Porte
|
|
February 18, 2014, 10:38:35 AM |
|
Dear Utopianture,
I am the real owner of this:
As you can see I registered on page 65 and that Mr Scam bitrut123 did it one page later!
1295 Porte 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 1 duplicated hash 1319 bitrut123 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 1 duplicated hash
Please its crystal clear the one who post later is the scammer I don't know why I should go through this.
Anyway if you need extra proof check below:
BitCoin 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ 0.01610000 BTC Yes 2014-01-27 14:48:23
Processed TrxID: 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 @ 2014-01-27 14:46:31
You can check I sent 0.0161, so I sent 0.0001 btc extra.
Please delete me from the scammer list and also please reply back to this post once is done, I need confirmations of this
Thanks,
Porte
Please can you reply to this Your name is missing in the stakeholderlist alltogether which should be a mistake. You'll have to proof that this is really your transaction no matter how crystal clear it looks. We've had cases where the legit user used his hash later. Your "proof" is no proof since you only provided the same hash as you did in your original posting. You need to make a new transaction to proof the sender address is yours or provide a screenshot of your client showing the transaction. My name is in the stakeholderlist https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlidWok7hW0DdDZ0amZpM00wQXhrR2lJM3pCOGRhNFE#gid=0And if you read carefully what I wrote I sent 0.0161btc instead of the 0.016, and only the real person who sent it knows how much it was sent and that is me. There is not need to make a new transaction as the proof its the 0.0001btc extra I sent in the first place. Do the frauster know that, of course no, he just copied my hash. Please anyone in authority reply to this and sort this out, thanks Of course he could know that. You do realize the blockchain is public right ? If your original post stated that you sent 0.0161 I would have cleared you but since both posts only state that 0.016 were sent I can't do that. It's only fair that you have to proof the ownership as anyone else does. What if bitrut123 comes and claims the same thing - how could I know who's lying ? I agree that it's unfair that you have to make a transaction if you are the victim here but it's what's necessary to make sure no one that has not paid the fee get's a stake. Like I said, you can also provide a screenshot of your client showing that transaction. If you wan't to clear that with someone from the core team PM utopianfuture but he'll tell you the same thing. Thank you very much patmast3r to show me how to do it, please see below, let me know if its ok or you require anything else http://picpaste.com/pics/16-4JDYa2uQ.1392719720.png
|
|
|
|
skylartomstrom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 10:54:03 AM |
|
Hi there,
I just noticed I got marked with "Duplicated Hash." Could any one of you explain to me what's going on? I'm located on Thread 1, Position No. 1094.
Does it mean someone steal my Hash? Where can I find the Hash Check spreadsheet for Thread 1??
Please get back to me and let me know asap. I did sent the money, so I can certainly prove I'm the sender.
Thanks.
Hi, Yes this means that someone (or you ) has stolen that hash. You can provide proof of your ownership via a new transaction from the same address with a very small amount or by providing a screenshot of your client showing the transaction. Hi pat, I found the thread 1 hash check. It shows that SchlockHolmes and skylartomstrom have same HASH. And it also says I'm the possible owner. Well, I just sent 0.0002 BTC to prove that Im the legit owner from my bitcoin address: 1Jg7stgF3cor9e1CTq8ox5PKMAw3MNcUHN, which as you can see, is linked to transaction id: 55c9245283dea2ff97e4addc01bff0b78b59f629a8839fcc412d8632d6bfc63c. Please remove Duplicate Hash tag from my name. Thanks
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 10:54:22 AM |
|
Dear Utopianture,
I am the real owner of this:
As you can see I registered on page 65 and that Mr Scam bitrut123 did it one page later!
1295 Porte 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 1 duplicated hash 1319 bitrut123 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 1 duplicated hash
Please its crystal clear the one who post later is the scammer I don't know why I should go through this.
Anyway if you need extra proof check below:
BitCoin 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ 0.01610000 BTC Yes 2014-01-27 14:48:23
Processed TrxID: 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 @ 2014-01-27 14:46:31
You can check I sent 0.0161, so I sent 0.0001 btc extra.
