★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[pastet89]

WTB DGB for 1 BTC @ 30 satoshi.
Liquidity is so low on exchanges that if I buy there on that price it will go up, also if someone wants to sell that amount, it will go down.
So, for that bulk order, good for you, good for me.
If interested PM, please.

[biboun]

I offer 450$ for 2.6mill DGB's if anyone interested ill send a paypal with a verified account payment, after received the Digi's, escrow from Dev's accepted!
**i'll pay the taxes from the escrow.**

if I calculate well (took 1BTC/600$), it make 28 satoshi/DGC, I know it has gone down, but not so much

[cryptonewbie]

Stop selling to people for pennies on the dollar.  The super-low price on Mintpal is 50 right now...why would you sell for 30?

DGB is going to rebound back to over 100 shortly.

[martins]

Stop selling to people for pennies on the dollar.  The super-low price on Mintpal is 50 right now...why would you sell for 30?

DGB is going to rebound back to over 100 shortly.

i can say that you lose almost 20% for trading your coin and receving USD in any exchange right now, paypal it's the bad one of all.

[HollowStorm]

how do we apply this?
changing subsidy func to "lambda height: import('digibyte_subsidy').GetBlockBaseValue(height)"
and adding  digibyte_GetBlockBaseValue.cpp in p2pool/p2pool ?

Don't think we need to change anything, got 0.02% of orphaned with the current setup.

How did you get  0.02% ?

Please explain.

How ?

I'm talking about my orphaned shares, not DOA. Out of 2400 shares, 50 are orphaned on my side.

I have checked your pool recent blocks

https://github.com/chaeplin/SUBSIDY_FUNC/blob/master/digibyte-subsidy-python/recent_blocks.md

So many orphaned blocks. 0.02% ?

Just one sample.
http://p2-pool.eu:9022/static/share.html#58d8657a9020fe5d3a56afb9b1f28cc4e4df9174a3c68ec1f62e85302bc9fc4a

Value: 8000 DGB

he's got a total of 460 Dead shares!? :O

cant imagine the orphans

[DigiByte]

how do we apply this?
changing subsidy func to "lambda height: import('digibyte_subsidy').GetBlockBaseValue(height)"
and adding  digibyte_GetBlockBaseValue.cpp in p2pool/p2pool ?

Don't think we need to change anything, got 0.02% of orphaned with the current setup.

How did you get  0.02% ?

Please explain.

How ?

I'm talking about my orphaned shares, not DOA. Out of 2400 shares, 50 are orphaned on my side.

I have checked your pool recent blocks

https://github.com/chaeplin/SUBSIDY_FUNC/blob/master/digibyte-subsidy-python/recent_blocks.md

So many orphaned blocks. 0.02% ?

Just one sample.
http://p2-pool.eu:9022/static/share.html#58d8657a9020fe5d3a56afb9b1f28cc4e4df9174a3c68ec1f62e85302bc9fc4a

Value: 8000 DGB

he's got a total of 460 Dead shares!? :O

cant imagine the orphans

This info appears to be coming from the old chain. Did you update to DigiShield?

[DigiByte]

Some people have expressed an opinion that the difficulty is changing to much or too fast. That is what it is supposed to do when the net hash changes up or down.

The difference is no other coin difficulty changes and adapts as quick as DigiShield. It is about as instant as you can get. It is much more accurate at mirroring the actuall hash rate than any other system including Kimoto Gravity Well. Even with the Kimoto Gravity Well Multipools still have the chance to "instamine" for quite a few blocks when they jump on a coin. Then one they leave the KMG can get "Stuck" for awhile at a higher difficulty.

We saw a sudden increase from less than 2 GH to over 8 GH yesterday. DigiShield performed beautifully and the multipools got a very small amount of coins compared to what they are used to getting. Not only that, but we never were "Stuck" at a high difficulty like most other coins would have been with such a dramatic increase in hash.

[DigiByte]

DigiByte has been added to a new exchange! Check out: https://comkort.com/

[DigiByte]

Saw this article about a hostel in London which accepts Bitcoin as well as a few alts:
http://www.coindesk.com/london-hostel-chain-clink-now-accepts-cryptocurrencies/

I sent them a message about accepting Digibyte as well, lets see what they say!

This is awesome! Thank you for messaging them!

[chaeplin]

how do we apply this?
changing subsidy func to "lambda height: import('digibyte_subsidy').GetBlockBaseValue(height)"
and adding  digibyte_GetBlockBaseValue.cpp in p2pool/p2pool ?

