_Counselor
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 61
|
|
March 26, 2021, 12:09:19 PM |
|
All four mods are not working in 30 series GPUs waiting for your 5th mod Can you try #5? Does it work? C:\Users\Admin\Desktop\Bitcrack-spmod5>cuBitCrack.exe --keyspace 8000000000000000:ffffffffffffffff 16jY7qLJnxb7CHZyqBP8qca9d51gAjyXQN
Bitcrack sp-mod #5 (https://github.com/sp-hash)
[2021-03-26.15:07:12] [Info] Compression: compressed [2021-03-26.15:07:12] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000 [2021-03-26.15:07:12] [Info] Ending at: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF [2021-03-26.15:07:12] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 [2021-03-26.15:07:12] [Info] Initializing GeForce RTX 3090 [2021-03-26.15:07:12] [Info] Generating 48,617,472 starting points (1854.6MB) [2021-03-26.15:07:20] [Info] 10.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:20] [Info] 20.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:20] [Info] 30.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:20] [Info] 40.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] 50.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] 60.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] 70.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] 80.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] 90.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] 100.0% [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] Done [2021-03-26.15:07:21] [Info] Error: misaligned address Execution time = 9 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
renedx
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 3
|
|
March 26, 2021, 12:42:59 PM |
|
All four mods are not working in 30 series GPUs waiting for your 5th mod Can you try #5? Does it work? Doesn't work. The 30 series problem is code related, not a PTX compile issue.
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 26, 2021, 01:28:19 PM |
|
Doesn't work. The 30 series problem is code related, not a PTX compile issue.
I will receive my first 30 series card in a week or so. Will fix then.
|
|
|
|
renedx
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 3
|
|
March 26, 2021, 02:15:43 PM |
|
Doesn't work. The 30 series problem is code related, not a PTX compile issue.
I will receive my first 30 series card in a week or so. Will fix then. Awesome, would you mind sharing what the fix if you get it fixed? As we noobs been trying for a while Would love to know what've been overlooking.
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 6730
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
March 26, 2021, 02:21:33 PM |
|
Doesn't work. The 30 series problem is code related, not a PTX compile issue.
I will receive my first 30 series card in a week or so. Will fix then. Awesome, would you mind sharing what the fix if you get it fixed? As we noobs been trying for a while Would love to know what've been overlooking. Hang on, I'm zoning in on the error. It appears to be returned from a CUDA API function so that's some good news This issue is also reproducible on RTX 20 cards. I'm currently busy strapping all the API calls with printf's after the error checks are triggered to see which one it is.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
renedx
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 3
|
|
March 26, 2021, 02:32:18 PM |
|
Hang on, I'm zoning in on the error. It appears to be returned from a CUDA API function so that's some good news This issue is also reproducible on RTX 20 cards. I'm currently busy strapping all the API calls with printf's after the error checks are triggered to see which one it is. Cool! Hopefully your printfs do not slow it down too much causing it to work. That was our biggest pain in the ......... I've been checking our discord, but there is really nothing you didn't already know/ran into it.
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 6730
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
March 26, 2021, 03:25:56 PM |
|
Hang on, I'm zoning in on the error. It appears to be returned from a CUDA API function so that's some good news This issue is also reproducible on RTX 20 cards. I'm currently busy strapping all the API calls with printf's after the error checks are triggered to see which one it is. Cool! Hopefully your printfs do not slow it down too much causing it to work. That was our biggest pain in the ......... I've been checking our discord, but there is really nothing you didn't already know/ran into it. I discovered that it's actually the Link Time Optimization (-dlto switch) that nvcc is doing to the object code that's the culprit and messing with CUDA API functions, which is also the reason why linking takes so long, and that this feature is turned off while using the debugging switch -G. Unfortunately there is no switch that turns it off, but it shouldn't be too bad because I can successfully reproduce the bug with -b 1 -t 32 -p 1 (the threads absolutely have to be a multiple of 32 or else the program will complain).
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
renedx
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 3
|
|
March 26, 2021, 04:15:42 PM |
|
I discovered that it's actually the Link Time Optimization (-dlto switch) that nvcc is doing to the object code that's the culprit and messing with CUDA API functions, which is also the reason why linking takes so long, and that this feature is turned off while using the debugging switch -G. Unfortunately there is no switch that turns it off, but it shouldn't be too bad because I can successfully reproduce the bug with -b 1 -t 32 -p 1 (the threads absolutely have to be a multiple of 32 or else the program will complain).
Isn't this the same thing as for Legacy Mode execution? Would at least explain why legacy was running (just horribly slow). Didn't know about this one tho: With a new code target, lto_70, you can get fine-grained control to indicate which target architecture should store the LTO intermediary instead of SASS or PTX. For example, to store Volta LTO and Ampere PTX, you would compile with the following code example:
nvcc -gencode arch=compute_70,code=lto_70 -gencode arch=compute_80,code=compute_80
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 6730
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
March 26, 2021, 04:22:33 PM |
|
I discovered that it's actually the Link Time Optimization (-dlto switch) that nvcc is doing to the object code that's the culprit and messing with CUDA API functions, which is also the reason why linking takes so long, and that this feature is turned off while using the debugging switch -G. Unfortunately there is no switch that turns it off, but it shouldn't be too bad because I can successfully reproduce the bug with -b 1 -t 32 -p 1 (the threads absolutely have to be a multiple of 32 or else the program will complain).
