mladen00
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2124
Merit: 1013
K-ing®
|
|
January 26, 2014, 05:07:09 PM |
|
WTS 10MTC for 0.08 BTC
|
IOTA
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
January 26, 2014, 05:11:24 PM |
|
WTS 1000 MTC for 4 BTC. PM me if you're interested.
|
|
|
|
ekarol
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
January 26, 2014, 05:37:52 PM |
|
WTS 200 MTC for 0,8 BTC. Please PM
|
|
|
|
|
grebec92
|
|
January 26, 2014, 06:45:25 PM |
|
U dont understand, he came here from future.
|
|
|
|
kannarellone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2014, 06:49:44 PM |
|
WTS 30 MTC for 0.2 BTC please PM me
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 26, 2014, 06:54:51 PM |
|
how it is based on cpu only ... like gpus can't mine those ??
and how i mine this coin .. by normal cpu pooler miner ?
|
|
|
|
gigawatt
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:00:20 PM |
|
I got very strange problem: (See) Share found! (Blockheight: 22917) kHash/s: 1034.78 Shares total: 71 kHash/s: 1034.79 Shares total: 71 kHash/s: 0.36 Shares total: 71 kHash/s: 2.36 Shares total: 71 Share found! (Blockheight: 22917) kHash/s: 4.34 Shares total: 72 Share found! (Blockheight: 22917) kHash/s: 6.29 Shares total: 73 kHash/s: 8.27 Shares total: 73 Share found! (Blockheight: 22917) kHash/s: 10.22 Shares total: 74 Some how the kHash/s goes to lowest (from 1000kHash to 0.5kHash) and then gradually go up to a few hundert. But the share value in ypool doesn't change so I assume it is just a glitch On the linux build there's an issue with the average hash rate calculation. Long story short, because it calculates the average hash rate as "total hashes / total time", after a long enough period the value of "total hashes" overflows back to zero. It's just a graphical bug (you can check your shares/hour on yPool if you're not sure). I just updated the github to fix it, so rebuild and you should be good to go.
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:04:55 PM |
|
Help please .. the miner from ypool .. got somekind of virus .. i know its false but my antivirus not letting it .. can i use normal cpu miner and what is the port for that site to mine mtc its not in the how to page ..
|
|
|
|
con8177
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:07:18 PM |
|
Help please .. the miner from ypool .. got somekind of virus .. i know its false but my antivirus not letting it .. can i use normal cpu miner and what is the port for that site to mine mtc its not in the how to page .. NEW PROGRAM FAST++ ypoolcryptsy LIKE exchangeWin32/64bit + Ubuntu 13.04 x64NewKhash 300 -->> 400-500Shares 1,5x FastWIN DOWNLOAD : dropbox mega.coInstal :vcredist_x64.exe / x32 modify example : xptMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u username. yourworkername -p password -t thread(->1-32 core) pause save and 2x click :-) Mine in LINUX UBUNTU x64Follow Video HOW TO CLOUD MINE METISCOIN miner of metiscoin for ypool.net HOW TO CLOUD MINE METISCOIN Sign up for Digital Ocean Virtual Server : REGISTR VPS for 20 USD good server add 10 USD + 10 FREE Use this code for $10 free credit: DIVEIN10 or ssd2014REGISTR VPS
|
|
|
|
NM92
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:24:55 PM |
|
WTS 50MTC = 0,7BTC
PM with offer
|
|
|
|
b3da
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:26:29 PM |
|
haswell i5 - 801kHs to 794 max, now...
|
|
|
|
kuperis
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:28:20 PM |
|
WTS 50MTC = 0,7BTC
PM with offer
in poloniex.com exchange 50 MTC = 0.04515 BTC
|
|
|
|
NM92
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:30:58 PM |
|
WTS 50MTC = 0,7BTC
PM with offer
in poloniex.com exchange 50 MTC = 0.04515 BTC saw it, waiting for another exchange, this will climb up for sure
|
|
|
|
Meizirkki
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:36:48 PM Last edit: January 26, 2014, 07:59:26 PM by Meizirkki |
|
Hmm. I'm getting 295Kh/s with all 4 cores of my i7-4750HQ but with only 3 threads enabled it climbs up to 410Kh/s !
Can anybody confirm this behavior on other CPU models?