Don't think we need to change anything, got 0.02% of orphaned with the current setup.

How did you get  0.02% ?

Please explain.

How ?

I'm talking about my orphaned shares, not DOA. Out of 2400 shares, 50 are orphaned on my side.

I have checked your pool recent blocks

https://github.com/chaeplin/SUBSIDY_FUNC/blob/master/digibyte-subsidy-python/recent_blocks.md

So many orphaned blocks. 0.02% ?

Just one sample.
http://p2-pool.eu:9022/static/share.html#58d8657a9020fe5d3a56afb9b1f28cc4e4df9174a3c68ec1f62e85302bc9fc4a

Value: 8000 DGB

he's got a total of 460 Dead shares!? :O

cant imagine the orphans

This info appears to be coming from the old chain. Did you update to DigiShield?

DigiByte Blockchain Explorers

Crypto Pool Explorer | Alt Explorer


P2P Pools Updated to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield

Mining Inc P2P | Mining-Man Inc P2P | EU P2-Pool P2P | Cloud App P2P | Gr2 Pool  | CA P2P Pool

DGB Mining EU P2P Pool | DGB Mining ME P2P Pool | DGB Mining SG P2P Pool | DGB Mining NA P2P Pool | DGB Mining NY P2P Pool

check https://github.com/chaeplin/SUBSIDY_FUNC/blob/master/digibyte-subsidy-python/orphan.md

from http://p2-pool.eu:9022/recent_blocks

total : 217 block
orphan : 118 block

p2pool list it.



not in block explorer
http://altexplorer.net/block/39172055f38d37fb10eac5cb19a93e56e6c7de32cab5fb28101c399d28c32065

p2pool say, it's orphan
http://pool2me.dgbmining.com:9022/static/share.html#39172055f38d37fb10eac5cb19a93e56e6c7de32cab5fb28101c399d28c32065


update p2pool's subsidy_func.


Here is python subsidy sample.
https://github.com/Sykh/p2pool-cache/blob/master/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py

[ycagel]

For the non miner in mine, can you please explain how this fix allows their to be stability and growth for the currency? Seems like with that fix in place, the vol in price seems to be pretty high. Is that what the team expected?

Kind Regards,
YC

Some people have expressed an opinion that the difficulty is changing to much or too fast. That is what it is supposed to do when the net hash changes up or down.

The difference is no other coin difficulty changes and adapts as quick as DigiShield. It is about as instant as you can get. It is much more accurate at mirroring the actuall hash rate than any other system including Kimoto Gravity Well. Even with the Kimoto Gravity Well Multipools still have the chance to "instamine" for quite a few blocks when they jump on a coin. Then one they leave the KMG can get "Stuck" for awhile at a higher difficulty.

We saw a sudden increase from less than 2 GH to over 8 GH yesterday. DigiShield performed beautifully and the multipools got a very small amount of coins compared to what they are used to getting. Not only that, but we never were "Stuck" at a high difficulty like most other coins would have been with such a dramatic increase in hash.

[ycagel]

Digibyte is ranked 37th on the list in terms of social media presence. We may want to come up with ways to get the word more out:

http://crypt.la/2014/03/01/top-100-digital-currencies-by-social-media-presence/

Thanks,
YC

[iikun]

For the non miner in mine, can you please explain how this fix allows their to be stability and growth for the currency? Seems like with that fix in place, the vol in price seems to be pretty high. Is that what the team expected?

Kind Regards,
YC

Some people have expressed an opinion that the difficulty is changing to much or too fast. That is what it is supposed to do when the net hash changes up or down.

The difference is no other coin difficulty changes and adapts as quick as DigiShield. It is about as instant as you can get. It is much more accurate at mirroring the actuall hash rate than any other system including Kimoto Gravity Well. Even with the Kimoto Gravity Well Multipools still have the chance to "instamine" for quite a few blocks when they jump on a coin. Then one they leave the KMG can get "Stuck" for awhile at a higher difficulty.

We saw a sudden increase from less than 2 GH to over 8 GH yesterday. DigiShield performed beautifully and the multipools got a very small amount of coins compared to what they are used to getting. Not only that, but we never were "Stuck" at a high difficulty like most other coins would have been with such a dramatic increase in hash.

IMG removed to save space

What the DigiShield fix does is allow for sudden spikes in the hash rate to be properly & quickly adjusted for. This prevents pool hopping by large hash farms and multipools, where they will jump onto a coin, mine for a bit at low difficulty & then jump off, leaving the remaining loyal miners at a very high difficulty for a few hours at a reduced reward. Those graphs clearly show that it is working brilliantly btw.

