Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 05:12:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 [632] 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761537 times)
jkoil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 834
Merit: 524


Nxt NEM


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:01:26 PM
 #12621

...before starting playing with customers.

Your understanding of cryptocurrencies is jaw-dropping!   Grin

Your understanding of SW development is jaw-dropping!   :-(
utopianfuture
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 268

Internet of Value


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:01:46 PM
 #12622

Blocks Generated   :   3933
Fee Earned   :   60,718 NXT

this is a nicer hack  Roll Eyes

just before source release.. great!!

devs, please take a look into this ASAP, that person just generated another block.  They are obviously gaming the system somehow.  The balance on that acct has never been very high, yet they forge TONS of blocks

all,

remember....


Actually there will be 3 flaws in the source code.


How fast it is ? It is 50 million account and perhaps it is the only big account forging.


░░░░░░▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
░░░░▄████████████████▄
░░▄███████████████████▄
███████████████████████
▐████████████████████████▌
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▐██████████████████████▌
████████████████████████
░░▀████████████████████▀
░░░░▀████████████████▀
░░░░░░▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
  TomoChain  •    •  TomoChain 
░░░░░░▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
░░░░▄████████████████▄
░░▄███████████████████▄
███████████████████████
▐████████████████████████▌
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▐██████████████████████▌
████████████████████████
░░▀████████████████████▀
░░░░▀████████████████▀
░░░░░░▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
rickyjames
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:02:34 PM
 #12623


Dude.  I respectfully ask that you remove this.  We are trying to get Thomas to open up and tell us what happened.  He has made a mistake.  He will work with us if he sees a path to redemption.  This would be a good thing.

Dude (as you say) I have not accused anyone! Im taking a poke at all the fingers poking towards Thomas. We are all very quick to blame before (if) we know all the facts.

With respect I will not remove the image.

Don't care about the image...
But I do care about the implication that he is not to blame at all - facts so far;

Trojan download came from his server for the affected accounts (see posts about browser history)
He admitted - in the previous post in putting the trojan code there.
He denies having used the data that was sent to his server or attempted to be sent in the clear over the internet to steal from the affected accounts.
If we believe the denial I think 'accomplice after the fact' is still applicable...

the other statement 'there are other modified clients out there' is an obvious one I'm sure there are but other wrongdoers do not lessen the severity of this one.

I agree what Thomas did was a very severe bad act.  But there's obviously more to the story here, and he knows it, and we need to find out about it.     Hammering him about how bad he has been will not engender his cooperation.   This is still a salvageable situation as long as the stolen NXT is isolated with the possibility of returning it to its rightful owners.  Thomas is currently saying he cannot do that.  Maybe that is true and maybe not.  I want to hear more from him and I want to offer him a way to minimize the shitstorm he is walking through if he plays ball to accomplish restitution.  If he can't do that, maybe he knows who can.  I hope he will come back onto the site and talk about this, or PM me to discuss privately if he is more comfortable doing that.
pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:02:40 PM
 #12624

nxt need more technical support!

What do you mean?

Pin

S3MKi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016



View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:03:44 PM
 #12625

Blocks Generated   :   3933
Fee Earned   :   60,718 NXT

this is a nicer hack  Roll Eyes

just before source release.. great!!

devs, please take a look into this ASAP, that person just generated another block.  They are obviously gaming the system somehow.  The balance on that acct has never been very high, yet they forge TONS of blocks

all,

remember....


Actually there will be 3 flaws in the source code.


How fast it is ? It is 50 million account and perhaps it is the only big account forging.
it was 128k few minutes ago in blockchain. first transaction was 29/11. But now 24/11 Magic http://clip2net.com/s/6vAqOt
notsoshifty
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:08:27 PM
 #12626

Don't forget Framewood, too.  Please notice the date and how little the community paid attention.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4172532#msg4172532

The issue reported by Framewood was of funds being sent to a different account to the one he entered into the browser, as part of a transaction that he initiated, at the same time as he made the transaction; rather than funds being stolen after having unlocked the account in the browser. I'm not fully up to date with the last few pages, but is it yet confirmed to be the same hacker, or even the same issue (bogus client, not e.g. code bug)?
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:08:45 PM
 #12627

When a client transfers NXT from one account to another, is there any record of the IP Address that is broadcasting this transfer?

No.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:09:30 PM
 #12628


(girls)
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:11:46 PM
 #12629

Nxt Mac 0.18 now available at http://nxtra.org/mac

Only change is inclusion of wellKnownPeers - which I forgot to include in the previous version.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:12:10 PM
 #12630

devs, please take a look into this ASAP, that person just generated another block.  They are obviously gaming the system somehow.  The balance on that acct has never been very high, yet they forge TONS of blocks

Looks legit. 50M, he is supposed to mine each 20th block at 100% base difficulty.
xibeijan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:12:56 PM
 #12631

Nxt Mac 0.18 now available at http://nxtra.org/mac

Only change is inclusion of wellKnownPeers - which I forgot to include in the previous version.

