Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2019, 04:09:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 [189] 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 ... 272 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated]  (Read 629452 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Jasun7211
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 517
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:28:14 AM
 #3761

All I kmow is I was in actm when btc was around $13 per btc, so mayne that .05 is actually lookimg pretty good

██████████████████            ██████████
████████████████              ██████████
██████████████          ▄█   ███████████
████████████         ▄████   ███████████
██████████        ▄███████  ████████████
████████        ▄█████████  ████████████
██████        ▄███████████  ████████████
████       ▄██████████████ █████████████
██      ▄███████████████████████████████
▀        ███████████████████████████████
▄          █████████████████████████████
██▄         ▀███████████████████████████
████▄        ▀██████████████████████████
██████▄        ▀████████████████████████
████████▄        ████████████████▀ █████
██████████▄       ▀█████████████  ██████
████████████▄       ██████████   ███████
██████████████▄      ▀██████    ████████
████████████████▄▄     ███     █████████
███████████████████▄    ▀     ██████████
█████████████████████▄       ███████████
███████████████████████▄   ▄████████████





▄█████████████████   ███             ███   ███   ███▄                ▄███            █████            ████████████████   ████████████████▄             █████
███▀                 ███             ███   ███   ████▄              ▄████           ███████           ███                ███           ▀███           ███████
███                  ███             ███   ███   █████▄            ▄█████          ███▀ ▀███          ███                ███            ███          ███▀ ▀███
███                  ███             ███   ███   ███ ███▄        ▄███ ███        ▄███▀   ▀███▄        ███                ███           ▄███        ▄███▀   ▀███▄
███                  ███████████████████   ███   ███  ▀██▄      ▄██▀  ███       ▄███▀     ▀███▄       ████████████████   ████████████████▀        ▄███▀     ▀███▄
███                  ███             ███   ███   ███   ▀███    ███▀   ███      ▄███▀       ▀███▄      ███                ███        ███          ▄███▀       ▀███▄
███                  ███             ███   ███   ███    ▀███  ███▀    ███     ▄███▀         ▀███▄     ███                ███         ███        ▄███▀         ▀███▄
███▄                 ███             ███   ███   ███      ██████      ███    ▄███             ███▄    ███                ███          ███      ▄███             ███▄
▀█████████████████   ███             ███   ███   ███       ████       ███   ▄███               ███▄   ████████████████   ███           ███    ▄███               ███▄

|
|
1576253366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576253366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576253366
Reply with quote  #2

1576253366
Report to moderator
1576253366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576253366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576253366
Reply with quote  #2

1576253366
Report to moderator
1576253366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576253366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576253366
Reply with quote  #2

1576253366
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1576253366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576253366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576253366
Reply with quote  #2

1576253366
Report to moderator
1576253366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1576253366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1576253366
Reply with quote  #2

1576253366
Report to moderator
shrodes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:33:05 AM
 #3762

provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

Only the Whales bought at 0.0025 and they have all sold up long ago and gone. I bet almost no-one left here will find in their BF log that they bought at exactly 0.0025.

So this is a joke.

Pretty sure I bought most of mine at 0.0025, but is there any way of getting BTCT data now?
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 12:41:04 AM
 #3763

Ken had two separate IPOs, one @.0005 and one @.0025.
The people who bought his second IPO are getting 20 cents on the dollar.  Either MSD is not aware of this, or Ken is lying again Smiley

I'd imagine both ipo s would be the same as the first ipo had a much lower BTC/USD price.  Remember you guys need to look at this from the establishment's view.  Business views arn't the state's.  The state just needs to be legaly sufficient!!

If investors purchased shares (not tendered shares from the first IPO) in the second IPO, they will be getting ~$.25 per share, provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

It doesn't matter where the shares were purchased from,

As soon as you tendered them to a whole new "IPO" the "IPO" that they are currently "making you refund' that is named "ActiveMining".

You owe investors (Anyone with shares regardless of where they came from) 0.0025 BTC Per share. Whatever BTC Price was when you opened up the new IPO (July 8th by my records https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252531.msg2685508#msg2685508) is the USD you have to pay + "8% Interest")

http://www.coindesk.com/price/

On July 8th, BTC was at $74.56 by CoinDesks Historical Price so each share would be worth $0.1864

So to put this in perspective, every 10,000 Shares of ActiveMining would get a refund of $1,864 or $2,500 at Ken's ~$0.25.

The MSD says the investors original purchase price, so the second IPO if you tendered shares from the first IPO you will receive the first IPO price of .0005 BTC if you want a refund.
JoTheKhan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:42:49 AM
 #3764

Yeah I can prove I moved shares from BTCT to Bitfunder.. And then from Bitfunder to Cryptotrade
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 12:43:13 AM
 #3765

Pretty sure I bought most of mine at 0.0025, but is there any way of getting BTCT data now?

No, all you can see is the ammount you tendered to BF in your BF log. You can't login to btc-tc anymore.

