|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8057
'The right to privacy matters'
|
 |
January 03, 2014, 04:55:36 AM |
|
once the software catches up to these sticks they are going to kill. I am getting a steady 2.0 from each one.
These have to be asic miners new block erupters.
they are the exact same size as a block eruptor .
they have the same id as a block erupter.
fried cat = sushi
first sale of 4000 at 45 btc a case
second sale of 20000 at 33 btc a case
new years eve promo at 31 btc a case
made in china
a shit load of commonalities
these sticks rock.
6x the hash at less power and stable.
they will bury the bit fury sticks.. 2 gh at .075btc vs 2.5gh at .25btc not much to think about.
|
|
|
|
Jay_Pal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1493
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 03, 2014, 09:37:26 AM |
|
why do all the reading come as a multiple of 512? (512,1024,1536,2048,2560)
Because the difficulty on the pool is set to 512. If he were mining with any other number, it would be a multiple of it (10, for example): --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):7.060G (avg):6.922Gh/s | A:251830 R:40 HW:4407 WU:94.5/m
ST: 2 SS: 4 NB: 286 LW: 343019 GF: 1 RF: 0
Connected to mmpool.bitparking.com diff 10 with stratum as user user
Block: 0000fd0fc26ae7b2... Diff:1.42G Started: [09:18:29] Best share: 327K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P ]ool management [S ]ettings [D ]isplay options [Q ]uit
BAJ 0: max 35C 3.17V | 4.879G/4.678Gh/s | A:174390 R: 0 HW: 54 WU: 65.3/m
AMU 3: | 335.4M/336.1Mh/s | A: 12660 R: 0 HW: 132 WU: 4.7/m
AMU 6: | 335.7M/335.8Mh/s | A: 11620 R:20 HW: 106 WU: 4.7/m
AMU 7: | 460.3M/448.7Mh/s | A: 12750 R: 0 HW:2944 WU: 4.7/m
AMU 8: | 447.0M/447.8Mh/s | A: 15390 R: 0 HW: 922 WU: 6.0/m
AMU 9: | 335.4M/335.5Mh/s | A: 9960 R:10 HW: 76 WU: 4.7/m
AMU 10: | 335.8M/336.0Mh/s | A: 9820 R:10 HW: 84 WU: 4.5/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-01-01 13:13:49] Accepted 11654ca4 Diff 14/10 BAJ 0 pool 0
[2014-01-03 09:27:12] Accepted 0282785d Diff 102/10 AMU 8 pool 0
[2014-01-03 09:27:20] Accepted 0e032b3f Diff 18/10 AMU 8 pool 0
[2014-01-03 09:27:25] Accepted 05ef3eb5 Diff 43/10 AMU 9 pool 0
[2014-01-03 09:27:26] Accepted 054b87da Diff 48/10 BAJ 0 pool 0
[2014-01-03 09:27:40] Accepted 09651052 Diff 27/10 AMU 3 pool 0 |
|
|
|
|
fasmax
|
|
January 03, 2014, 03:15:18 PM |
|
once the software catches up to these sticks they are going to kill. I am getting a steady 2.0 from each one.
These have to be asic miners new block erupters.
they are the exact same size as a block eruptor .
they have the same id as a block erupter.
fried cat = sushi
first sale of 4000 at 45 btc a case
second sale of 20000 at 33 btc a case
new years eve promo at 31 btc a case
made in china
a shit load of commonalities
these sticks rock.
6x the hash at less power and stable.
they will bury the bit fury sticks.. 2 gh at .075btc vs 2.5gh at .25btc not much to think about.
I only bought 1 unit to experiment with and it has been running stable for over 24 hours on a Rpi. My stats look like this. Average 2.409gh/s A 83568 R 156 HW 369 WU 33.5 I have adjusted the voltage to .9 volts and the clock is set at 300mhz (0B81). BTC guild stats verify the hash rate. Wish I had a more units  |
|
|
|
|
twib2
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
|
January 03, 2014, 03:18:06 PM |
|
I have 4 of these. Two run fine at the predicted hashrate for all frequencies up to 275 (i.e. 2.2 GH/s).
But, two of them consistently run about 1/3 the hashrate they're supposed to, no matter what settings I try, or even if I run them by themselves.
Anybody else see this? And if so, were you able to resolve it? Or do I just have two duds?
|
|
|
|
|
fasmax
|
|
January 03, 2014, 03:32:34 PM |
|
I have 4 of these. Two run fine at the predicted hashrate for all frequencies up to 275 (i.e. 2.2 GH/s).
But, two of them consistently run about 1/3 the hashrate they're supposed to, no matter what settings I try, or even if I run them by themselves.
Anybody else see this? And if so, were you able to resolve it? Or do I just have two duds?