Please delete me from the scammer list and also please reply back to this post once is done, I need confirmations of this
Thanks,
Porte
Please can you reply to this Your name is missing in the stakeholderlist alltogether which should be a mistake. You'll have to proof that this is really your transaction no matter how crystal clear it looks. We've had cases where the legit user used his hash later. Your "proof" is no proof since you only provided the same hash as you did in your original posting. You need to make a new transaction to proof the sender address is yours or provide a screenshot of your client showing the transaction. My name is in the stakeholderlist https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlidWok7hW0DdDZ0amZpM00wQXhrR2lJM3pCOGRhNFE#gid=0And if you read carefully what I wrote I sent 0.0161btc instead of the 0.016, and only the real person who sent it knows how much it was sent and that is me. There is not need to make a new transaction as the proof its the 0.0001btc extra I sent in the first place. Do the frauster know that, of course no, he just copied my hash. Please anyone in authority reply to this and sort this out, thanks Of course he could know that. You do realize the blockchain is public right ? If your original post stated that you sent 0.0161 I would have cleared you but since both posts only state that 0.016 were sent I can't do that. It's only fair that you have to proof the ownership as anyone else does. What if bitrut123 comes and claims the same thing - how could I know who's lying ? I agree that it's unfair that you have to make a transaction if you are the victim here but it's what's necessary to make sure no one that has not paid the fee get's a stake. Like I said, you can also provide a screenshot of your client showing that transaction. If you wan't to clear that with someone from the core team PM utopianfuture but he'll tell you the same thing. Thank you very much patmast3r to show me how to do it, please see below, let me know if its ok or you require anything else http://picpaste.com/pics/16-4JDYa2uQ.1392719720.pngSOLVED: Porte is legit. I added a comment in the stakeholderlist.
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 10:56:59 AM |
|
Hi there,
I just noticed I got marked with "Duplicated Hash." Could any one of you explain to me what's going on? I'm located on Thread 1, Position No. 1094.
Does it mean someone steal my Hash? Where can I find the Hash Check spreadsheet for Thread 1??
Please get back to me and let me know asap. I did sent the money, so I can certainly prove I'm the sender.
Thanks.
Hi, Yes this means that someone (or you ) has stolen that hash. You can provide proof of your ownership via a new transaction from the same address with a very small amount or by providing a screenshot of your client showing the transaction. Hi pat, I found the thread 1 hash check. It shows that SchlockHolmes and skylartomstrom have same HASH. And it also says I'm the possible owner. Well, I just sent 0.0002 BTC to prove that Im the legit owner from my bitcoin address: 1Jg7stgF3cor9e1CTq8ox5PKMAw3MNcUHN, which as you can see, is linked to transaction id: 55c9245283dea2ff97e4addc01bff0b78b59f629a8839fcc412d8632d6bfc63c. Please remove Duplicate Hash tag from my name. Thanks SOLVED: Skylar is legit. I added a comment to the stakeholderlist.
|
|
|
|
skylartomstrom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 11:02:20 AM |
|
Hi there,
I just noticed I got marked with "Duplicated Hash." Could any one of you explain to me what's going on? I'm located on Thread 1, Position No. 1094.
Does it mean someone steal my Hash? Where can I find the Hash Check spreadsheet for Thread 1??
Please get back to me and let me know asap. I did sent the money, so I can certainly prove I'm the sender.
Thanks.
Hi, Yes this means that someone (or you ) has stolen that hash. You can provide proof of your ownership via a new transaction from the same address with a very small amount or by providing a screenshot of your client showing the transaction. Hi pat, I found the thread 1 hash check. It shows that SchlockHolmes and skylartomstrom have same HASH. And it also says I'm the possible owner. Well, I just sent 0.0002 BTC to prove that Im the legit owner from my bitcoin address: 1Jg7stgF3cor9e1CTq8ox5PKMAw3MNcUHN, which as you can see, is linked to transaction id: 55c9245283dea2ff97e4addc01bff0b78b59f629a8839fcc412d8632d6bfc63c. Please remove Duplicate Hash tag from my name. Thanks SOLVED: Skylar is legit. I added a comment to the stakeholderlist. Thank you very much! Really appreciate the effort!
|
|
|
|
studyjava
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 11:03:44 AM |
|
Hi utopianfuture,
I checked the google document and found my account is blank without Y. May I know the reason? I checked the transaction ID: 3c490aaf3f3d41b2b04459741211a826b80a3920b17d2b9a4059d7fed7f1f2be which has been transferred to account 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ
Please check it for me.
Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 11:19:09 AM |
|
Hi utopianfuture,
I checked the google document and found my account is blank without Y. May I know the reason? I checked the transaction ID: 3c490aaf3f3d41b2b04459741211a826b80a3920b17d2b9a4059d7fed7f1f2be which has been transferred to account 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ
Please check it for me.
Thank you very much
Plz provide a link to your original post.
|
|
|
|
Sergey_A
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 11:21:19 AM Last edit: February 18, 2014, 11:41:27 AM by Sergey_A |
|
|
|
|
|
studyjava
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 11:33:31 AM |
|
Hi utopianfuture,
I checked the google document and found my account is blank without Y. May I know the reason? I checked the transaction ID: 3c490aaf3f3d41b2b04459741211a826b80a3920b17d2b9a4059d7fed7f1f2be which has been transferred to account 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ
Please check it for me.