EDIT: with new miner I'm getting best results with 4 threads. (4 cores) 740Kh/s
|
|
|
|
grebec92
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:42:43 PM Last edit: January 26, 2014, 08:06:11 PM by grebec92 |
|
Lowest ask 0.000903 BTC Highest bid 0.000827 BTC R u crazy? Cant even imagine who sell it now. And: any news about exchanges? There was a giveaway for voting on Cryptsy. I think Dev must add this link ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=432278.160) in the 1st post. And create voting on Reddit to place MTC on Coined up. Dev, where r u?
|
|
|
|
DubFX
|
|
January 26, 2014, 07:50:11 PM |
|
I actually sold 200 for 0.04 2 days b4 exchange, thought these prices were just imaginary.
|
|
|
|
gigawatt
|
|
January 26, 2014, 08:27:13 PM |
|
I took the time to finally get xptMiner to compile with GCC for Windows. It was a nightmare for me, but what does that mean for you? Christmas may have come early. I've compiled my optimized code for each of the following architectures: generic, core2, corei7, corei7-avx, k8, k8-sse3, and barcelona (k10). The Windows x64 binaries are available from here:https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror) Use whichever corresponds to your processor architecture. If you're unsure, here's a quick guide based on your CPU manufacturer and age: Intel: [Older] core2 -> corei7 -> corei7-avx [Newer] AMD: [Older] k8 -> k8-sse3 -> barcelona (k10) [Newer] Worst case scenario, use generic. I will not be releasing any 32-bit builds. "High performance 32-bit" is an oxymoron. Let me know what sort of improvements you see! Some builds may be slightly slower than the stock jh00 miner. It all depends on your CPU.I've added another 5-10% optimization to the code and hopefully fixed the issue with AMD builds. It seems that mingw-gcc thinks that AMD processors don't support SSE, so it left them disabled. I've fixed that. The code optimizations have been pushed to the github repo. The new binaries have been uploaded. (same URLs) I've added a few more performance tweaks and pushed the kHash overflow fix to github. The other performance tweaks I have not pushed because they hard code 64-bit mode for some of the hash algorithms. For the sake of openness, here's the changes: keccak.c#define SPH_KECCAK_64 1 #define SPH_KECCAK_UNROLL 0 #define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY 0
metis.c#define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY 0 #define SPH_64 1
I've also compiled the code through Visual Studio 2010 with performance guided optimization and the windows builds now regularly meet or exceeds the jh00 speeds. I've built two versions: one with the /favor:INTEL64 flag and one with /favor:AMD64. Pick whichever matches your processor. edit: AMD users! Try the favorAMD build first, then the favorBLEND build. Apparently /favor:AMD64 prefers older AMD processors (Athlon, Opteron, and Sempron). See which works best for you! Download Links:https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror) (My AMD Phenom II x4 955 @ stock clock)
|
|
|
|
Benezivas
|
|
January 26, 2014, 09:20:06 PM |
|
WTS 200 MTC, pm me with a reasonable offer in BTC or LTC.
|
|
|
|
kakemoms
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2014, 09:26:47 PM |
|
I took the time to finally get xptMiner to compile with GCC for Windows. It was a nightmare for me, but what does that mean for you? Christmas may have come early. I've compiled my optimized code for each of the following architectures: generic, core2, corei7, corei7-avx, k8, k8-sse3, and barcelona (k10). The Windows x64 binaries are available from here:https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror) Use whichever corresponds to your processor architecture. If you're unsure, here's a quick guide based on your CPU manufacturer and age: Intel: [Older] core2 -> corei7 -> corei7-avx [Newer] AMD: [Older] k8 -> k8-sse3 -> barcelona (k10) [Newer] Worst case scenario, use generic. I will not be releasing any 32-bit builds. "High performance 32-bit" is an oxymoron. Let me know what sort of improvements you see! Some builds may be slightly slower than the stock jh00 miner. It all depends on your CPU.I've added another 5-10% optimization to the code and hopefully fixed the issue with AMD builds. It seems that mingw-gcc thinks that AMD processors don't support SSE, so it left them disabled. I've fixed that. The code optimizations have been pushed to the github repo. The new binaries have been uploaded. (same URLs) I've added a few more performance tweaks and pushed the kHash overflow fix to github. The other performance tweaks I have not pushed because they hard code 64-bit mode for some of the hash algorithms. For the sake of openness, here's the changes: keccak.c#define SPH_KECCAK_64 1 #define SPH_KECCAK_UNROLL 0 #define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY 0
metis.c#define SPH_KECCAK_NOCOPY 0 #define SPH_64 1
I've also compiled the code through Visual Studio 2010 with performance guided optimization and the windows builds now regularly meet or exceeds the jh00 speeds. I've built two versions: one with the /favor:INTEL64 flag and one with /favor:AMD64. Pick whichever matches your processor. edit: AMD users! Try the favorAMD build first, then the favorBLEND build. Apparently /favor:AMD64 prefers older AMD processors (Athlon, Opteron, and Sempron). See which works best for you! Download Links:https://mega.co.nz/#F!YsZSHYKA!IC8LK_MBGwqC-gWOpO7zoQhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtxvxvkirxax2vj/9P_Rxb9V1y (dropbox mirror) https://i.imgur.com/0VtFTaB.png(My AMD Phenom II x4 955 @ stock clock) Tested favorIntel and it gave me 1100kH/s compared to 1150kH/s for the ypool suggested one.. It was on a i7-4930K.
|
|
|
|
|