmator]

d'ont work

[Johnjay06]

Works flawlessly on my 6 1080 ti rig. Pl 75% 0 core +750 men pulling around 320mh

[cloudhax]

after tuning my overclocks I'm sitting quite happy at 53-54Mh on my 1080tis in HiveOS.   impressive.

[kdinx]

I HAVE DONE SOME EXPERIMENT:

to avoid your rig crash while using this meds (if you are a bit unlucky)

1. Run your miner first before applying meds
2. Close your meds first before stopping your miner

Regards,

kdinx

[promomei]

after tuning my overclocks I'm sitting quite happy at 53-54Mh on my 1080tis in HiveOS.   impressive.

Can you share your oc?
My hasrate is not stable 4x1080ti aours. Reporter hs on pool from 175-220... all the time..

on ethermine its normal pix

[Kryptowolf512]

Is it possible to use this with claymore? Want to dual mine with it :/

[B00gieman]

Yes you can, as long as you have 1080 or 1080ti on your Rig.
Works on Ethash and Cryptonight algos.

d'ont work

Lol
Yes. Does not work.
Please keep away. We dont want hash increased.

[Schtroumpf]

i'm using it since weeks now
stable 51,2 mhs on my 1080tis  zotac min PL 72 Core -100 meme +620
many thanks KL Minehan

[tyab66]

Sorry If I missed this in the  22 pages, but looking for a way to control what gpu's it applies to for the revB settings (I see that you can control it per card for revA). Basically I want to only apply to certain cards, ignoring the others.

FYI, it works on Titan Xp's but I am getting new errors so spending time finding new lower stable clock settings.

[cloudhax]

after tuning my overclocks I'm sitting quite happy at 53-54Mh on my 1080tis in HiveOS.   impressive.

Can you share your oc?
My hasrate is not stable 4x1080ti aours. Reporter hs on pool from 175-220... all the time..

HiveOS, 1080ti (various) +0 core, +1400 mem, power limit 180-200w depending on the card.  one of my rigs I have to step up the overclock +600, +1000, +1400 over a few minutes to help initial stability when I first start it up

[androstan1234]

I picked up a 1080ti (zotac amp extreme monstrosity) out of curiosity, just to test this.  I get up close to 55 mhs if I let the PL go up to 75%.  Most efficient setting is 50% PL, 42 mhs for 150W.  That's about as efficient as your average modded polaris.  Pretty solid given the versatility of this gpu for other algos.

With some more tinkering/tweaking, I'm getting about 50 mhs at 175W (hwinfo reading).

mclock +650
cclock -225
pl 55%

[androstan1234]

Tried dualmining kecc.  Pretty crappy results.

[project13et]

Yes, yes, Elio. You’re a big, strong man. Well done on all your achievements and stuff.

After our other launch on the 25th of May (probably a few weeks after), we will have a public release for all cards -  VEGA, GTX and RX included - that everyone can use. It will have a devfee attached to it, if the community agrees,  as it makes more sense and I cannot manage the 200+ clients we already have. We’ll update with new models as it comes out.

I’m fucking off to Oxford, Cambridge for two weeks for a research project, so Bird, AI, Cat or Dog will manage this thread for me.

Would like to know the community thoughts about a devfee tool.

Community thoughts  about a devfee tool? Girl you & your team rock , best in industry. The community is already paying devfee's for software's that do same think like the free one, anything you bring up is a big plus for for the whole crypto community and for small individuals, a dev fee is more then fair!!!

[rusty91]

what's the lowest wattage you managed to squeeze and maintain 50MHs on 1080ti ?

example:
rig 12x rog strix 1080TI, each set to 195W ~ 49-50MHs and doesnt seem to work any more efficient if I squeeze power limit below that. If I just touch the PL, hashrate drops to 46-48...

rig 6x msi gaming x 1080TI- 160W ~ 49 to 51MHs and works steady with 5454MHs mem clocks... power limit set to 200, actual usage 150-160... numbers measured on the wall seem to back up what nvidia-smi says. 

And I can't figure out what's causing such a huge difference... any ideas? I mean - I'm happy, but curious...

biostar tb250, xubuntu 16.04, 384.111, gpuclock offset set to +900, resulting in 5454MHz as reported by nvidia-smi --query-gpu=clocks.current.memory.

[deuce9]

what's the lowest wattage you managed to squeeze and maintain 50MHs on 1080ti ?

example:
rig 12x rog strix 1080TI, each set to 195W ~ 49-50MHs and doesnt seem to work any more efficient if I squeeze power limit below that. If I just touch the PL, hashrate drops to 46-48...

rig 6x msi gaming x 1080TI- 160W ~ 49 to 51MHs and works steady with 5454MHs mem clocks... power limit set to 200, actual usage 150-160... numbers measured on the wall seem to back up what nvidia-smi says.  

And I can't figure out what's causing such a huge difference... any ideas? I mean - I'm happy, but curious...

biostar tb250, xubuntu 16.04, 384.111, gpuclock offset set to +900, resulting in 5454MHz as reported by nvidia-smi --query-gpu=clocks.current.memory.

You need to increase the memory clock more. Im getting 52-53 on 175w(nvidia inspector reading). Memory offset +680

using win10

https://i.imgur.com/40Uhl9s.png

[androstan1234]

what's the lowest wattage you managed to squeeze and maintain 50MHs on 1080ti ?

example:
rig 12x rog strix 1080TI, each set to 195W ~ 49-50MHs and doesnt seem to work any more efficient if I squeeze power limit below that. If I just touch the PL, hashrate drops to 46-48...

rig 6x msi gaming x 1080TI- 160W ~ 49 to 51MHs and works steady with 5454MHs mem clocks... power limit set to 200, actual usage 150-160... numbers measured on the wall seem to back up what nvidia-smi says.  

And I can't figure out what's causing such a huge difference... any ideas? I mean - I'm happy, but curious...

biostar tb250, xubuntu 16.04, 384.111, gpuclock offset set to +900, resulting in 5454MHz as reported by nvidia-smi --query-gpu=clocks.current.memory.

You need to increase the memory clock more. Im getting 52-53 on 175w(nvidia inspector reading). Memory offset +680

using win10

https://i.imgur.com/40Uhl9s.png

Also cclock should be negative.  You're feeding power to wasted gpu cycles when that power could be driving productive mem cycles.

[nitrobg]

It's May 25 - what do you have under your sleeve for us? 

[Etherion]

It there a way to run this with nicehash?

restting the OC. Appling the Pill, running the miner and then appling the OC makes the systems crash when NH switches.

[project13et]

It's May 25 - what do you have under your sleeve for us? 

My browser is on refresh, it's like black friday

[androstan1234]

I picked up a 1080ti (zotac amp extreme monstrosity) out of curiosity, just to test this.  I get up close to 55 mhs if I let the PL go up to 75%.  Most efficient setting is 50% PL, 42 mhs for 150W.  That's about as efficient as your average modded polaris.  Pretty solid given the versatility of this gpu for other algos.

With some more tinkering/tweaking, I'm getting about 50 mhs at 175W (hwinfo reading).

mclock +650
cclock -225
pl 55%

Did some additional tuning this morning.  Getting 51.1 mhs at 175W (hwinfo reading).

mclock +670
cclock -175
pl 55%

About 0.29 Mh/J.

I can get a higher hashrate, up to about 54.5, by feeding a little more power, but the hash/joule ratio isn't as good.