What is Nxt Mac?

Notable projects 2019: Semux, Dero, Wagerr, BEAM
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:15:37 PM
 #12632

Nxt Mac 0.18 now available at http://nxtra.org/mac

Only change is inclusion of wellKnownPeers - which I forgot to include in the previous version.

What is Nxt Mac?

A mac version of the nxt client I made - automatic updates and single click install to make it easy to use.
notsoshifty
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:16:10 PM
 #12633

Blocks Generated   :   3933
Fee Earned   :   60,718 NXT

this is a nicer hack  Roll Eyes

just before source release.. great!!

devs, please take a look into this ASAP, that person just generated another block.  They are obviously gaming the system somehow.  The balance on that acct has never been very high, yet they forge TONS of blocks

all,

remember....


Actually there will be 3 flaws in the source code.


I previously checked the (decompiled) source code and could see where the client checks whether it is eligible to forge (and calls generateBlock if it is). But I couldn't see anywhere where the receiving client polices the forger's right to forge. It gets a processBlock message, and handles it, but seems to trust that the forger was eligible. This could potentially result in a rogue node forging more than its fair share. I am looking at decompiled code (not the real source) and also missing comments etc so almost certainly missing the bigger picture here. Perhaps jl/cfb could quickly confirm.
smartwart
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:20:32 PM
 #12634

People ask why Nxt is not inflationary. Could anyone tell me why it's not inflationary if it's possible to issue other currencies using Asset Exchange? This increases number of "coins" owned by users, right?

interesting question!

at least, inflation is increase of the price.
if we substitute 1nxt by 3btc we have increased the price for one nxt by factor 3:0.0001
... hm ? Undecided ?



this point has to be stressed again and again. You don't issue Bitcoin, litecoin or any other actual assets via colored coin tech. You  merely issue tokens or stickers that represent these coins . It's up to you to add a value on these tokens. They are basically IOU you issue. There would be a lot of uncertainty at the beginning of the asset market to see who can be trusted. Similar issue to the Ripple gateway currently.

some point are worth to be stressed.
assets - that means colored coins are the nxt featured will be released.
I think this can be discussed and is an interesting topic and an exciting technology!

cheers!

NxT: 13574045486980287597
punkrock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 1011



View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:20:54 PM
 #12635

BloodyRookie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:22:49 PM
 #12636

Blocks Generated   :   3933
Fee Earned   :   60,718 NXT

this is a nicer hack  Roll Eyes

just before source release.. great!!

devs, please take a look into this ASAP, that person just generated another block.  They are obviously gaming the system somehow.  The balance on that acct has never been very high, yet they forge TONS of blocks

all,

remember....


Actually there will be 3 flaws in the source code.


I previously checked the (decompiled) source code and could see where the client checks whether it is eligible to forge (and calls generateBlock if it is). But I couldn't see anywhere where the receiving client polices the forger's right to forge. It gets a processBlock message, and handles it, but seems to trust that the forger was eligible. This could potentially result in a rogue node forging more than its fair share. I am looking at decompiled code (not the real source) and also missing comments etc so almost certainly missing the bigger picture here. Perhaps jl/cfb could quickly confirm.


It does get checked in the verifyGenerationSignature method.

Nothing Else Matters
NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ
NXT: 11095639652683007953
opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:23:38 PM
 #12637

I run 9 VPSs, why is it that lots of times, many of them see others as red flags?
xyzzyx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250


I don't really come from outer space.


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:27:01 PM
 #12638

I run 9 VPSs, why is it that lots of times, many of them see others as red flags?

What are your values for maxNumberOfConnectedPublicPeers and maxRequestsPerSec in web.xml?

"An awful lot of code is being written ... in languages that aren't very good by people who don't know what they're doing." -- Barbara Liskov
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:27:11 PM
 #12639

I previously checked the (decompiled) source code and could see where the client checks whether it is eligible to forge (and calls generateBlock if it is). But I couldn't see anywhere where the receiving client polices the forger's right to forge. It gets a processBlock message, and handles it, but seems to trust that the forger was eligible. This could potentially result in a rogue node forging more than its fair share. I am looking at decompiled code (not the real source) and also missing comments etc so almost certainly missing the bigger picture here. Perhaps jl/cfb could quickly confirm.

pushBlock() checks that forger doesn't cheat.
verifyGenerationSignature() called by pushBlock().
landomata
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
January 02, 2014, 05:27:45 PM
 #12640

WHAT TIME (GMT) WILL THE SOURCE CODE BE RELEASED?....ITS ALREADY JAN 3rd IN JAPAN/AUSTRALIA......CHINA IS COMING UP IN 10 MINUTES.

Need an answer too.



Pages: « 1 ... 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 [632] 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!