[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[Prima Primat]

Thanks for a reply.
But what I was wondering is how the pool calculates pool difficulty for a particular worker.
Which will be more optimal and preferable from server side, having all rigs under one login or split them individually.

VARDIFF makes no difference to your profits. Small rig or large rig. Doesn't matter. It's been explained on this forum and every other pool forum. You can read up on it.

It doesn't matter, AS LONG AS THE REJECTS ARE CLOSE TO ZERO.

No. It doesn't matter. Ever. Period.

+1

I think it does. Otherwise tuning vardiff would not exist.
On wemineltc I am receiving various difficulties ranging from 64 to 600 depending on the particular rig's hashing power.
Taking into account that there is only one server in US and reject ratio is high due to latency I suspect that that it matters even more.
Currently i see across all rigs that difficulty is set to 512. Might be hard coded value.

Since clevermining is still in development I wonder what is Terk's opinion.

Should we use separate btc addresses for each mining rig?!
Is he working on sub-workers. Like for example "btcaddress_worker1"?!
Or should we just use one address for all of them?!

What is Terk's preference on this?

Sure vardiff matters, the guy just doesn't understand.

You're the one who doesn't understand. I'm tired of explaining it, it has been done about a billion times before, just use the search function.
The only way vardiff affects your profits is that it increases the CPU load on the server, therefore increases the costs for the pool operator, therefore makes a higher fee necessary and thus slightly reduces your payouts in the end.

[1715496235]

1715496235

[Starscream]

Thanks for a reply.
But what I was wondering is how the pool calculates pool difficulty for a particular worker.
Which will be more optimal and preferable from server side, having all rigs under one login or split them individually.

VARDIFF makes no difference to your profits. Small rig or large rig. Doesn't matter. It's been explained on this forum and every other pool forum. You can read up on it.

It doesn't matter, AS LONG AS THE REJECTS ARE CLOSE TO ZERO.

No. It doesn't matter. Ever. Period.

+1

I think it does. Otherwise tuning vardiff would not exist.
On wemineltc I am receiving various difficulties ranging from 64 to 600 depending on the particular rig's hashing power.
Taking into account that there is only one server in US and reject ratio is high due to latency I suspect that that it matters even more.
Currently i see across all rigs that difficulty is set to 512. Might be hard coded value.

Since clevermining is still in development I wonder what is Terk's opinion.

Should we use separate btc addresses for each mining rig?!
Is he working on sub-workers. Like for example "btcaddress_worker1"?!
Or should we just use one address for all of them?!

What is Terk's preference on this?

Sure vardiff matters, the guy just doesn't understand.

You're the one who doesn't understand. I'm tired of explaining it, it has been done about a billion times before, just use the search function.
The only way vardiff affects your profits is that it increases the CPU load on the server, therefore increases the costs for the pool operator, therefore makes a higher fee necessary and thus slightly reduces your payouts in the end.

Let them think it matters. Ignorance is bliss.

[igoork]

Still no EU server?

What is going on ?   

[element515]

Pretty weak profitability today, is there a certain reason for that? (Wafflepool is doing better, so it can't just be market fluctuations.)

It's fluctuations. Whatever we decided to mine is making less than what waffle is mining. What I want to know if what has hashcows been mining lately to have such a big jump in profitability. http://poolpicker.eu/

I'm sure we'll even out again soon though.

[grippy54]

My rejects on Clever are >20%, but I'm at 2.4% at Waffle... Sorry, I can't switch until there is a better explanation than "we're mining fast coins." I have a hard time believing Clever is doing anything so substantially different than other profit-switching pools that it causes rejects like this.

[inedenimadam]

rejects be damned, EU servers be damned, people who cant enter their BTC address be damned.  

I am ready for Terk to get back to investing his time into algorithm and profitably work.

[gpuminer]

Anyone know if the "accepted hash" shown on /users/ is correct figure and is what the server got based on share send ?

[jedimstr]

My rejects on Clever are >20%, but I'm at 2.4% at Waffle... Sorry, I can't switch until there is a better explanation than "we're mining fast coins." I have a hard time believing Clever is doing anything so substantially different than other profit-switching pools that it causes rejects like this.

The fact that you have 2.4% rejects on Waffle shows you have a problem on your end. The 20% rejects on Clever you are seeing is just amplifying your personal miner issues. 

Realistically you should be seeing less than 0.8% rejects on Waffle with their conservative coins and regional servers.  How about fixing your miner first and then try again.

[tek428]

rejects be damned, EU servers be damned, people who cant enter their BTC address be damned.  

I am ready for Terk to get back to investing his time into algorithm and profitably work.

You sir, deserve a beer.

[byt411]

Clarification post for people that don't read the thread.

Why are my rejects rate so high?
The high rejects is because we mine very quick coins, and we switch very quickly. You can check the pool-wide reject rate on your stats page. Compare it to your CGWatcher reject rate, not the one on the site.

When will EU, Asia and the 2nd US server be up?
Once Terk has fixed all backend problems and fought the DDoS attacks we are having. The only ETA is soon.

What is the pool fee?
2% for now.

Why haven't I gotten a payout after a week?
Check that you are using your BTC address as username, and not one like "byt411.miner". Your username should be your BTC address only, nothing else.
If you find out that you used the wrong one, PM Terk and he will fix it once he has time.

Why is there such a high "Unexchanged" balance?
This is because some coins are traded manually.

[Kifissia]

rejects be damned, EU servers be damned, people who cant enter their BTC address be damned.  

I am ready for Terk to get back to investing his time into algorithm and profitably work.

The other stuff yeah, but why EU servers be damnes? Us in EU dont deserve a low latency server?

[Dishes]

rejects be damned, EU servers be damned, people who cant enter their BTC address be damned.  

I am ready for Terk to get back to investing his time into algorithm and profitably work.

The other stuff yeah, but why EU servers be damnes? Us in EU dont deserve a low latency server?

He/She is tired of people asking about it. When it is ready, I'm sure we will be informed.

[Terk]

Pretty weak profitability today, is there a certain reason for that? (Wafflepool is doing better, so it can't just be market fluctuations.)

Just a worse day on the market. If you really want to compare us to Waffle:

2 Mar: W: 0.00954890, CM: 0.008646 (-10%)
1 Mar: W: 0.00753175, CM: 0.011097 (+47%)
28 Feb: W: 0.00850992, CM: 0.012437 (+46%)

[Terk]

I'm already beta-testing multi-region architecture and data synchronisation on dev servers. I will be finally launching new servers either tonight or tomorrow morning.

[williamj2543]

I'm already beta-testing multi-region architecture and data synchronisation on dev servers. I will be finally launching new servers either tonight or tomorrow morning.

Thanks!

[mechx]

Can you increase the frequency of updating the last hour hashrate? Especially when  machine reconnect after couple of hours the stats don't show up for a long time.

[cloudrck]

Pretty weak profitability today, is there a certain reason for that? (Wafflepool is doing better, so it can't just be market fluctuations.)

Your statement would only make sense if CleverMining mined the same exact coins at the same exact time as Wafflepool.

[iarsenaux]

the payout is horrible

[ryancpwalsh]

Hey Terk - can you confirm if your custom stratum software follows the standards (meaning scan-time, expiry and queue settings local to our miners are meaningless), or if we specify settings that they are in fact not ignored?

[kjwill555]

Need some help!

I've been mining DOGE for a while but I want to switch to this pool. However, I'm having trouble getting it to work. When I start up cgminer in BAMT, it says "waiting for work to be available from pools" for a few seconds then terminates. Any idea on what I may have done wrong? All I had to change in my config file was the pool right?