[ANN] [Metiscoin] [MTS] Unique algorithm | NO PREMINE| NEW POOL! CPU/GPU

[mladen00]

WTS 10MTC for 0.08 BTC

[1714947894]

1714947894

[1714947894]

1714947894

[1714947894]

1714947894

[Vorksholk]

WTS 1000 MTC for 4 BTC. PM me if you're interested.

[ekarol]

WTS 200 MTC for 0,8 BTC. Please PM

[Lugren]

WTS 200 MTC for 0,8 BTC. Please PM

https://www.poloniex.com/exchange

100MTC = 0.1 BTC

[grebec92]

WTS 200 MTC for 0,8 BTC. Please PM

https://www.poloniex.com/exchange

100MTC = 0.1 BTC

U dont understand, he came here from future.

[kannarellone]

WTS 30 MTC for 0.2 BTC
please PM me

[kahir]

how it is based on cpu only ... like gpus can't mine those ??

and how i mine this coin .. by normal cpu pooler miner ?

[gigawatt]

I got very strange problem: (See)

Share found! (Blockheight: 22917)
kHash/s: 1034.78 Shares total: 71
kHash/s: 1034.79 Shares total: 71
kHash/s: 0.36 Shares total: 71
kHash/s: 2.36 Shares total: 71
Share found! (Blockheight: 22917)
kHash/s: 4.34 Shares total: 72
Share found! (Blockheight: 22917)
kHash/s: 6.29 Shares total: 73
kHash/s: 8.27 Shares total: 73
Share found! (Blockheight: 22917)
kHash/s: 10.22 Shares total: 74

Some how the kHash/s goes to lowest (from 1000kHash to 0.5kHash) and then gradually go up to a few hundert. But the share value in ypool doesn't change so I assume it is just a glitch

On the linux build there's an issue with the average hash rate calculation.  Long story short, because it calculates the average hash rate as "total hashes / total time", after a long enough period the value of "total hashes" overflows back to zero.  It's just a graphical bug (you can check your shares/hour on yPool if you're not sure).


I just updated the github to fix it, so rebuild and you should be good to go.

[kahir]

Help please ..


the miner from ypool .. got somekind of virus .. i know its false but my antivirus not letting it ..


can i use normal cpu miner


and what is the port for that site to mine mtc its not in the how to page ..

[con8177]

Help please ..


the miner from ypool .. got somekind of virus .. i know its false but my antivirus not letting it ..


can i use normal cpu miner


and what is the port for that site to mine mtc its not in the how to page ..

NEW PROGRAM FAST++ ypool

cryptsy LIKE exchange

Win32/64bit + Ubuntu 13.04 x64

New
Khash 300 -->>400-500
Shares 1,5x Fast

WIN DOWNLOAD : dropbox
                         mega.co

Instal :vcredist_x64.exe / x32
modify example :  xptMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u username.yourworkername -p password -t thread(->1-32 core) pause
save and 2x click :-)

Mine in LINUX UBUNTU x64

Follow Video

HOW TO CLOUD MINE METISCOIN

miner of metiscoin for ypool.net

HOW TO CLOUD MINE METISCOIN
Sign up for Digital Ocean Virtual Server : REGISTR VPS
for 20 USD good server add 10 USD + 10 FREE Use this code for $10 free credit: DIVEIN10  or ssd2014
REGISTR VPS

[NM92]

WTS 50MTC = 0,7BTC

PM with offer

[b3da]

haswell i5 - 801kHs to 794 max, now...  

[kuperis]

WTS 50MTC = 0,7BTC

PM with offer

in poloniex.com exchange

50 MTC = 0.04515 BTC

[NM92]

WTS 50MTC = 0,7BTC

PM with offer

in poloniex.com exchange

50 MTC = 0.04515 BTC

saw it, waiting for another exchange, this will climb up for sure

[Meizirkki]

Hmm. I'm getting 295Kh/s with all 4 cores of my i7-4750HQ but with only 3 threads enabled it climbs up to 410Kh/s !

Can anybody confirm this behavior on other CPU models?

EDIT: with new miner I'm getting best results with 4 threads. (4 cores) 740Kh/s

[grebec92]

Lowest ask
0.000903 BTC

Highest bid
0.000827 BTC

R u crazy?
Cant even imagine who sell it now.

And: any news about exchanges? There was a giveaway for voting on Cryptsy. I think Dev must add this link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=432278.160) in the 1st post. And create voting on Reddit to place MTC on Coined up.
Dev, where r u?

[DubFX]

I actually sold 200 for 0.04 2 days b4 exchange, thought these prices were just imaginary.