Ken how do we prove what we paid for them on BTC-TC?

The investor will have to prove what they paid with documents.  Some of the details with MSD have to be ironed out.
iamnot_
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:45:07 AM
 #3766

Ken are you able to mention anything today about the Hashfast situation or future develops for the company? I know there are many who may be interested in keeping their shares despite all this MSD stuff.
sartech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:48:03 AM
 #3767

Ken are you able to mention anything today about the Hashfast situation or future develops for the company? I know there are many who may be interested in keeping their shares despite all this MSD stuff.
+1

kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 12:48:04 AM
 #3768

Ken had two separate IPOs, one @.0005 and one @.0025.
The people who bought his second IPO are getting 20 cents on the dollar.  Either MSD is not aware of this, or Ken is lying again Smiley

I'd imagine both ipo s would be the same as the first ipo had a much lower BTC/USD price.  Remember you guys need to look at this from the establishment's view.  Business views arn't the state's.  The state just needs to be legaly sufficient!!

If investors purchased shares (not tendered shares from the first IPO) in the second IPO, they will be getting ~$.25 per share, provided they purchased them direct from Active Mining.

It doesn't matter where the shares were purchased from,

As soon as you tendered them to a whole new "IPO" the "IPO" that they are currently "making you refund' that is named "ActiveMining".

You owe investors (Anyone with shares regardless of where they came from) 0.0025 BTC Per share. Whatever BTC Price was when you opened up the new IPO (July 8th by my records https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252531.msg2685508#msg2685508) is the USD you have to pay + "8% Interest")

http://www.coindesk.com/price/

On July 8th, BTC was at $74.56 by CoinDesks Historical Price so each share would be worth $0.1864

So to put this in perspective, every 10,000 Shares of ActiveMining would get a refund of $1,864 or $2,500 at Ken's ~$0.25.

The MSD says the investors original purchase price, so the second IPO if you tendered shares from the first IPO you will receive the first IPO price of .0005 BTC if you want a refund.

There's no first or second IPO Ken. AMC wasn't told to repay investors, ActiveMining was. When we Tendered them over that was our "purchase" of ActiveMining at a 1:1 ratio. We purchased ActiveMining with our AMC Shares at ActiveMining's IPO Price. There's no way around this logically and the MSD would agree wholeheartedly.

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price.  It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.
arousedrhino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:49:37 AM
 #3769

Ken are you able to mention anything today about the Hashfast situation or future develops for the company? I know there are many who may be interested in keeping their shares despite all this MSD stuff.
+1
+1 Would like an answer to this as well.
shaofis
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:50:08 AM
 #3770


The MSD says the investors original purchase price, so the second IPO if you tendered shares from the first IPO you will receive the first IPO price of .0005 BTC if you want a refund.

I guess you leave no option but for everyone here to take it up with MSD directly. How do you think you'll fare if that happens?
JoTheKhan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:50:25 AM
 #3771

If you bought on BTCT, they sent you an email everytime you bought at the exact time and date you bought along with the price and the number of shares lol

Not only that. Burnside sent out API Keys that should let you access your records. BTCT.co is still up btw.
Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:52:15 AM
 #3772

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price.  It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 01:02:19 AM
 #3773

OK Ken so you will need to find 10,000,000 x $0.25 which is 2.5Mill USD. A bit less that I thought before - will this bankrupt the company?

No, we did not sell 10,000,000 shares @ $.025, sorry.
pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1005



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:02:31 AM
 #3774

OK Ken so you will need to find 10,000,000 x $0.25 which is 2.5Mill USD. A bit less that I thought before - will this bankrupt the company?

How do you know that?

snowdropfore
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 847
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:02:57 AM
 #3775

i do not understand ,i bought shares at many price, 0.0025,0.005,0.001.00089,0.0005 so what should i refund?? or i can still keep my shares???

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion




   ▄▄▄▄▄          ▄▄██████▄
 ▄█▀▀▀▀▀█▄      ▄███▀▀   ▀██
 ▀       ▀     ██▀
    ▄███▄          ▄█████▄
   ███████ █      █████████
           █
          █     █▄            ▄█
█▄       █      ▀██▄▄      ▄▄██▀
 ███▄▄▄▀▀█▄▄▄███▀ ▀▀██████████
  ██ ██▄ ▀▀▄███▄    ▄▄▄██  ██
   ██ ▀█████▀ ▀██████▀▀▀  ██
    ██                ▄▄  ██
     ██  ▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀▀    ██
      ██    ███
       ██   ███
        ██   ███
Highly Secure
Instant Confirmations
Secure Wallet
      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
bigdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:03:40 AM
 #3776

Ken,

Can you give some information about the future prospects of the business so investors can decide to keep their shares or have them reimbursed.

Assuming all investors shares are reimbursed for those who choose so, what then for the rest of the company?

What are your plans?

What are the prospects?

