dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:44:48 AM |
|
I dont get why they would run tho, the site has BIG BIG BIG potential and they couldve just paid 1dice1 over a few weeks or months.. The bankroll was meant to be funded by investors anyway, so it would have cost ED nothing to pay 1dice1 his winnings. As I understand it, ED took commission on every bet, win or lose, so they wouldn't have been hurting at all from 1dice1's lucky run.
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
sobriket
|
|
June 03, 2014, 05:53:39 AM |
|
I dont get why they would run tho, the site has BIG BIG BIG potential and they couldve just paid 1dice1 over a few weeks or months.. The bankroll was meant to be funded by investors anyway, so it would have cost ED nothing to pay 1dice1 his winnings. One of whom being the investor who supposedly holds the keys to the cold storage.
|
|
|
|
st4nl3y
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 03, 2014, 06:20:53 AM |
|
i can't say i couldn't see this coming, but you guys have no one to blame but yourself for trusting anonymous nice looking sites. why don't you try using gambling sites backed up by a real business.
|
|
|
|
Giftcoins
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
QUIFAS EXCHANGE
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:15:12 AM |
|
i can't say i couldn't see this coming, but you guys have no one to blame but yourself for trusting anonymous nice looking sites. why don't you try using gambling sites backed up by a real business.
All sites were once anonymous and new.
|
|
|
|
f3tus
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:51:54 AM |
|
All sites were once anonymous and new.
And the first ones established a monopoly. It's how the market works.
|
|
|
|
vineyard
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:10:50 PM |
|
I have a question about 1Dice1 that has been bugging me as I have read this thread. As he/she was betting and winning, why wasn't he/she withdrawing funds on the way up. There doesn't seem to be any purpose in maintaining a large deposit balance with ED or any gaming site. I run a bitcoin gaming site https://bitcoin-scratchticket.com. We came online earlier this year. We do not have "investors" funding our bankroll, we do that with our own capital (which is sufficiently large to cover our max bets and statistical variances). As is fairly common, we support instant withdrawal of funds. Because we are relatively new, and perhaps because of the nature of Bitcoin gambling sites, most of our players make deposits and play for a while. As they accumulate winnings, they withdraw them - sometimes 3 or 4 withdrawals in a single session. They don't have to and in fact incur more Bitcoin network transaction fees (0.0001 BTC per withdrawal), but they choose to make frequent withdrawals for their own perceived security. Am I missing something here. Why didn't 1Dice1 progressively withdraw his/her winnings? Another thing that has been bugging me, if I won as much as 1Dice1 on a gaming site, and they refused to pay, I would be a lot angrier then he/she seems to be. Perhaps 1Dice1 is a lot richer than I am.
|
|
|
|
onlinepro
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:22:05 PM |
|
I have a question about 1Dice1 that has been bugging me as I have read this thread. As he/she was betting and winning, why wasn't he/she withdrawing funds on the way up. There doesn't seem to be any purpose in maintaining a large deposit balance with ED or any gaming site. I run a bitcoin gaming site https://bitcoin-scratchticket.com. We came online earlier this year. We do not have "investors" funding our bankroll, we do that with our own capital (which is sufficiently large to cover our max bets and statistical variances). As is fairly common, we support instant withdrawal of funds. Because we are relatively new, and perhaps because of the nature of Bitcoin gambling sites, most of our players make deposits and play for a while. As they accumulate winnings, they withdraw them - sometimes 3 or 4 withdrawals in a single session. They don't have to and in fact incur more Bitcoin network transaction fees (0.0001 BTC per withdrawal), but they choose to make frequent withdrawals for their own perceived security. Am I missing something here. Why didn't 1Dice1 progressively withdraw his/her winnings? Another thing that has been bugging me, if I won as much as 1Dice1 on a gaming site, and they refused to pay, I would be a lot angrier then he/she seems to be. Perhaps 1Dice1 is a lot richer than I am. Well he doesn't seem rich, someone said he started with only about 0.29 BTCBut maybe he is happy about those 55 BTC+ he alredy got. Still 190x his original money. And what diffrend would it make if he screams here? Nothing, so better just enjoy those money he got and hope he get rest too.
|
|
|
|
blizeH
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:40:19 PM |
|
Yeah, worst case scenario for 1DiCe1 is that he's still made loads of money. Unfortunately it seems like the situation for investors is lose/lose - it'd be nice to have what very little I still had invested back at some point though ;_; (assuming the investigation comes up clean of course)
|
|
|
|
MICRO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1037
CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:38:34 PM |
|
All sites were once anonymous and new.
