Stringent laws!

[linkHA]

If the law strictly limits ICO, these ICO tokens will not appear on the exchange.
So if the token loses its liquidity, the token is worthless.

[ronics]

most of the strict laws are frightened by the frequency of those who are increasingly investing here because this law leads to a bypassing some sort of turning laws while proving that a transaction is really secure or a secure one to be projects and under such laws. A Crypto is really working, because it gives a freedom to those who want it here with a crypto and freedom of ordinary people. Reaching that power is just like getting their courage to get along and get their wealth.

[dekleni]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

his name is also uu must have the law. but this is a crypto trade so the law is not really effective

[Tone147]

I think it is certain that the development of science and technology requires a relaxed policy environment.
Then the market will judge what a good project is and what a shit project is.

[Wayan_Pedjeng]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

I would favor more stringent regulations. Nowadays too many scammers are entering the ICO sector and they are causing heartburn among the investors as well as the bounty campaign participants.

[3kpk3]

Screw laws. The entire purpose of the cryptocurrency market is the ability to conduct financial transactions online in an anonymous, decentralized manner and laws go against this core concept of crypto itself which is why I would never support stringent laws. I don't support KYC too which is why I advise people to cautiously research the campaigns that ask for KYC details instead of blindly giving away your details.

[heelariyanti]

In my view strict laws are something to be thankful for encryption since it's more secure than contributing, evading extortion, and if everything is stipulated, individuals won't be as insane as they are currently. I think it is likewise something worth being thankful for. Then again, there is a law demonstrating that the national gathering perceives the cryptographic money.

[lance04]

Actually the regulations of the law is to provide more security for the benefit of both parties in same transaction they agreed upon,
through this they can give a equal judgement to promote common good.

[bellamente]

We need strict and correct laws that will regulate the entire crypto industry.

Now I'm seeing chaos in a crypto community that does not have confidence in the future

[kenman]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

obstacle maybe. but it's a huge mechanism now, i doubt anyone can really stop it. progress in it is absolutely natural as it comes along the new era of  the digital world. it can only be controlled in a way

[Hopeman1]

I'm afraid of policy, especially from Japan, Korea and China.
Because every time the policies of these countries come up, then the whole crypto-money market drops dramatically, which is scary.

[funnynews]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

I think that many people would feel more confident in tokens which are already tested and regulated by some law system, but also it can just put a borders along the development of them.

[BlackBoxRecords]

I think that a newby that writes in oversized letters does not need to do so. To the point, the laws are coming so it is not a question of liking or not, they are there period.

[sjbi]

I think anything stringent will not give confidence in any sector. So is crypto market. Stringent law will kill cryptocurrency instead of promoting it. Instead regulations are in need at present due to reports of frauds in the market. Regulations will make cryptocurrency even more strong and stable. So I want regulators to regulate the market.

[Ryananda]

I have never thought about the law, sometimes even if the rules are strict I often do not follow it, the issue of progress on the token depends on dev concern on the price already entered in the market.

[cryptogeek101]

Do you think that stringent laws will give you confidence in tokens or an obstacle to their progress?

Please we need understand what you mean by stringent laws, what regulative purposes are these laws going to serve, because so much stringent laws are not in consonance with a decentralized situation like ours. We need to be wary of laws that will be detrimental to us, instead of creating confidence to us.

[cryptowhiz]

The most stringent laws in the world are useless unless there is the will to enforce them.
I think cryptocurrency will have very severe effect, rather being extremely limiting

[styca]

Strict laws do both - they give confidence, but also present obstacles.
Personally I think that legislation is necessary, and is a vital step on the path towards mainstream adoption. If crypto is to become a part of everyday life, then there have to be sufficient laws in place.

[CryptoDoing]

Not really, because strict laws will entail strict restrictions, and this is not always beneficial .

[leoni_lach]

Yes. Here my answer is clear, because the law is designed to protect the interests of both parties, and therefore the interests of buyers, that is us.