[ANN] FairQuark | FRQ | CPU Mining | 4% Fair Pre-mine | Get in NOW! |

[skaffen]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

[baus]

fuarkcoin?

[Buratino]

Farquaad?

[tabnk]

{
"version" : 80307,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 8991,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 0,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 1706.01179737,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1389837580,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}

[Piesel]

Gimmie some: qNamw9Q3cri3U7tn2rWyLpK6r12RNzDxnM

[Last1212]

WTB 100k for 0.005 BTC. Pm me.

[Piesel]

Wallet no sync.

[Nixxx2]

WTS 5000 for 1 LTC or 0.029 BTC

[epic0024]

Piesel, go to console and type these node in

addnode 95.141.42.163 add
addnode 62.210.177.2 add
addnode 67.7.203.12 add
addnode 172.245.208.234 add
addnode 212.7.200.9 add
addnode 91.211.56.142 add
addnode 125.125.187.191 add
addnode 182.32.195.170 add
addnode 70.54.148.63 add
addnode 113.226.34.214 add
addnode 206.251.42.3 add
addnode 85.230.77.92 add
addnode 174.100.51.46 add

[BulletCoin]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

[jdebunt]

We at CryptoArticles did a small article on FairQuark :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/1/16/fairquark-more-fair-than-quark

Donations are welcome to the CryptoArticles FairQuark Wallet : qKCwg7zkbYJ72cB9QEuvK1eEY6RiwxQHLg

[Bigeyeone]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit and try to sell that as "fair" are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

[Shadow_Runner]

Where is giveaway at least?

[cryptohunter]

We at CryptoArticles did a small article on FairQuark :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/1/16/fairquark-more-fair-than-quark

Donations are welcome to the CryptoArticles FairQuark Wallet : qKCwg7zkbYJ72cB9QEuvK1eEY6RiwxQHLg

Another low baller. Remind me to tell everyone to ignore your shit site for the misinformation scam hole it is.  Fancy not instantly flaming a shit clone using the coins name it cloned and even having a 4% premine with only slightly less instamine. If they didn't want any instamine then they would not have made this instamine version 2.

Your site is a disgrace.

[cryptohunter]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

Retard.

One if they really cared about instamine they would not have made this another instamine only slightly less of one than quark.

They would have thought of their own name not try and scam off of quark

They would have started giving out the HUGE premine.

This is a scam.

[BulletCoin]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.
  

[Shadow_Runner]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.



I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.
  

+100. I was no sleep sometimes and got nothing. Shit coin with "no premine" had many errors or dead pools or whatever. I think smooth launch + giveaway is better than failed lauch with linux only sources or etc. Just IMHO.

Anyway all coins need SUPPORT BY DEVELOPERS. If there is no support - coin will die. Look at dubstepcoin, gift, etc.

[jdebunt]

We at CryptoArticles did a small article on FairQuark :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/1/16/fairquark-more-fair-than-quark

Donations are welcome to the CryptoArticles FairQuark Wallet : qKCwg7zkbYJ72cB9QEuvK1eEY6RiwxQHLg

Another low baller. Remind me to tell everyone to ignore your shit site for the misinformation scam hole it is.  Fancy not instantly flaming a shit clone using the coins name it cloned and even having a 4% premine with only slightly less instamine. If they didn't want any instamine then they would not have made this instamine version 2.

Your site is a disgrace.

Not sure what bit you in the rear this morning, but I don't see anything wrong with my site.

We did an article on FairQuark & we kindly ask for people's comments to be mature, you can disagree all you like with what FairQuark stands for, as WE DO NOT PICK SIDES;

We just report facts and have the client in our possession, as people should be made aware of the fact it's out there.

If you want to flame a coin, run your own site & do so, we at CryptoArticles refrain from such tactics, as it's up to the community to decide to back a coin, it' s not our job nor duty to tell anyone what to do or decide.

I do appreciate your comment and at least you checked out the site, but your opinion is your own & shouldn't be forced on other people.

[cryptohunter]

Please, don't support premined coins!  4% is almost 10million coins!

