[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[pjv]

Yes i can do

one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850  doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing  393/392/391/393 Kh/s

I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....



.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth

Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.

http://k-dev.net/cgminer/

--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.

If not aware, the most interesting development in cgminer forks for scrypt is happening HERE. With discussion HERE.

[1715568071]

1715568071

[Planethill]

--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.

Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did.

Yeah.  Should stick to common conventions to avoid confusion.

[SirGeekalot]

did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about

over 20% of my total payout?   

Code:

You Received

0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)

Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC

Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC

[zneww]

did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about

over 20% of my total payout?   

Code:

You Received

0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)

Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC

Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC

ahaha, well theres your awesome fee for ya

[byt411]

Little disappointed that we fell below 0.01/MH ... Waffle stayed a lot closer to 0.01.  But I have faith in Terk!

Well, even DOGE, MINT and LEAF are at 115% LTC....
It should be better once all backend stuff is sorted out

did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about

over 20% of my total payout?   

Code:

You Received

0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)

Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC

Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC

ahaha, well theres your awesome fee for ya

Give us full transaction hash or your address...

[Terk]

did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about

over 20% of my total payout?   

Code:

You Received

0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)

Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC

Hash
46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947...
Sent Time
2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm)
Confirmations
4 Confirmations
Double Spend
No Double Spend Detected
Transaction Fee
0.0035 BTC

It's this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947b5b9b8493f02a01110e5f308f65d05b6a8c2122

There were 1000 users paid in a single transaction with a total payout of 18.98095953 BTC and a total fee 0.0035 BTC (for sending payout to 1000 users). This was not a fee for sending to you alone, it was for sending to 1000 users. 0.0035 / 18.98095953 = 0.018%.

Besides, the pool is covering payout fees from its own operational fees, so this is not being subtracted from your earnings.

[Starscream]

I hope EU servers are gonna go up soon. Really enjoyed the pool so far, but past 2 days I've been getting 8-20% reject rates again, so I had to move onto another pool.

[nowaltcoin]

Yes i can do

one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850  doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing  393/392/391/393 Kh/s

I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....



.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth

Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.

http://k-dev.net/cgminer/

--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.

Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did.

You are right and it's even brighter if you think about that any Version greater than 3.7.2 does not support GPU-mining any longer
from this point of view it is a new version of cgminer.
But do not fight shadows.

http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/xintensity/
http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpu

Just for those to want more juice out of their cards.............

some inspiration: http://www.cgminer-config.com/index.php

Have a  nice evening

[SirGeekalot]

It's this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947b5b9b8493f02a01110e5f308f65d05b6a8c2122

There were 1000 users paid in a single transaction with a total payout of 18.98095953 BTC and a total fee 0.0035 BTC (for sending payout to 1000 users). This was not a fee for sending to you alone, it was for sending to 1000 users. 0.0035 / 18.98095953 = 0.018%.

Besides, the pool is covering payout fees from its own operational fees, so this is not being subtracted from your earnings.

Ah, thanks terk. Thought something was missing with my calculations. Been a long week.

[nowaltcoin]

Maybee those people with high reject rate try this for me 

queue=0  (1)
scan-time=1   (60)
and expiry=1 (120)

and have a look to the new reject rate

some feedback would be nice 

[RLutz]

I'm currently running queue:1, expiry: 30, and scan-time: 30

Are these okay settings, or should I change something to reduce reject rate?

[dreamreamer]

Is there  a worksize to set? I dont have one set. Im getting a large number of rejects using the same settings that another pool/coin give no rejects. Heres my settings for 2 7970's giving 1.1Mh/s. Anything to change?

cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333 -u 1DJoPhTG5iS9dLZCXiYbdd1Kw8UYJrVjZe -p anything --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -I 13 --gpu-fan 85 --temp-overheat 84 --temp-cutoff 85 --gpu-engine 1020 --gpu-memclock 1450

[Axco]

Mine is same as yours except I have -w256 in mine where as I do not see that in yours.

Try it and keep us updated.

Hope it helps.

[nowaltcoin]

Hi

if you use this this way : just one command i think cgminer will use for all other not mentioned parameters the defaults or detected
optimal parameter

So just create a cgminer.conf and play with scan-time expiry  and queue

[williamj2543]

The reject rate is confirmed fixed for me. I live in eastern america, in Toronto, Canada (near New York). I get 1-3% rejects, which is actually better than most non-profit switching pool. Nice work terk!

[joshua3m]

Overall it's nice to see that reject are lower but with KGW implemented  in most of new coins profit's will go down even more...

In addition to this is looking like with more people on boat profits are lower then in beta testings... 

[dreamreamer]

Setting to  -w 256 fixed my reject problem. I am getting almost no rejects at all.

[ryancpwalsh]

Setting to  -w 256 fixed my reject problem. I am getting almost no rejects at all.

I thought worksize was forced by the server to 512 in this case?

[Axco]

That's great news.

If you are getting less rejects than the ave pool reject rate in your user dashboard that is good news.

[Ninetoe]

why are people talking about worksize and difficulty ?

-w command in cgminer has nothing to do with the static difficulty.