somaton
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 204
Merit: 5
|
|
July 12, 2023, 02:06:44 AM |
|
yep, autofan is not very good compared to other miners.
one more bug: --gpuoffset is not working at all with 3070 ti, but working fine with 3060 ti, 3070, 3080, driver 528.49.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2023, 10:20:42 PM |
|
Will you ever fix fan control I wonder? If miner stays on maximum % set in config(e.g. --fanmax 60) for too long it won't change it anymore when temperature will actually go down...
yep, autofan is not very good compared to other miners.
one more bug: --gpuoffset is not working at all with 3070 ti, but working fine with 3060 ti, 3070, 3080, driver 528.49.
Hi Divinity666, somaton, We'll look into this over the next few days, and see if we can replicate the issues. Thank you for your messages. Cheers
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2023, 10:21:33 PM |
|
hi, 144/5 seems to be broken on dual (btg+zil) mining on vram adjusted cards
Hi Mr.merson, Sorry for the late reply. How much ram do you have on gpu? Possibly there is a better kernel to run btg+zil with low ram. Maybe you could try adding --mode=14, or --mode=15. Let us know how it goes. Cheers
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2023, 10:22:23 PM |
|
intensity not working only for the first few second
Hi Coinx0x, We'll have a look, and see what we can do for the next release. Cheers
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2023, 10:23:16 PM |
|
With zerg/192.7 worker name in format wallet.worker sometimes works, sometimes not. Showing btc wallet instead of worker name when not.
Hi somaton, We've looked into this before, and it seems to be on the pool side. However we'll have another look for the next release. Cheers
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2023, 10:29:31 PM |
|
Hi everyone,A new miniZ version v2.1c is out with support for kHeavyHash algorithm to mine KASPA, and support for new ZIL eppoch.Please find miniZ version v2.1c @ Download page. Changelog: * Added support for kHeavyHash algorithm (KASPA). Fee: 0.8%.* Added support for new ZIL epoch #1.* Improvements for CFX, for some NVIDIA gpus.* Improved invalid shares on CFX. *** Thank you all for the feedback! ***Remember to try --oc1/--oc2/--ocX options for optimum performance. (NVIDIA only) For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages. Download miniZ latest version here. Follow us on TwitterHappy mining!
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
angelbbs
|
|
July 17, 2023, 01:48:01 PM |
|
* Added support for new ZIL epoch #1.
Wrong ZIL epoch detection ************ miniZ v2.1c ************ Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[12.20] devices found: 4 miniZ: Excluding GPU#0 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 miniZ: Excluding GPU#3 Gigabyte RTX2070S Gaming OC 3X Driver: 536.40 Algo: EQ[144,5] [smart-pers] Pool#0: user[**************] server[zhash.auto.nicehash.com] port[9200] ssl[no] pers[auto] Pool#1: user[**************] server[daggerhashimoto.auto.nicehash.com] port[9200] ssl[no] pers[zil] Telemetry: [http://localhost:4002] Temp. limit: [90 C] [INFO ] Mining fee set to 2.00% miniZ<144,5>[10:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 miniZ<144,5>[10:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#2[1] Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 [ 0d 0h 0m09s] 106(106.3)Sol/s 186(185.7)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62 C/40%] 25.00 I/s 49.87(49.87)Sol/s 79( 79.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.631 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [52 C/26%] 28.26 I/s 56.38(56.38)Sol/s 107(106.7)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.528 [ 0d 0h 0m10s] 106(106.2)Sol/s 186(185.7)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62 C/40%] 25.00 I/s 49.88(49.88)Sol/s 79( 79.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.631 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [52 C/26%] 28.25 I/s 56.35(56.35)Sol/s 107(106.7)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.528 miniZ<2nd>[84:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#2[1] Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 miniZ<2nd>[84:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 [INFO ] GPU[2]: Generating DAG #87 [1719+26=1746MB] [INFO ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #87 [1719+26=1746MB] [ 0d 0h 0m20s] 1( 1.1)H/s 111(111.0)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [60 C/40%] 0.21(0.21)H/s 52( 51.7)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4303MHz H/W=0.004 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [50 C/28%] 1.18(1.18)H/s 59( 59.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4303MHz H/W=0.020 [INFO ] GPU[2]: Generated DAG in 3.897
|
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
July 19, 2023, 11:12:32 AM |
|
* Added support for new ZIL epoch #1.