IMHO the price volatility this week was mostly due to speculation on how quickly the price would rise with this fix in place, so to some extent I think yes, that was to be expected. However, with limited market volume it remains possible for someone to attempt manipulation should they be willing to risk a few bitcoins having a go. I'd give it a week or so & I think the Digishield related volatility should quieten down & we'll see much smaller movements. It would also help for one exchange to become slightly more dominant than the others so that it attracts greater volume & then acts as a kind of buffer against attempted manipulation. MintPal seems to be edging towards this position at the moment.

[tyson187]

Could someone explain to me why does Digibyte has an marketcap of 220K but scam coins like Auroracoin has almost 800 million

[ycagel]

Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense. I don't mine, but am invested in DGB for the long term, so figured I would ask. Interesting times.

YC

For the non miner in mine, can you please explain how this fix allows their to be stability and growth for the currency? Seems like with that fix in place, the vol in price seems to be pretty high. Is that what the team expected?

Kind Regards,
YC

Some people have expressed an opinion that the difficulty is changing to much or too fast. That is what it is supposed to do when the net hash changes up or down.

The difference is no other coin difficulty changes and adapts as quick as DigiShield. It is about as instant as you can get. It is much more accurate at mirroring the actuall hash rate than any other system including Kimoto Gravity Well. Even with the Kimoto Gravity Well Multipools still have the chance to "instamine" for quite a few blocks when they jump on a coin. Then one they leave the KMG can get "Stuck" for awhile at a higher difficulty.

We saw a sudden increase from less than 2 GH to over 8 GH yesterday. DigiShield performed beautifully and the multipools got a very small amount of coins compared to what they are used to getting. Not only that, but we never were "Stuck" at a high difficulty like most other coins would have been with such a dramatic increase in hash.

IMG removed to save space

What the DigiShield fix does is allow for sudden spikes in the hash rate to be properly & quickly adjusted for. This prevents pool hopping by large hash farms and multipools, where they will jump onto a coin, mine for a bit at low difficulty & then jump off, leaving the remaining loyal miners at a very high difficulty for a few hours at a reduced reward. Those graphs clearly show that it is working brilliantly btw.

IMHO the price volatility this week was mostly due to speculation on how quickly the price would rise with this fix in place, so to some extent I think yes, that was to be expected. However, with limited market volume it remains possible for someone to attempt manipulation should they be willing to risk a few bitcoins having a go. I'd give it a week or so & I think the Digishield related volatility should quieten down & we'll see much smaller movements. It would also help for one exchange to become slightly more dominant than the others so that it attracts greater volume & then acts as a kind of buffer against attempted manipulation. MintPal seems to be edging towards this position at the moment.

[torchwood-uk]

Need help with a few settings for MPOS, what settings should i use here:

 * Coin Target
 *  Target time for coins to be generated
 *   https://github.com/MPOS/php-mpos/wiki/Config-Setup#wiki-coin-target
 **/
$config['cointarget'] = '150';

 * TX Fees
 *  Fees applied to transactions
 *   https://github.com/MPOS/php-mpos/wiki/Config-Setup#wiki-tx-fees
 **/
$config['txfee_auto'] = 0.1;
$config['txfee_manual'] = 0.1;

 * Block Reward
 *  Block reward configuration details
 *   https://github.com/MPOS/php-mpos/wiki/Config-Setup#wiki-reward-settings
 **/
$config['reward_type'] = 'block';
$config['reward'] = 7990;  must be a setting for this so i don't have to keep changing it?

[grynca]

Someone is investing heavily to DGB, after that there will be pumps. Dont sell your DGB's. Come and mine with us instead at DigiForce.cc
Whales are comming ...

[mintzone]

Someone is investing heavily to DGB, after that there will be pumps. Dont sell your DGB's. Come and mine with us instead at DigiForce.cc
Whales are comming ...

Investors are good! 
Please buy more DGB speculators

[martins]

i would like to give a better offer for 1.5mill DGB's if anyone interested in selling to me, send a PM. I'll pay with a veirfied Paypal account and a verified escroll!

[alphapilot]

Someone is investing heavily to DGB, after that there will be pumps. Dont sell your DGB's. Come and mine with us instead at DigiForce.cc
Whales are comming ...


Investors are good!  
Please buy more DGB speculators

They are not investing, they are pumping up the coin. The wall has now moved to 67sat....