[ANN]🚀 OPTHERIUM🚀 Synergy of Blockchain solutions

[hina98334]

I agree with you. It is very difficult to determine whether the project will be promising and successful at an early stage. Therefore, investors want to know the project team and what their experiences in carrying out successful projects.

Yes, and in this case, they have to believe the information that is provided on the network, since this can't be verified. But let's hope that the risk justifies the means.

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

When the projects is just start to develop it is very hard to find enough information in internet. That is why it is necessary not to hurry and to wait and see the development, check how the project follow the roadmap.

The way of exposing fraudulent ICOs does not make their number less. Full details of the team should be available for every honest project.

I do not agree with you. With every fraudulent ICO exposed, they are one less.

Now investors have become much more careful to study the projects in which they are going to invest. Already there is no rush when invested in everything.

This is how smart investors should act. They must be sure that their investments will bring them profit in the future.

[1714285600]

1714285600

[1714285600]

1714285600

[flarenial]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project.

[Enyanha]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

Presentation costs a lot of money. Famous persons costs money. Many crypto projects visit different conferencies, meetings. They becomes a sponsors of conferences and find investors offline. The team meet the people, speak with investors.

[lumierre]

I agree with you. It is very difficult to determine whether the project will be promising and successful at an early stage. Therefore, investors want to know the project team and what their experiences in carrying out successful projects.

Yes, and in this case, they have to believe the information that is provided on the network, since this can't be verified. But let's hope that the risk justifies the means.

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

When the projects is just start to develop it is very hard to find enough information in internet. That is why it is necessary not to hurry and to wait and see the development, check how the project follow the roadmap.

The way of exposing fraudulent ICOs does not make their number less. Full details of the team should be available for every honest project.

I do not agree with you. With every fraudulent ICO exposed, they are one less.

Now investors have become much more careful to study the projects in which they are going to invest. Already there is no rush when invested in everything.

It takes time to study. Investors must be good educated and understant the technology of blockhains and the principals of the work of the projects. It is really very difficalt to be a crypto investor.

[PlayInfinity]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project.

This team must have a big money to attrect a famous person. But very often the team just use the name of famous person and the famous person even does not know about the project.

[gaihulkfat]

I agree with you. It is very difficult to determine whether the project will be promising and successful at an early stage. Therefore, investors want to know the project team and what their experiences in carrying out successful projects.

Yes, and in this case, they have to believe the information that is provided on the network, since this can't be verified. But let's hope that the risk justifies the means.

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

When the projects is just start to develop it is very hard to find enough information in internet. That is why it is necessary not to hurry and to wait and see the development, check how the project follow the roadmap.

The way of exposing fraudulent ICOs does not make their number less. Full details of the team should be available for every honest project.

I do not agree with you. With every fraudulent ICO exposed, they are one less.

Now investors have become much more careful to study the projects in which they are going to invest. Already there is no rush when invested in everything.

It takes time to study. Investors must be good educated and understant the technology of blockhains and the principals of the work of the projects. It is really very difficalt to be a crypto investor.

You will not believe it, but investors are investing in projects without understanding all the terms and without delving into the concept. At the very beginning it is difficult to expose fraudulent projects.

[deworlci]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project.

This team must have a big money to attrect a famous person. But very often the team just use the name of famous person and the famous person even does not know about the project.

A famous person will not help the project in productive work, this is just an advertising move.

[upline]

This is how smart investors should act. They must be sure that their investments will bring them profit in the future.

Of course. To do this, they must understand not only the investments, but also have a clear understanding of the issues that the project in which they are going to invest is going to decide.

[darkcerebral]

It is mach more difficult to work in bad market conditions. In 2017 people invested money in all the projects independent from the idea. Now they lost a lot money and simply do not trust all crypto projects. And in such conditions it is really very hard to work.

You talk about a silly mass. At first they believed everything, and then they began to believe nothing. If the cycle repeats, this mass of people will repeat the sequence of actions and emotions. This will always occur in connection with the updating of market participants.

Perhaps this situation may happen again when prices are high. But still I think that such a scale will not be.

[Nasbacyar]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project.

This team must have a big money to attrect a famous person. But very often the team just use the name of famous person and the famous person even does not know about the project.

A famous person will not help the project in productive work, this is just an advertising move.

We talked about the fact that a famous person can not just advertise the project, he will be able to inspire confidence from investors.

[Simonenko1967]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project.

This team must have a big money to attrect a famous person. But very often the team just use the name of famous person and the famous person even does not know about the project.

A famous person will not help the project in productive work, this is just an advertising move.

We talked about the fact that a famous person can not just advertise the project, he will be able to inspire confidence from investors.

If a project can afford to attract a famous person for advertising, it shows only financial opportunities. It is more correct to have people on the development team who have already shown themselves in this area or other projects.

[Svobodniy2019]

f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.

If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential.

If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project.

This team must have a big money to attrect a famous person. But very often the team just use the name of famous person and the famous person even does not know about the project.

A famous person will not help the project in productive work, this is just an advertising move.

We talked about the fact that a famous person can not just advertise the project, he will be able to inspire confidence from investors.

If a project can afford to attract a famous person for advertising, it shows only financial opportunities. It is more correct to have people on the development team who have already shown themselves in this area or other projects.

I believe that a lot of money is being spent on marketing, and that causes investors confusion. Trust in the project is a team of experienced famous people who have been successful in the cryptoindustry.

[PlayInfinity]

Perhaps this situation may happen again when prices are high. But still I think that such a scale will not be.

Market events of this kind are repeated at different intervals. This has been take place on the stock market since the beginning of the 20th century. Thus, the likelihood of a large-scale pump in the crypto market is very high.

Hope the situation that was in 2017 will repeat. Good market conditions help to develop crypto projects a lot. But it was a lot of scum too.

[zarad0]

Now a projects with more money have more opportunities and very often investors prefer that projects that have more aggressive and expensive advertising campagn.

[barabeku]

Now a projects with more money have more opportunities and very often investors prefer that projects that have more aggressive and expensive advertising campagn.

Now there is a very big competition among the crypto projects and of course win the  projects with more advertising, they attract more  funds of investors.

[upline]

Now there is a very big competition among the crypto projects and of course win the  projects with more advertising, they attract more  funds of investors.

Now the investor has become much more selective and advertising is not always a fundamental factor. The work of the team and the idea are important.

[caribbean_dream]

If advertising is used on the general network resources, then this may attract new investors. In this case, the selectivity of experienced investors does not matter .

I think for advertising is very impotrant to visit different meeting and offline conferencies and to meet with investors offline.

[hina98334]

Perhaps this situation may happen again when prices are high. But still I think that such a scale will not be.

Market events of this kind are repeated at different intervals. This has been take place on the stock market since the beginning of the 20th century. Thus, the likelihood of a large-scale pump in the crypto market is very high.

Well, actually, I don’t mind a big pump. I just have time to accumulate cryptoactives.

[flarenial]

Good joke . You say so, as if there are those who are against a large pump.

Well, there are those who say that this will never happen again.

[caribbean_dream]

Good joke . You say so, as if there are those who are against a large pump.

Well, there are those who say that this will never happen again.

They just says that it will never happen again but all of them are waiting a new big pump.