Out of curiosity what are you running them on? Have you tried running them on a different host? |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8057
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:02:18 PM |
|
once the software catches up to these sticks they are going to kill. I am getting a steady 2.0 from each one.
These have to be asic miners new block erupters.
they are the exact same size as a block eruptor .
they have the same id as a block erupter.
fried cat = sushi
first sale of 4000 at 45 btc a case
second sale of 20000 at 33 btc a case
new years eve promo at 31 btc a case
made in china
a shit load of commonalities
these sticks rock.
6x the hash at less power and stable.
they will bury the bit fury sticks.. 2 gh at .075btc vs 2.5gh at .25btc not much to think about.
I only bought 1 unit to experiment with and it has been running stable for over 24 hours on a Rpi. My stats look like this. Average 2.409gh/s A 83568 R 156 HW 369 WU 33.5 I have adjusted the voltage to .9 volts and the clock is set at 300mhz (0B81). BTC guild stats verify the hash rate. Wish I had a more units I know how to up the freq but how did you boost power? I have a lot of 12 volt and 13 volt psu's to use on hubs. I was very pleased to get the 1.98-2.01 gh a stick. but getting 2.4 a stick does sound tempting |
|
|
|
twib2
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:13:12 PM |
|
I have 4 of these. Two run fine at the predicted hashrate for all frequencies up to 275 (i.e. 2.2 GH/s).
But, two of them consistently run about 1/3 the hashrate they're supposed to, no matter what settings I try, or even if I run them by themselves.
Anybody else see this? And if so, were you able to resolve it? Or do I just have two duds?
Out of curiosity what are you running them on? Have you tried running them on a different host? I'm running them on a Debian Squeeze linux server after compiling the antminer version of cgminer 3.8.5 from their other github repository (not the AntGen one - the one with their modded cgminer source). I have tried it on an edubuntu 12.04 host with the antminer-compiled cgminer too, but I think that had the same problem. I'll try again when I get home tonight. |
|
|
|
|
brush242
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:22:26 PM |
|
I only bought 1 unit to experiment with and it has been running stable for over 24 hours on a Rpi. My stats look like this. Average 2.409gh/s A 83568 R 156 HW 369 WU 33.5 I have adjusted the voltage to .9 volts and the clock is set at 300mhz (0B81). BTC guild stats verify the hash rate. Wish I had a more units What does your command line look like? I've been using: C:\Users\M\Downloads\CTB\Antminerminer\cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334 -u <"Shut up, Flanders."> -p <xxx> --bmsc-options 115200:20 --bmsc-freq 0881 And seeing: cgminer version 3.8.5 - Started: [2014-01-02 22:50:04]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):10.85G (avg):10.33Gh/s | A:105042 R:736 HW:1042 WU:143.0/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 93 LW: 194651 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to stratum.mining.eligius.st diff 8 with stratum as "Shut up Flanders."
Block: 1f2b9d6a... Diff:1.42G Started: [10:58:10] Best share: 178K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
AMU 0: | 2.493G/1.734Gh/s | A:17800 R:104 HW:178 WU: 24.0/m
AMU 1: | 1.761G/1.732Gh/s | A:17268 R:104 HW:186 WU: 24.0/m
AMU 2: | 2.706G/1.743Gh/s | A:17764 R: 60 HW:179 WU: 24.1/m
AMU 3: | 2.712G/1.713Gh/s | A:17224 R:208 HW:156 WU: 23.7/m
AMU 4: | 2.151G/1.722Gh/s | A:17680 R:132 HW:169 WU: 23.8/m
AMU 5: | 2.165G/1.713Gh/s | A:17308 R:128 HW:174 WU: 23.7/m I'd like to get that average a bit higher, anyone have any thoughts? I think they are maxed for now. I do have a bunch of those weeny lil heatsinks, I'll put one on each of the ASICs, are there any other chips/items that would benefit from one stuck on there? Also, since I don't want to fiddle with the miner jest yet, what do these commands do: "[P]ool management [ S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit"? I have a lil' bit of CMD.exe experience, but not a lot. I assume the miner window has to be primary, and I know what [Q] does, but what do the others do? |
Support sidehack miner development. Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr |
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8057
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:28:25 PM |
|
use 0981 for the freq not 0881
you will boost to 1.97- 2.01
|
|
|
|
|
fasmax
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:29:06 PM |
|
once the software catches up to these sticks they are going to kill. I am getting a steady 2.0 from each one.
These have to be asic miners new block erupters.
they are the exact same size as a block eruptor .
they have the same id as a block erupter.
fried cat = sushi
first sale of 4000 at 45 btc a case
second sale of 20000 at 33 btc a case
new years eve promo at 31 btc a case
made in china
a shit load of commonalities
these sticks rock.
6x the hash at less power and stable.
they will bury the bit fury sticks.. 2 gh at .075btc vs 2.5gh at .25btc not much to think about.
