|
cycoinminer
|
 |
February 24, 2014, 09:12:09 PM |
|
Fucking unfair launch. And what was wrong with ruby.hash.so ? I got shares and no problem according to cgminer, but the pool showed no shares to me.
E: And what is that "50 RBY" per block?
check your port, maybe you mining another coin...got this type with hash.so too Fuck, fuck, fuck. Why there is port 1337 on the front page if the right port is 3415 (in getting started section)? Could have got lot of ruby from hash.so  Port 1337 is able to switch your workers between different coins. I used this, too. But hash.so said I have only 200kh/s while cgminer was stating way over 2MH as always. First time on that pool and I think also the last time... Keep with hash.so - they switched me instantly - didn't show me my true hash power, but I got a shed load of coins. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
atleticofa
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:12:16 PM |
|
Block reward will be 500 at block #500 onwards, confirmed by dev on IRC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
acckiller
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:12:54 PM |
|
i got 6 rubys i will sell for 0.05 btc let me know
|
|
|
|
|
wc-miner
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:13:00 PM |
|
Fucking unfair launch. And what was wrong with ruby.hash.so ? I got shares and no problem according to cgminer, but the pool showed no shares to me.
E: And what is that "50 RBY" per block?
check your port, maybe you mining another coin...got this type with hash.so too Fuck, fuck, fuck. Why there is port 1337 on the front page if the right port is 3415 (in getting started section)? Could have got lot of ruby from hash.so Port 1337 is able to switch your workers between different coins. I used this, too. But hash.so said I have only 200kh/s while cgminer was stating way over 2MH as always. First time on that pool and I think also the last time... Yep, I noticed this but too late. |
|
|
|
|
|
hazryder
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:13:12 PM |
|
This is the first coin launch I've been online for, could someone explain in simple terms why everyone's saying it's a 'scam' and that it's been a terrible failure? All I've seen is that it launched a few minutes later than they said it would.
Thanks!
If you think that is the only thing wrong with this coin you are a lost cause... Bit rude aren't you? I make a post asking for help understanding why this was a bad launch, and you slam me for not understanding why this was a bad launch? Did you even think that through? Well, you must be moronic if the only thing wrong with this coin you can find is that it wasn't launched at the time they said it would be launched. The truth hurts. ... You're clearly not even reading what I'm writing, thanks anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
haggis
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:13:50 PM |
|
Fucking unfair launch. And what was wrong with ruby.hash.so ? I got shares and no problem according to cgminer, but the pool showed no shares to me.
E: And what is that "50 RBY" per block?
check your port, maybe you mining another coin...got this type with hash.so too Fuck, fuck, fuck. Why there is port 1337 on the front page if the right port is 3415 (in getting started section)? Could have got lot of ruby from hash.so Port 1337 is able to switch your workers between different coins. I used this, too. But hash.so said I have only 200kh/s while cgminer was stating way over 2MH as always. First time on that pool and I think also the last time... Keep with hash.so - they switched me instantly - didn't show me my true hash power, but I got a shed load of coins. I got less than 1 ruby... |
|
|
|
|
bmL
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:14:08 PM |
|
Why don't you post an source on github? Postin zipped source instead of version control link is like going back to the 80s...
-999999999 for the devs
|
|
|
|
|
|
FreePls
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:14:32 PM |
|
wow what is the nethashrate right now? the pools seems to be all good filled ( except the last 2 )
|
|
|
|
|
kultus
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:14:40 PM |
|
YAY MY FAVOURITE MINING POOL WILL BE HERE ... TIME TO PARTY !~!!!!~!!!!~!!~!!!~!! |
|
|
|
|
kuusj98
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:15:24 PM |
|
What a fail coin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
hazryder
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:15:38 PM |
|
wow what is the nethashrate right now? the pools seems to be all good filled ( except the last 2 )
6.31 GH/s and rising! |
|
|
|
|
|
oldmarsh
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:15:47 PM |
|
wow what is the nethashrate right now? the pools seems to be all good filled ( except the last 2 )
Over 6 ghs/s apparently. It is a sad day when a shitcoin is able to get so much hashing power. |
|
|
|
|
|
ezvm
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:15:51 PM |
|
-1
I Gave this coin a chance, even with there hugh 2% premine I was hesitant, but with what happened at launch totally changed the game for me. FUCK THIS SCAM COIN I'M OUT 5X -
|
|
|
|
|
Olegcho
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:15:58 PM |
|
The dev just lied in IRC that the delay is because he compiling the wallet - still no wallet!
|
|
|
|
|
|
YourMine.org
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:16:26 PM |
|
Good launch by United-miners, terrible fail launch by bitember. This is why I always sign up to multiple pools  Also the launch wasn't fair at all rofl half the pools still aren't working. I also signed up to dedicated pool which appears to not be up The source was given out to a selective few pool owners in advance. Bitember was not one of them. We're up and running strong now thought. But this was in no way a "fair launch" i can confirm this... Even if our pool coins4everyone.com is up and running now since some minutes; all i can say is that was not fair at ALL. nothing on IRC; then some folks says some pools are hashing then somebody put a link of the source code on dropbox; the zip is not compiling without making a chmod; github still empty... wow that's not a good beginning! it's like this is a big masquerade. 100% Correct Never Again Ever Ever will we put up with this. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bfljosh
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:16:35 PM |
|
Lol, 15 mh and 4 coins. I'm out. Gl ginger breads.
|
|
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:16:51 PM |
|
you do not know the price ... and mining in difficulty 100 - crazy people, crazy crazy people
2% pre miningI'm going to mining something that will make money, not make people rich as developer  |
|
|
|
|
|
add1ct3dd
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:18:21 PM |
|
Good launch by United-miners, terrible fail launch by bitember. This is why I always sign up to multiple pools Also the launch wasn't fair at all rofl half the pools still aren't working. I also signed up to dedicated pool which appears to not be up Thank you, we try our best We have an alternative stratum port up also for anyone having issues! |
|
|
|
|
NoUseForACoin
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
trading in the shadow's shadow
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:18:40 PM |
|
I Think as soon as this hits an exchange I'll dump ALL of my... uhmmm 3.2 RUBIES!
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitRock
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:19:12 PM |
|
The specification of Ruby coin is pretty similar to Megacoin except 2% premine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