[gigawatt]

I took the time to finally get xptMiner to compile with GCC for Windows.
It was a nightmare for me, but what does that mean for you?  Christmas may have come early.

I've compiled my optimized code for each of the following architectures: generic, core2, corei7, corei7-avx, k8, k8-sse3, and barcelona (k10).

The Windows x64 binaries are available from here:
https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQ
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror)

Use whichever corresponds to your processor architecture.

If you're unsure, here's a quick guide based on your CPU manufacturer and age:
Intel: [Older] core2 -> corei7 -> corei7-avx [Newer]
AMD: [Older] k8 -> k8-sse3 -> barcelona (k10) [Newer]
Worst case scenario, use generic.


I will not be releasing any 32-bit builds.  "High performance 32-bit" is an oxymoron.


Let me know what sort of improvements you see!
Some builds may be slightly slower than the stock jh00 miner.  It all depends on your CPU.

I've added another 5-10% optimization to the code and hopefully fixed the issue with AMD builds.
It seems that mingw-gcc thinks that AMD processors don't support SSE, so it left them disabled.  I've fixed that.

The code optimizations have been pushed to the github repo.
The new binaries have been uploaded. (same URLs)

I've added a few more performance tweaks and pushed the kHash overflow fix to github.
The other performance tweaks I have not pushed because they hard code 64-bit mode for some of the hash algorithms.  For the sake of openness, here's the changes:

keccak.c

Code:

#define SPH_KECCAK_64       1
#define SPH_KECCAK_UNROLL   0
#define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY   0

metis.c

Code:

#define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY   0
#define SPH_64              1

I've also compiled the code through Visual Studio 2010 with performance guided optimization and the windows builds now regularly meet or exceeds the jh00 speeds.
I've built two versions: one with the /favor:INTEL64 flag and one with /favor:AMD64.  Pick whichever matches your processor.
edit: AMD users!  Try the favorAMD build first, then the favorBLEND build.  Apparently /favor:AMD64 prefers older AMD processors (Athlon, Opteron, and Sempron).  See which works best for you!

Download Links:
https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQ
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror)



(My AMD Phenom II x4 955 @ stock clock)

[Benezivas]

WTS 200 MTC, pm me with a reasonable offer in BTC or LTC.

[kakemoms]

I took the time to finally get xptMiner to compile with GCC for Windows.
It was a nightmare for me, but what does that mean for you?  Christmas may have come early.

I've compiled my optimized code for each of the following architectures: generic, core2, corei7, corei7-avx, k8, k8-sse3, and barcelona (k10).

The Windows x64 binaries are available from here:
https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQ
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror)

Use whichever corresponds to your processor architecture.

If you're unsure, here's a quick guide based on your CPU manufacturer and age:
Intel: [Older] core2 -> corei7 -> corei7-avx [Newer]
AMD: [Older] k8 -> k8-sse3 -> barcelona (k10) [Newer]
Worst case scenario, use generic.


I will not be releasing any 32-bit builds.  "High performance 32-bit" is an oxymoron.


Let me know what sort of improvements you see!
Some builds may be slightly slower than the stock jh00 miner.  It all depends on your CPU.

I've added another 5-10% optimization to the code and hopefully fixed the issue with AMD builds.
It seems that mingw-gcc thinks that AMD processors don't support SSE, so it left them disabled.  I've fixed that.

The code optimizations have been pushed to the github repo.
The new binaries have been uploaded. (same URLs)

I've added a few more performance tweaks and pushed the kHash overflow fix to github.
The other performance tweaks I have not pushed because they hard code 64-bit mode for some of the hash algorithms.  For the sake of openness, here's the changes:

keccak.c

Code:

#define SPH_KECCAK_64       1
#define SPH_KECCAK_UNROLL   0
#define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY   0

metis.c

Code:

#define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY   0
#define SPH_64              1

I've also compiled the code through Visual Studio 2010 with performance guided optimization and the windows builds now regularly meet or exceeds the jh00 speeds.
I've built two versions: one with the /favor:INTEL64 flag and one with /favor:AMD64.  Pick whichever matches your processor.
edit: AMD users!  Try the favorAMD build first, then the favorBLEND build.  Apparently /favor:AMD64 prefers older AMD processors (Athlon, Opteron, and Sempron).  See which works best for you!

Download Links:
https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQ
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror)


https://i.imgur.com/0VtFTaB.png
(My AMD Phenom II x4 955 @ stock clock)

Tested favorIntel and it gave me 1100kH/s compared to 1150kH/s for the ypool suggested one.. It was on a i7-4930K.