[ANN]🌀 Blur Network(BLUR) 🌀 | PoW Cryptonight-Dynamic | CPU/Solo Mining | DPoW

[blurnetwork]

The asic, GPU resistance feature looks great but how much does a person mine on an old system?

I failed to get a single block on AMD FX6300, although h/s is not bad

I do not want to make a pool - I'm talking about some kind of decentralization, although the network capacity is unrealistically high - it's unclear what it supports. either himself on the GPU and ASIC

I do not exclude the possibility that the developer produces coins (supports the network) on the GPU
Too much power of the network, given that the coin was just launched.

============================================

nethash: ~350 kH/s
Prior to this, netnash was 550-600 kH/s
1 ryzen 1700 get - 3 kH/s
I do not think that the developer has 150 hi-end ryzen machines.
Most likely there is somewhere there is a GPU miner

You're incorrect, there.  I don't mine the currency myself, at all, apart from testing purposes.  I simply run the seed nodes with no mining in the background even.  There is a donate option, should you decide to put any of your HR toward my development fund... However, the donate option is disabled by default...

The reason you are finding less blocks can be due to "luck" which is a component of randomness, or the fact that in any blockchain, the easiest to mine blocks are mined first.  As the network progresses, blocks become increasingly difficult to solve, on average.  With a similar hashrate on an i7-7700HQ, I have seen similar results on occasion.  It really does vary a bit.

It can be unlock, but as with most other coins that get launched by an unknown person the launch has been well prepared in advance and hardware has been set up to get an advantage. That is how it usually works and we all know it.

If you join my Discord server (or Telegram), I'm very transparent about being the sole individual behind this project.  I think that your opinion there is a gross generalization, as well as an inaccurate one.  If you believe that decentralized platforms are rigged to that extent, I'm not sure why you participate in supporting any network that would have practices such as those.  I wouldn't.

Isn't it right to say that 99% of "decentralized" platforms are rigged due to some premine, instamine or shady initial distribution?

What you referred to in your first post was a hidden design vulnerability hardcoded into a project.... that’s quite a different thing than a transparent and verifiable pre-mine, altogether. The wall of disinformation and deceit is the point of my contention with your first notion.

[cyberspacemonkey]

Have there been any benchmarks on the kind of performance we should expect on CPUs like for an AMD Ryzen for example?

[DobroFenix]

Have there been any benchmarks on the kind of performance we should expect on CPUs like for an AMD Ryzen for example?

2.5 - 4 kH/s
Depending on the AGESA, memory speed and cores.

[cyberspacemonkey]

Have there been any benchmarks on the kind of performance we should expect on CPUs like for an AMD Ryzen for example?

2.5 - 4 kH/s
Depending on the AGESA, memory speed and cores.

Thanks, I'm going to have to give it a try I have about 5 machines with a Ryzen sitting idle just using them for GPU mining but it's time to put the CPUs to work also.

[kostepanych2]

Can't start daemon in Linux. Get an error:

Code:

/blur-v0.1.6-linux-x86_64$ ./blurd
./blurd: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by ./blurd)

How to fix that?

And Windows daemon not sync:

Code:

2018-07-12 12:57:05.342 [P2P8]  INFO    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:918
[0.0.0.0:0 OUT] [priority]Connect failed to 178.128.186.101:14894
2018-07-12 12:57:12.578 [P2P8]  INFO    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:918
[0.0.0.0:0 OUT] [priority]Connect failed to 178.128.191.245:14894

[blurnetwork]

Can't start daemon in Linux. Get an error:

Code:

/blur-v0.1.6-linux-x86_64$ ./blurd
./blurd: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by ./blurd)

How to fix that?

Well this error is because you’re missing the GLIBC_2.25 version of the libc6-dev package. I’ve seen that error before with those who have tried to run the binaries on Ubuntu 16.04, as it does not support that version of the package. To get around it, I would recommend downloading 17.10 or speaking with one of the other community members who have compiled a version for 16.04... I believe someone posted a link in the Telegram. Because it’s something that has been asked a few times, I’ll incorporate those changes for the next release.

And Windows daemon not sync:

Code:

2018-07-12 12:57:05.342 [P2P8]  INFO    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:918
[0.0.0.0:0 OUT] [priority]Connect failed to 178.128.186.101:14894
2018-07-12 12:57:12.578 [P2P8]  INFO    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:918
[0.0.0.0:0 OUT] [priority]Connect failed to 178.128.191.245:14894

For this error, I’m not sure what is wrong with your daemon. Being honest, it’s more likely your firewall not allowing through connections in private networks. That checkbox needs checked when you get the pop-up from the Firewall on Windows. If that’s not the issue, please join our Discord or Telegram and I can troubleshoot with you.

[Paulc2011]

how long to sync deamon. all i see is ?[0m

sync_info
Height: 1, target: 1 (100%)
Downloading at 0 kB/s
0 peers
0 spans, 0 MB

 and this

try to mine it said deamon too busy
 
states this on wallet
[wallet bL3epw]: status
Refreshed 1/1, synced, daemon RPC v1.19
[wallet bL3epw]: start_mining 8
Error: mining has NOT been started: daemon is busy. Please try again later.
[wallet bL3epw]:

and this on deamon

status
Height: 1/1 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 0 H/s, v1, up to date, 0(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 0d 0h 9m 0s

[crytotronik]

Height: 1/1 (100.0%) on mainnet

Dont know whats wrong, but 1/1 blocks cant be correct. My deamon:

Height: 31941/31941 (100.0%) on mainnet, mining at 1.77 kH/s, net hash 285.42 kH/s, v6, up to date, 2(out)+19(in) connections, uptime 4d 2h 35m 44s

[DobroFenix]

I'm constantly desynchronized.
My wallet falls behind the current block and production ceases.