I only bought 1 unit to experiment with and it has been running stable for over 24 hours on a Rpi. My stats look like this. Average 2.409gh/s A 83568 R 156 HW 369 WU 33.5 I have adjusted the voltage to .9 volts and the clock is set at 300mhz (0B81). BTC guild stats verify the hash rate. Wish I had a more units I know how to up the freq but how did you boost power? I have a lot of 12 volt and 13 volt psu's to use on hubs. I was very pleased to get the 1.98-2.01 gh a stick. but getting 2.4 a stick does sound tempting Increasing the voltage involves changing surface mount resistors at R1 and R2. All the information necessary is in the Over clocking section of AntMiner-U1 user guide. When I get more time I will try some other voltage & clock experiment's. Right now I am happy with .9 volt and 300mhz for 2.4gh/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
kfactor
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:32:01 PM |
|
@ philipma What kind of amperage do you have available for your hubs and how many sticks per hub? I am running 0881 and had to pull one stick out of each hub leaving 6 sticks per 4 amp hub -- the PSU's were cooking with 7 sticks (wallwarts)  |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8057
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:34:14 PM |
|
once the software catches up to these sticks they are going to kill. I am getting a steady 2.0 from each one.
These have to be asic miners new block erupters.
they are the exact same size as a block eruptor .
they have the same id as a block erupter.
fried cat = sushi
first sale of 4000 at 45 btc a case
second sale of 20000 at 33 btc a case
new years eve promo at 31 btc a case
made in china
a shit load of commonalities
these sticks rock.
6x the hash at less power and stable.
they will bury the bit fury sticks.. 2 gh at .075btc vs 2.5gh at .25btc not much to think about.
I only bought 1 unit to experiment with and it has been running stable for over 24 hours on a Rpi. My stats look like this. Average 2.409gh/s A 83568 R 156 HW 369 WU 33.5 I have adjusted the voltage to .9 volts and the clock is set at 300mhz (0B81). BTC guild stats verify the hash rate. Wish I had a more units I know how to up the freq but how did you boost power? I have a lot of 12 volt and 13 volt psu's to use on hubs. I was very pleased to get the 1.98-2.01 gh a stick. but getting 2.4 a stick does sound tempting Increasing the voltage involves changing surface mount resistors at R1 and R2. All the information necessary is in the Over clocking section of AntMiner-U1 user guide. When I get more time I will try some other voltage & clock experiment's. Right now I am happy with .9 volt and 300mhz for 2.4gh/s. yeah my eyes suck so that is not happening. I read that 0981 would work for a 2.0gh overclock. do you think the famous pencil mod used on redfury sticks would work? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
fasmax
|
|
January 03, 2014, 04:44:26 PM |
|
Don't try pencil trick. Nothing wrong with ~2gh/s
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8057
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 03, 2014, 05:03:47 PM |
|
Don't try pencil trick. Nothing wrong with ~2gh/s
yeah can't complain. |
|
|
|
twib2
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
|
|
January 03, 2014, 05:12:14 PM |
|
Increasing the voltage involves changing surface mount resistors at R1 and R2.
All the information necessary is in the Over clocking section of AntMiner-U1 user guide.
When I get more time I will try some other voltage & clock experiment's.
Right now I am happy with .9 volt and 300mhz for 2.4gh/s.
yeah my eyes suck so that is not happening. I read that 0981 would work for a 2.0gh overclock. do you think the famous pencil mod used on redfury sticks would work? *Maybe* but you'd want to measure the resistance really well beforehand since it'll be the only path for current across those two points, as opposed to parrallel around an existing connection between two points (like in the Red/Blue Fury). I've done it with my Red Furys, and it worked great - one is quite happy at 3ghs and the other at 2.8ghs, but I'm not sure that I'd try it with these Ant U1s... Edit to add reference that might help (looks like the resistance could be too high...: http://tedprints.tedankara.k12.tr/23/1/2009-Gozde%20Nur.pdf |
|
|
|
acheekymonkeyuk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2014, 05:19:49 PM |
|
I have no idea what im doing with CGminer and I have always used bitminter.
I am trying to setup on my 10 port hub 7 miners and cant work out what im doing. I need a really basic walkthrough.
I find command line too difficult
|
|
|
|
|
eroxors
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Think. Positive. Thoughts.
|
|
January 03, 2014, 05:33:41 PM |
|
How much power is this pulling from the port at default voltage?
|
|
|
|
acheekymonkeyuk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2014, 05:56:43 PM
Last edit: January 03, 2014, 06:34:30 PM by acheekymonkeyuk |
|
Its and Anker 10 port 3.0 hub so plently power, cant get one running on its own. I normally use a GUI based miner so am really struggling with things like cgminer
I have written my bat file ok etc, but when i plug them into the port only 1 of them is actually working, anyone got any ideas
|
|
|
|
|
|