Wrong ZIL epoch detection ************ miniZ v2.1c ************ Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[12.20] devices found: 4 miniZ: Excluding GPU#0 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 miniZ: Excluding GPU#3 Gigabyte RTX2070S Gaming OC 3X Driver: 536.40 Algo: EQ[144,5] [smart-pers] Pool#0: user[**************] server[zhash.auto.nicehash.com] port[9200] ssl[no] pers[auto] Pool#1: user[**************] server[daggerhashimoto.auto.nicehash.com] port[9200] ssl[no] pers[zil] Telemetry: [http://localhost:4002] Temp. limit: [90 C] [INFO ] Mining fee set to 2.00% miniZ<144,5>[10:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 miniZ<144,5>[10:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#2[1] Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 [ 0d 0h 0m09s] 106(106.3)Sol/s 186(185.7)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62 C/40%] 25.00 I/s 49.87(49.87)Sol/s 79( 79.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.631 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [52 C/26%] 28.26 I/s 56.38(56.38)Sol/s 107(106.7)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.528 [ 0d 0h 0m10s] 106(106.2)Sol/s 186(185.7)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62 C/40%] 25.00 I/s 49.88(49.88)Sol/s 79( 79.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.631 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [52 C/26%] 28.25 I/s 56.35(56.35)Sol/s 107(106.7)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.528 miniZ<2nd>[84:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#2[1] Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 miniZ<2nd>[84:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 [INFO ] GPU[2]: Generating DAG #87 [1719+26=1746MB] [INFO ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #87 [1719+26=1746MB] [ 0d 0h 0m20s] 1( 1.1)H/s 111(111.0)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [60 C/40%] 0.21(0.21)H/s 52( 51.7)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4303MHz H/W=0.004 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [50 C/28%] 1.18(1.18)H/s 59( 59.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4303MHz H/W=0.020 [INFO ] GPU[2]: Generated DAG in 3.897 Hi angelbbs, Thanks for your message. We had a look and already fixed this. It will be OK in the next version. The current version 2.1c runs with the correct epoch on shardpool and on crazypool. Cheers
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
Mr.merson
|
|
July 21, 2023, 04:12:35 PM |
|
hi, 144/5 seems to be broken on dual (btg+zil) mining on vram adjusted cards
Hi Mr.merson, Sorry for the late reply. How much ram do you have on gpu? Possibly there is a better kernel to run btg+zil with low ram. Maybe you could try adding --mode=14, or --mode=15. Let us know how it goes. Cheers gp106-3GB. Haven't you thought about the need to do a memtweak rework? GDDR5 memories also benefit from "memory timing" one of the few miners that applied correctly this function was t-rex and nbminer reached speeds of 24-26 mhs on ethehash based algorithm, it would be beneficial for mining zil and pascal series https://imgur.com/a/TdV52Rg
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
July 23, 2023, 05:28:10 AM |
|
Why do I get miner crashing every 24 hours or so with error 77 on random GPU when I run all 8 cards with 1 instance(1 window) of miner + some invalid shares(3-4 per 1500 or 1 day), but if I run each card with separate instance of miner(8 windows) I don't get any crashes for 2 weeks(and I simply didn't mine longer that until I close miners myself) and may be 1-2 invalid share during that time from all cards combined? It's not that convenient to run 8 miners from monitoring point of view, but I guess I'll have to because these crashes just irritate me(+ more invalid shares)... Plz fix this if possible, tnx! ps Im minig Flux btw.
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
August 01, 2023, 05:44:23 AM |
|
On AMD card miner won't restart or shut down if card crashes, it will continue to work and produce invalid shares: [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.81 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 31.47k [ 0d 9h45m00s|05:47:17] S: 80/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 74.21(73.53)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1864MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.1%) (3.9%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.43 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 35.33k [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.05 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 35.33k [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.65 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 35.17k [ 0d 9h50m00s|05:52:17] S: 83/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 73.28(73.53)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1859MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.2%) (3.8%) [ 0d 9h55m00s|05:57:17] S: 83/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.91 I/s 73.26(73.52)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1865MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.2%) (3.8%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 10.32 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 36.17k [ 0d10h 0m00s|06:02:17] S: 84/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.90 I/s 73.56(73.52)Sol/s 112(112.0)W clk=1841MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.3%) (3.7%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.24 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 36.53k [ 0d10h 5m00s|06:07:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 72.81(73.54)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1859MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.3%) (3.7%) [ 0d10h10m00s|06:12:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.58(73.54)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1864MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.3%) (3.7%) [ 0d10h15m00s|06:17:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [51 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.82(73.55)Sol/s 112(112.0)W clk=1853MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [ 0d10h20m00s|06:22:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [51 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.97(73.57)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1858MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [ 0d10h25m00s|06:27:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.94 I/s 73.74(73.51)Sol/s 109(111.9)W clk=1855MHz mclk=2122MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [ 0d10h30m00s|06:32:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 72.50(73.47)Sol/s 113(111.9)W clk=1858MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.04 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 12.02 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 16.76 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 7.03 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 17.45 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 52.51 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 11.70 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 16.93 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 6.34 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.92 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 7.87 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=414.72 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.02 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 9.32 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 8.81 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.95 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.67 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.30 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.09 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.10 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 13.57 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.60 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.74 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 6.75 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 13.38 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 8.77 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 10.44 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 26.44 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k
|
|
|
|
deedeeranged
Member
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 42
|
|
August 01, 2023, 10:41:59 AM |
|