Thank you very much
Plz provide a link to your original post. @patmast3r Please see the below link for IPO: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=440185.msg5160372#msg5160372
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 12:06:49 PM |
|
I added a comment to the stakeholder list. if your hash turns out to be unique during auditing you're all set.
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 12:09:21 PM |
|
Hi utopianfuture,
I checked the google document and found my account is blank without Y. May I know the reason? I checked the transaction ID: 3c490aaf3f3d41b2b04459741211a826b80a3920b17d2b9a4059d7fed7f1f2be which has been transferred to account 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ
Please check it for me.
Thank you very much
Plz provide a link to your original post. @patmast3r Please see the below link for IPO: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=440185.msg5160372#msg5160372I've added a comment in the stakeholderlist. If your hash is unique you'll be cleared.
|
|
|
|
parallel38
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 01:38:32 PM |
|
when will this be addressed? thanks. @Utopian: The TX seems legit so please give him a "Y". The timstamps however do not correlate so he should be check for duplicate hash during auditing of thread 2. Why do the time stamps not correlate? I'm in GMT + 1 and forum time is in GMT, so I actually posted 20 mins after the transaction, no? Anyway, I can also upload a screen shot if that would be of any help. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
dx5
|
|
February 18, 2014, 01:41:31 PM |
|
Omg, thank you so much.
The stakeholder’s thread part 2 is locked so I’m going to post the new transaction here:
Transaction id: 717416350018551582
I decided to get NXT since I’m really not trusting sending Bitcoins. Extreme nervousness. So instead of sending .04 Bitcoins, I sent the 400 asked NXT for page 14. It took me an hour and a half, and at one point I thought I lost it, but it all went through.
Thank you.
Transaction id: 717416350018551582
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:52:38 PM |
|
Omg, thank you so much.
The stakeholder’s thread part 2 is locked so I’m going to post the new transaction here:
Transaction id: 717416350018551582
I decided to get NXT since I’m really not trusting sending Bitcoins. Extreme nervousness. So instead of sending .04 Bitcoins, I sent the 400 asked NXT for page 14. It took me an hour and a half, and at one point I thought I lost it, but it all went through.
Thank you.
Transaction id: 717416350018551582
I've added a comment in the stakeholderlist you should be cleared. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:53:52 PM |
|
when will this be addressed? thanks. @Utopian: The TX seems legit so please give him a "Y". The timstamps however do not correlate so he should be check for duplicate hash during auditing of thread 2. Why do the time stamps not correlate? I'm in GMT + 1 and forum time is in GMT, so I actually posted 20 mins after the transaction, no? Anyway, I can also upload a screen shot if that would be of any help. Thanks. It's not necessary. We have to check for a duplicate hash anyway for every user so the timestamp thing was just proforma. You'll be fine and if someone took your hash then it's time for a screenshot . Thanks.
|
|
|
|
hostmaster
|
|
February 18, 2014, 03:38:44 PM |
|
Nice. I do hope you have dev skills to improve the software-to-be by yourself. And that a big part of the money you receive is intended as dev bounties. (is it?)
---
I have a wish. I'd like to get an awesome messaging system. A priority messaging system.
For me free message is optional. (trouble of spam & oversized message flooding the blockchain size) Should have a minimal fee to send your message. Ideally: - minimal fee to send a message (either divided between all in PoS, or destroyed). - AND a minimal fee that is send to the receiver of the message.
Case scenario example: (with x = minimal fee) Alice send a message to Bob: pay x fee & give nothing to Bob => arrive in spam imbox Alice send a message to Bob: pay x fee & give x to Bob => arrive in general imbox Alice send a message to Bob: pay x fee & give 2~1000 x to Bob => arrive in priority imbox, with a level system.
Point: If I urgently need to contact you/someone, I pay 0.20~20$ and I am sure to get a quality answer ASAP. I pay to contact you, I get pay for reading you.
Awesome if - on top of that - you manage to build an alert on regular smtp email. (just informing "you received a message in your NEM general imbox").
Man, you are a genious. I liked so much the concept!
|
|
|
|
calduncan1978
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 06:56:26 PM Last edit: February 18, 2014, 07:30:20 PM by calduncan1978 |
|
Hello,
I'm one of the people whose hash got stolen by fruadster! I'm on #1265 of thread 1. I'm gonna send a small charge in bitcoin (btc 0.0001978) and prove that I'm the owner of the hash id in dispute: c937be2fcf02debbbd6f6a264cda0cde9dc34042366c89911e1757bdb81a3655.