Isn't this the same thing as for Legacy Mode execution? Would at least explain why legacy was running (just horribly slow). Legacy mode is really just no-frills CUDA compilation without fancy optimizations behind your back. The optimizations are what's killing the program this is why it can only be reproduced in PTX and not in source code. Think about it, even a T4 running Bitcrack compiled with compute 5.2 is crashing. It means that something has changed in the way newer GPUs get their code compiled that makes bad PTX. The annoying part is that the offending region of memory is 32-bit aligned (so maybe older cards had no problem with that), and there's unsigned int arrays everywhere. Also today's debugging efforts have come to nothing so I think I'll try arming BSGS/Kangaroo/VanitySearch with Bitcrack-like searches instead.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
March 26, 2021, 06:00:43 PM |
|
The annoying part is that the offending region of memory is 32-bit aligned
Vector instructions need 16byte alignment. In bitcrack sp-mod #5 ~66% of the time is used to multuply numbers. Pretty stupid algorithm. With tensor cores enabled, might push the hashrate abit.
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 6730
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
March 26, 2021, 11:58:26 PM |
|
The annoying part is that the offending region of memory is 32-bit aligned
Vector instructions need 16byte alignment. In bitcrack sp-mod #5 ~66% of the time is used to multuply numbers. Pretty stupid algorithm. With tensor cores enabled, might push the hashrate abit. So dynamically allocating all the blasted local variables should solve it then since those are returned on 256-bit boundaries.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
Markzuberg64
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 2
|
|
March 27, 2021, 06:58:09 AM |
|
I have a program that find the key in 1ms. It is written in sql. Local database. Here is the sourcecode. It is OpenSource: select privatekey from compressed_bitcoinadresses where adress="122AJhKLEfkFBaGAd84pLp1kfE7xK3GdT8"; SP_ LINK IS MISSING to your opensource sql search tool. Cant find in your repositries also.
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
March 29, 2021, 12:20:30 AM |
|
my strategy scan is random slot for scan ( split to small keyspace to search) because I have very small GPU on laptop and I works use for solve puzzle only free time) First time I use batch file call BitCrack it work fine and I try to use C# create small utility make bitcrack lurcher create launcher work better bath file but I have problem with use variable private key is very long I am not programmer I don't understand about byte now I try python call cubitcrack.exe to work , python very easy try to use subprocess function, it is work on windows 10 subprocess it work on windows 10 import subprocess import os #p=subprocess.Popen("notepad",shell=False) #p=subprocess.Popen("kangaroo in.txt",shell=False) p=subprocess.Popen("cubitcrack.exe -i in.txt",shell=False)
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
March 30, 2021, 06:16:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
March 30, 2021, 08:24:47 AM |
|
OK, I would like to search vanity with keyspace. VanitySearch search to full key 256 bit and VanitySearch can not control keyspace search bitCrack can search by options keyspace How can use VanitySearch for search Vanity by limited keyspace search?
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 6730
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
March 30, 2021, 08:35:56 AM |
|
OK, I would like to search vanity with keyspace. VanitySearch search to full key 256 bit and VanitySearch can not control keyspace search bitCrack can search by options keyspace
How can use VanitySearch for search Vanity by limited keyspace search?
Why would you want to do that? By reducing the keyspace, you are making it harder for it to find a vanity address since there are now less possible addresses that are in that keyspace.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
zahid888
Member
Offline
Activity: 260
Merit: 19
the right steps towerds the goal
|
|
March 30, 2021, 09:14:00 AM |
|
Doesn't work. The 30 series problem is code related, not a PTX compile issue.
I will receive my first 30 series card in a week or so. Will fix then. Bitcrack sp-mod #5 ( https://github.com/sp-hash) [2021-03-30.14:27:51] [Info] Compression: compressed [2021-03-30.14:27:51] [Info] Starting at: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000800000000AE55034 [2021-03-30.14:27:51] [Info] Ending at: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF [2021-03-30.14:27:51] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000 [2021-03-30.14:27:51] [Info] Initializing GeForce RTX 3060 Ti [2021-03-30.14:27:54] [Info] Generating 33,554,432 starting points (1280.0MB) [2021-03-30.14:27:58] [Info] 10.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:58] [Info] 20.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:58] [Info] 30.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:58] [Info] 40.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] 50.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] 60.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] 70.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] 80.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] 90.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] 100.0% [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] Done [2021-03-30.14:27:59] [Info] Error: misaligned address Execution time = 8 seconds Same ProblemCan you make these improvements for ClBitcrack including --random ?
|
1BGvwggxfCaHGykKrVXX7fk8GYaLQpeixA
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
March 30, 2021, 10:44:00 AM |
|
OK, I would like to search vanity with keyspace. VanitySearch search to full key 256 bit and VanitySearch can not control keyspace search bitCrack can search by options keyspace
How can use VanitySearch for search Vanity by limited keyspace search?
Why would you want to do that? By reducing the keyspace, you are making it harder for it to find a vanity address since there are now less possible addresses that are in that keyspace. Just do some experiment for search puzzle #64
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
March 31, 2021, 01:41:44 AM |
|
OK, I would like to search vanity with keyspace. VanitySearch search to full key 256 bit and VanitySearch can not control keyspace search bitCrack can search by options keyspace
How can use VanitySearch for search Vanity by limited keyspace search?
Why would you want to do that? By reducing the keyspace, you are making it harder for it to find a vanity address since there are now less possible addresses that are in that keyspace. No need Vanity bitCrack anymore because bitCrack are scan every key from 1234...99.100 I want to test by random now I want test VanitySearch that can use option keyspace search Can seed option on VanitySearch use custom keyspace? anybody know please advice
|
|
|
|
|