[blurnetwork]

how long to sync deamon. all i see is ?[0m

sync_info
Height: 1, target: 1 (100%)
Downloading at 0 kB/s
0 peers
0 spans, 0 MB

 and this

try to mine it said deamon too busy
 
states this on wallet
[wallet bL3epw]: status
Refreshed 1/1, synced, daemon RPC v1.19
[wallet bL3epw]: start_mining 8
Error: mining has NOT been started: daemon is busy. Please try again later.
[wallet bL3epw]:

and this on deamon

status
Height: 1/1 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 0 H/s, v1, up to date, 0(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 0d 0h 9m 0s

This error simply means that your wallet isn't synced.  If you are failing to sync, please manually add the `--seed-node` command to the CLI when you `./blurd`.

That should fetch the peerlists for synchronization.

I'm constantly desynchronized.
My wallet falls behind the current block and production ceases.

This issue can be fixed by the exact same procedure. 

[chengyz]

how long to sync deamon. all i see is ?[0m

sync_info
Height: 1, target: 1 (100%)
Downloading at 0 kB/s
0 peers
0 spans, 0 MB

 and this

try to mine it said deamon too busy
 
states this on wallet
[wallet bL3epw]: status
Refreshed 1/1, synced, daemon RPC v1.19
[wallet bL3epw]: start_mining 8
Error: mining has NOT been started: daemon is busy. Please try again later.
[wallet bL3epw]:

and this on deamon .
only linux? not windows? my windows

status
Height: 1/1 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 0 H/s, v1, up to date, 0(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 0d 0h 9m 0s

This error simply means that your wallet isn't synced.  If you are failing to sync, please manually add the `--seed-node` command to the CLI when you `./blurd`.

That should fetch the peerlists for synchronization.

I'm constantly desynchronized.
My wallet falls behind the current block and production ceases.

This issue can be fixed by the exact same procedure. 

my deamon  is height 1,and i do it :blurd.exe --add-exclusive-node 178.128.191.245:14894 --add-exclusive-node 178.128.178.247:14894 --add-exclusive-node 178.128.180.136:14894 --add-exclusive-node 159.65.100.25:14894

but the deamon :status
Height: 1/1 (100.0%) on mainnet, not mining, net hash 0 H/s, v1, up to date, 0(out)+0(in) connections, uptime 0d 0h 3m 28s

[crytotronik]

Nethash is dropping massive. Whats going on? Well...good for me to find more blocks, but I'm afraid to be the "last miner standing" soon.

[DobroFenix]

Nethash is dropping massive. Whats going on? Well...good for me to find more blocks, but I'm afraid to be the "last miner standing" soon.

Arrrrr
Capture the network!
yo ho ho!

[crytotronik]

Nethash is dropping massive. Whats going on? Well...good for me to find more blocks, but I'm afraid to be the "last miner standing" soon.

Arrrrr
Capture the network!
yo ho ho!

Edit:

After I restarted the daemon+wallet, all is backk to normal. And all blocks I found were not accepted.

Nkay... this was to good to be real.

[DobroFenix]

Nethash is dropping massive. Whats going on? Well...good for me to find more blocks, but I'm afraid to be the "last miner standing" soon.

Arrrrr
Capture the network!
yo ho ho!

Edit:

After I restarted the daemon+wallet, all is backk to normal. And all blocks I found were not accepted.

Nkay... this was to good to be real.

I had the same thing.
Because of the out-of-sync, you created a separate branch of the block.
But since your power was less than the power of the network, the blockade rejected your branch.
Use the new version of the wallet - there are more nodes and less probability of out of sync

[mixelalex]

Greetings! Could you tell me when should I wait the wallet update for Windows and IOS?

[DobroFenix]

You created too complicated and not perfect coin. She has too many minuses and all the same ones that were in the NERVA.
Looking at the power of the network now it is powerful to say boldly that the coin is dead.

If it is not so, then persuade me.
But all the above arguments of the developer could not convince me that this is 100% clone NERVACOIN

[Spooknow]

Greetings! Could you tell me when should I wait the wallet update for Windows and IOS?

I do not really understand why it is needed at this stage of development. The team needs to concentrate entirely on the other.

[blurnetwork]

You created too complicated and not perfect coin. She has too many minuses and all the same ones that were in the NERVA.
Looking at the power of the network now it is powerful to say boldly that the coin is dead.

If it is not so, then persuade me.
But all the above arguments of the developer could not convince me that this is 100% clone NERVACOIN

There are quite a few differences from NERVA. Those will grow over time. Very simple solution for you: take your hashpower and time elsewhere.

[blurnetwork]

Greetings! Could you tell me when should I wait the wallet update for Windows and IOS?

An update for the Windows wallet being compiled as I write this. Update for Linux will also  be released this evening. iOS is not an area I’m concerned with currently. However, if you check the Roadmap on the website, you will see that a Progressive Web App wallet is in the works for the next quarter of 2018. That app will resemble the presentation of the Elastos Web Wallet and will be cross-platform.