Please wait for me!
|
|
|
|
calduncan1978
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 07:26:04 PM |
|
To whom it may concern:
I would like to prove I'm the owner of the hash code: c937be2fcf02debbbd6f6a264cda0cde9dc34042366c89911e1757bdb81a3655
This hash is currently listed under both Calduncan & Frogster IDs in Hash Check Thread 1 sheet. As you can see, the hash belongs to the address: 1DrmWGphVewMKbxAvgJwWXJFywFak6SMqw
Please be advised that I've sent 0.0001978 BTC with transaction id: e47e80f90be68905dc3c01e5fe73773259eb554c4cca10cf6c2169a083cd2ebe to NEM address: 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ (1978 denotes the year of my birth).
Please verify and clear me of wrongdoing. Thank you for your help!
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
February 18, 2014, 07:34:05 PM |
|
To whom it may concern:
I would like to prove I'm the owner of the hash code: c937be2fcf02debbbd6f6a264cda0cde9dc34042366c89911e1757bdb81a3655
This hash is currently listed under both Calduncan & Frogster IDs in Hash Check Thread 1 sheet. As you can see, the hash belongs to the address: 1DrmWGphVewMKbxAvgJwWXJFywFak6SMqw
Please be advised that I've sent 0.0001978 BTC with transaction id: e47e80f90be68905dc3c01e5fe73773259eb554c4cca10cf6c2169a083cd2ebe to NEM address: 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ (1978 denotes the year of my birth).
Please verify and clear me of wrongdoing. Thank you for your help!
I added a comment to the stakeholder list. You should be alright. Thanks for providing proof.
|
|
|
|
Porte
|
|
February 18, 2014, 07:55:29 PM |
|
Dear Utopianture,
I am the real owner of this:
As you can see I registered on page 65 and that Mr Scam bitrut123 did it one page later!
1295 Porte 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 1 duplicated hash 1319 bitrut123 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 1 duplicated hash
Please its crystal clear the one who post later is the scammer I don't know why I should go through this.
Anyway if you need extra proof check below:
BitCoin 1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ 0.01610000 BTC Yes 2014-01-27 14:48:23
Processed TrxID: 3cfb6f3aa452b56f5f3afdc9c67e2c2c7731b258093f7b691ed9d99f01791198 @ 2014-01-27 14:46:31
You can check I sent 0.0161, so I sent 0.0001 btc extra.
Please delete me from the scammer list and also please reply back to this post once is done, I need confirmations of this
Thanks,
Porte
Please can you reply to this Your name is missing in the stakeholderlist alltogether which should be a mistake. You'll have to proof that this is really your transaction no matter how crystal clear it looks. We've had cases where the legit user used his hash later. Your "proof" is no proof since you only provided the same hash as you did in your original posting. You need to make a new transaction to proof the sender address is yours or provide a screenshot of your client showing the transaction. My name is in the stakeholderlist https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlidWok7hW0DdDZ0amZpM00wQXhrR2lJM3pCOGRhNFE#gid=0And if you read carefully what I wrote I sent 0.0161btc instead of the 0.016, and only the real person who sent it knows how much it was sent and that is me. There is not need to make a new transaction as the proof its the 0.0001btc extra I sent in the first place. Do the frauster know that, of course no, he just copied my hash. Please anyone in authority reply to this and sort this out, thanks Of course he could know that. You do realize the blockchain is public right ? If your original post stated that you sent 0.0161 I would have cleared you but since both posts only state that 0.016 were sent I can't do that. It's only fair that you have to proof the ownership as anyone else does. What if bitrut123 comes and claims the same thing - how could I know who's lying ? I agree that it's unfair that you have to make a transaction if you are the victim here but it's what's necessary to make sure no one that has not paid the fee get's a stake. Like I said, you can also provide a screenshot of your client showing that transaction. If you wan't to clear that with someone from the core team PM utopianfuture but he'll tell you the same thing. Thank you very much patmast3r to show me how to do it, please see below, let me know if its ok or you require anything else http://picpaste.com/pics/16-4JDYa2uQ.1392719720.pngSOLVED: Porte is legit. I added a comment in the stakeholderlist. Many thanks patmast3r , I still can see myself with duplicate hash on the list, When will be update it without it, I thought you did this morning https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlidWok7hW0DdG1XYWlDemNENl9IaGR5ZHNUNTNhcmc&usp=drive_web#gid=0
|
|
|
|
|