Clearly this is a complete stuff up, so now is the time to simply be clear and transparent on everything.
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 01:04:04 AM
 #3777

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price.  It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.

You traded one security for another, your basis in the first security is what counts.  You did not purchase the second security you did an exchange.
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 01:04:36 AM
 #3778

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price.  It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.

Why let filthy fiat get between two of Bitcoin's greatest visionaries?  

The MSD.
Jasun7211
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 517
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:08:18 AM
 #3779

You are wrong, the language states the original purchase price.  It is what you paid in USD to acquire the shares, it is what your cost basis is in the shares plus 8%, that is what the Missouri law states and that is what the MSD is going to make us do.

Actually I'm correct, what do you think the original purchase price was when you IPO'd at 0.0025BTC and traded shares for a 1:1 Ratio?

The original purchase was was 0.0025BTC as soon as you took our AMC shares. This is how business works. Instead of taking USD or BTC, you took shares that you valued at 0.0025 BTC Each.

This is exactly how they will see it, there's no funny games here. I have records showing the transaction of AMC Shares for ActiveMining Shares (At ActiveMining's Original IPO) that were valued at 0.0025 BTC on July 8th 2013.

While I agree with you in the business world, in the eyes of the state that isn't how it works.  They need to follow their own statutes.  Really now that btc is defi ed as property actm shares are a deriviative of that property yet still property, but all that is irrlelvant .  The state only cares about the exchange of value as denominated in legal tender.  They don't distinct between btc and actm shares.  Trust me I know how they think.....I work for them.   It is a special way of thinking.....logical....yes,...but in an infantile sort of way.  But these laws are written by simpletons.   This is a classic example of what people talk abiut when they say "by the time the govt figures it out and regulates it, their laws won't apply since the speed of the technology moves so fast"  remember the state just needs to be legally sufficient as interpreted by their laws.....no more no less.

██████████████████            ██████████
████████████████              ██████████
██████████████          ▄█   ███████████
████████████         ▄████   ███████████
██████████        ▄███████  ████████████
████████        ▄█████████  ████████████
██████        ▄███████████  ████████████
████       ▄██████████████ █████████████
██      ▄███████████████████████████████
▀        ███████████████████████████████
▄          █████████████████████████████
██▄         ▀███████████████████████████
████▄        ▀██████████████████████████
██████▄        ▀████████████████████████
████████▄        ████████████████▀ █████
██████████▄       ▀█████████████  ██████
████████████▄       ██████████   ███████
██████████████▄      ▀██████    ████████
████████████████▄▄     ███     █████████
███████████████████▄    ▀     ██████████
█████████████████████▄       ███████████
███████████████████████▄   ▄████████████





▄█████████████████   ███             ███   ███   ███▄                ▄███            █████            ████████████████   ████████████████▄             █████
███▀                 ███             ███   ███   ████▄              ▄████           ███████           ███                ███           ▀███           ███████
███                  ███             ███   ███   █████▄            ▄█████          ███▀ ▀███          ███                ███            ███          ███▀ ▀███
███                  ███             ███   ███   ███ ███▄        ▄███ ███        ▄███▀   ▀███▄        ███                ███           ▄███        ▄███▀   ▀███▄
███                  ███████████████████   ███   ███  ▀██▄      ▄██▀  ███       ▄███▀     ▀███▄       ████████████████   ████████████████▀        ▄███▀     ▀███▄
███                  ███             ███   ███   ███   ▀███    ███▀   ███      ▄███▀       ▀███▄      ███                ███        ███          ▄███▀       ▀███▄
███                  ███             ███   ███   ███    ▀███  ███▀    ███     ▄███▀         ▀███▄     ███                ███         ███        ▄███▀         ▀███▄
███▄                 ███             ███   ███   ███      ██████      ███    ▄███             ███▄    ███                ███          ███      ▄███             ███▄
▀█████████████████   ███             ███   ███   ███       ████       ███   ▄███               ███▄   ████████████████   ███           ███    ▄███               ███▄

|
|
Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:12:15 AM
 #3780

While I agree with you in the business world, in the eyes of the state that isn't how it works.  They need to follow their own statutes.  Really now that btc is defi ed as property actm shares are a deriviative of that property yet still property, but all that is irrlelvant .  The state only cares about the exchange of value as denominated in legal tender.  They don't distinct between btc and actm shares.  Trust me I know how they think.....I work for them.   It is a special way of thinking.....logical....yes,...but in an infantile sort of way.  But these laws are written by simpletons.   This is a classic example of what people talk abiut when they say "by the time the govt figures it out and regulates it, their laws won't apply since the speed of the technology moves so fast"  remember the state just needs to be legally sufficient as interpreted by their laws.....no more no less.

Thank you for your insightfulness,

I'm sure with your connections you would be able to provide me direct access with talking to someone who has authority and not a "trust me I know how they think" buckle on their belt.
Pages: « 1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 [189] 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 ... 272 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!