And the first ones established a monopoly. It's how the market works. Yes, but i think there is still room for impruvments. (some new dice sites)
|
|
|
|
blizeH
|
|
June 03, 2014, 03:24:29 PM |
|
For the most part, Just Dice is perfect. It's just the appearance that could potentially put people off, if that could be worked on I don't think there would be much need for any other Dice sites
|
|
|
|
Wendigo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
|
|
June 03, 2014, 03:28:07 PM |
|
What happened at EveryDice? The site seems offline xX
|
|
|
|
|
boumalo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
|
|
June 03, 2014, 05:41:43 PM |
|
You resumed it well, it is terrible; so simple; we shouldn't put our trust in anonymous people that don't have a big history of trust For exemple, dooglus has been around for a while and showed he was trust worthy; it doesn't mean there is no risks involved in investing in JD but it is at least way way less risky than investing in a new Bitcoin business
|
|
|
|
MICRO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1037
CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com
|
|
June 03, 2014, 05:42:57 PM |
|
For the most part, Just Dice is perfect. It's just the appearance that could potentially put people off, if that could be worked on I don't think there would be much need for any other Dice sites There is always tlthe need for other sites and competition. I personaly dont like jd, design is terible, chat design is terible. No auto bet if u dont use bot. For me primedice is almost perfect. Pd3 will be even better. But we still need new dice sites so the current ones can get better and better. Competition betwen LN and pd made us alot of free happy houtlrs and giveaways.
|
|
|
|
jjc326
|
|
June 03, 2014, 06:27:17 PM |
|
For the most part, Just Dice is perfect. It's just the appearance that could potentially put people off, if that could be worked on I don't think there would be much need for any other Dice sites There is always tlthe need for other sites and competition. I personaly dont like jd, design is terible, chat design is terible. No auto bet if u dont use bot. For me primedice is almost perfect. Pd3 will be even better. But we still need new dice sites so the current ones can get better and better. Competition betwen LN and pd made us alot of free happy houtlrs and giveaways. I do disliek the setup of justdice, also I don't think there is a faucet, is there? LN and PD faucets have gotten me used to using those sites.
|
|
|
|
zahra4571
|
|
June 03, 2014, 07:53:08 PM |
|
Everybody blame support of everydice but what is with 1dice1, does anyone suspect about this player found exploit and make this hardly believe large amount
|
|
|
|
onlinepro
|
|
June 03, 2014, 07:56:14 PM |
|
Everybody blame support of everydice but what is with 1dice1, does anyone suspect about this player found exploit and make this hardly believe large amount
Maybe, but why haven't ED showed any proof of that then?
|
|
|
|
deadley
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1064
|
|
June 03, 2014, 08:08:43 PM |
|
Everybody blame support of everydice but what is with 1dice1, does anyone suspect about this player found exploit and make this hardly believe large amount
Maybe, but why haven't ED showed any proof of that then? 1Dice1 still here, and EveryDice site gone. who run away its EveryDice So its clear who scammed who.
|
|
|
|
vineyard
|
|
June 03, 2014, 08:22:01 PM |
|
I have a question about 1Dice1 that has been bugging me as I have read this thread. As he/she was betting and winning, why wasn't he/she withdrawing funds on the way up. There doesn't seem to be any purpose in maintaining a large deposit balance with ED or any gaming site. I run a bitcoin gaming site https://bitcoin-scratchticket.com. We came online earlier this year. We do not have "investors" funding our bankroll, we do that with our own capital (which is sufficiently large to cover our max bets and statistical variances). As is fairly common, we support instant withdrawal of funds. Because we are relatively new, and perhaps because of the nature of Bitcoin gambling sites, most of our players make deposits and play for a while. As they accumulate winnings, they withdraw them - sometimes 3 or 4 withdrawals in a single session. They don't have to and in fact incur more Bitcoin network transaction fees (0.0001 BTC per withdrawal), but they choose to make frequent withdrawals for their own perceived security. Am I missing something here. Why didn't 1Dice1 progressively withdraw his/her winnings? Another thing that has been bugging me, if I won as much as 1Dice1 on a gaming site, and they refused to pay, I would be a lot angrier then he/she seems to be. Perhaps 1Dice1 is a lot richer than I am. Well he doesn't seem rich, someone said he started with only about 0.29 BTCBut maybe he is happy about those 55 BTC+ he alredy got. Still 190x his original money. And what diffrend would it make if he screams here? Nothing, so better just enjoy those money he got and hope he get rest too. In the end, it probably wouldn't make much difference at all if 1Dice1 screamed and yelled. I just think it is unusual that someone who lost that much money didn't show more anger.
|
|
|
|
MICRO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1037
CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com
|
|
June 03, 2014, 09:25:36 PM |
|
Everybody blame support of everydice but what is with 1dice1, does anyone suspect about this player found exploit and make this hardly believe large amount
Maybe, but why haven't ED showed any proof of that then? Well than owner of ed wouldnt need to run with 1dice1 and all other investors money. He coulda just show proof or even refuse to pay or just payback deposit or something. But he decided to run with all the money.
|
|
|
|
|