Fair premine is better than instamine..

not a big fan of quark, but this coin deserverses to fail badly, this coin started out by trying to deceive everybody that Quark had a 98 % pre-mine, which is a total lie, as far a I know Quark was not pre-mined at all, Yes it was mined pretty quickly with block rewards having very fast, so maybe it is reasonable to call it an insta-mine coin.

But I fail to see how an insta-mine is less fair then a pre-mine. At least everybody that wanted to could get in on the six month "insta-mine" of Quark, nobody could get in on the pre-mine of this coin.

People who start a new coin with lies and deceit are basically scam artists and their coin does not deserve to become successful.

Instamine is really unfair for eager miners who happen to live in different timezones or have some other things to do during launch. These people are automatically discriminated. I think premine with transparency is better than instamine because it gives the developers tools to develop the coin without the need for instamine incentives - this way there is no need for shady quick profits right after the launch.

I want to turn around this question: FairQuark was premined privately block-by-block by the developers, would you rather have a coin that had no premine and some big sharks mined against the developers during launch? That could mean that there would not be reserve for the developers to get the coin to exchange and such. I'd rather lose the first blocks to developers than greedy sharks.
  

There is no fair premine here.

For a fair premine - you need a full block explorer, full ledger, Large giveaways and large bounties for things. 50-75% must be used before exchange to stop dumping. This will not happen.

THESE PEOPLE CHANGED THE OP - IT READ WE CAN'T GUARANTEE WE WILL USE THE PREMINE AS WE PROMISE....YOU WILL JUST HAVE TO HOPE WE DO !!!

wtf???  are you noobs so desperate to mine any shit that you will try anything?#

Don't you realise if you REALLY wanted a fair version of QRK you could have mined any other 50 QRK clones that have come out in the last 2 weeks???

YOU DON'T CARE IF IT IS FAIR YOU JUST WANT TO TRY AND PUMP AND DUMP THIS LATEST SHIT.

IT will never reach any Exchange with it's current name. It is a scam.


THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS.  IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%??/

[cryptohunter]

We at CryptoArticles did a small article on FairQuark :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/2014/1/16/fairquark-more-fair-than-quark

Donations are welcome to the CryptoArticles FairQuark Wallet : qKCwg7zkbYJ72cB9QEuvK1eEY6RiwxQHLg

Another low baller. Remind me to tell everyone to ignore your shit site for the misinformation scam hole it is.  Fancy not instantly flaming a shit clone using the coins name it cloned and even having a 4% premine with only slightly less instamine. If they didn't want any instamine then they would not have made this instamine version 2.

Your site is a disgrace.

Not sure what bit you in the rear this morning, but I don't see anything wrong with my site.

We did an article on FairQuark & we kindly ask for people's comments to be mature, you can disagree all you like with what FairQuark stands for, as WE DO NOT PICK SIDES;

We just report facts and have the client in our possession, as people should be made aware of the fact it's out there.

If you want to flame a coin, run your own site & do so, we at CryptoArticles refrain from such tactics, as it's up to the community to decide to back a coin, it' s not our job nor duty to tell anyone what to do or decide.

I do appreciate your comment and at least you checked out the site, but your opinion is your own & shouldn't be forced on other people.

what is the point of your site??? it is just parrots what the fucking scam shitclone devs put

Point out the points above that i have made then i will believe you are not some scam site just begging for donations and passing on misinformation. I see you site mentioned again and i will point to this post with the same remarks. Either you are stupid or have no interest in pointing out the obvious truth.

IT RIPS THE ALGO - IT RIPS THE NAME AND TRIES TO CALL ITSELF FAIR WHEN IT IS AN OBVIOUS SCAM.

THIS IS INSTAMINE YOU DUMB SHITS.  IT WAS NOT ANNOUNCED, IT'S BLOCK REWARDS SCALE ALMOST AS BAD AS QUARKS? WHAT PART OF THIS CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

WHY NOT ANNNOUCE IT AHEAD OF TIME???

WHY NOT CHANGE THE BLOCK REWARDS TO SCALE BETTER SO IT IS NOT INSTAMINE

WHY NOT PREMINE THE USUAL 1-2%??