On AMD card miner won't restart or shut down if card crashes, it will continue to work and produce invalid shares: [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.81 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 31.47k [ 0d 9h45m00s|05:47:17] S: 80/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 74.21(73.53)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1864MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.1%) (3.9%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.43 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 35.33k [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.05 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 35.33k [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.65 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 35.17k [ 0d 9h50m00s|05:52:17] S: 83/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 73.28(73.53)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1859MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.2%) (3.8%) [ 0d 9h55m00s|05:57:17] S: 83/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.91 I/s 73.26(73.52)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1865MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.2%) (3.8%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 10.32 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 36.17k [ 0d10h 0m00s|06:02:17] S: 84/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.90 I/s 73.56(73.52)Sol/s 112(112.0)W clk=1841MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.3%) (3.7%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.24 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 36.53k [ 0d10h 5m00s|06:07:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 72.81(73.54)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1859MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.3%) (3.7%) [ 0d10h10m00s|06:12:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.58(73.54)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1864MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.3%) (3.7%) [ 0d10h15m00s|06:17:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [51 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.82(73.55)Sol/s 112(112.0)W clk=1853MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [ 0d10h20m00s|06:22:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [51 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.97(73.57)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1858MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [ 0d10h25m00s|06:27:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.94 I/s 73.74(73.51)Sol/s 109(111.9)W clk=1855MHz mclk=2122MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [ 0d10h30m00s|06:32:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT 100% [52 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 72.50(73.47)Sol/s 113(111.9)W clk=1858MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%) [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.04 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 12.02 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 16.76 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 7.03 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 17.45 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 52.51 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 11.70 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 16.93 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 6.34 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.92 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 7.87 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=414.72 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.02 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 9.32 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 8.81 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.95 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.67 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.30 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.09 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.10 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 13.57 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 5.60 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 4.74 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 6.75 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 13.38 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 8.77 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 10.44 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k [WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share [INFO ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 26.44 /810.42 pool: 4.00 net: 39.83k If it possible try with lowering mclock to 2100, I found out if the mclock is set a little to high you get this with RDNA2 cards.
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
August 01, 2023, 05:54:55 PM |
|
No its core voltage in my case. But whatever the cause the problem still remains - miner not gonna restart like on nvidia cards...
|
|
|
|
angelbbs
|
|
August 09, 2023, 07:53:03 PM |
|
* Added support for new ZIL epoch #1.
Wrong ZIL epoch detection ************ miniZ v2.1c ************ Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[12.20] devices found: 4 miniZ: Excluding GPU#0 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 miniZ: Excluding GPU#3 Gigabyte RTX2070S Gaming OC 3X Driver: 536.40 Algo: EQ[144,5] [smart-pers] Pool#0: user[**************] server[zhash.auto.nicehash.com] port[9200] ssl[no] pers[auto] Pool#1: user[**************] server[daggerhashimoto.auto.nicehash.com] port[9200] ssl[no] pers[zil] Telemetry: [http://localhost:4002] Temp. limit: [90 C] [INFO ] Mining fee set to 2.00% miniZ<144,5>[10:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 miniZ<144,5>[10:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#2[1] Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 [ 0d 0h 0m09s] 106(106.3)Sol/s 186(185.7)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62 C/40%] 25.00 I/s 49.87(49.87)Sol/s 79( 79.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.631 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [52 C/26%] 28.26 I/s 56.38(56.38)Sol/s 107(106.7)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.528 [ 0d 0h 0m10s] 106(106.2)Sol/s 186(185.7)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62 C/40%] 25.00 I/s 49.88(49.88)Sol/s 79( 79.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.631 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [52 C/26%] 28.25 I/s 56.35(56.35)Sol/s 107(106.7)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.528 miniZ<2nd>[84:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#2[1] Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 miniZ<2nd>[84:0:00.0: 6786]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 [INFO ] GPU[2]: Generating DAG #87 [1719+26=1746MB] [INFO ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #87 [1719+26=1746MB] [ 0d 0h 0m20s] 1( 1.1)H/s 111(111.0)W 1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [60 C/40%] 0.21(0.21)H/s 52( 51.7)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4303MHz H/W=0.004 2>GTX 1070 ` 100% [50 C/28%] 1.18(1.18)H/s 59( 59.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=4303MHz H/W=0.020 [INFO ] GPU[2]: Generated DAG in 3.897 Hi angelbbs, Thanks for your message. We had a look and already fixed this. It will be OK in the next version. The current version 2.1c runs with the correct epoch on shardpool and on crazypool. Cheers still waiting for a fix for nicehash
|
|
|
|
kablamis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 1
|
|
August 20, 2023, 09:56:29 PM Last edit: August 20, 2023, 10:10:54 PM by kablamis |
|
Hello. I have configured the miniz miner to dual mine flux with zil ( Version 2.1C ). in the begining of the miner, apperas the info that it will mine flux and zil to my adresses, but on crazypool theres no activity from this miner, and on the info show on the webshell of hiveos, the miniz never goes to mine zil . never ever..What is the problem with this version and how to solve it please?
In the extra settings i have this.
--url=ZilWallet.NameWorker@eu.crazypool.org:5005 --log --extra
Thankx
|
|
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
September 20, 2023, 03:16:37 AM |
|
Hi everyone,A new miniZ version v2.2c is out with support for EthashB3 and EvrProgPoW algorithms to mine Rethereum and Evrmore, respectively. This new version also comes with important fixes, for example fixed issue when mining ProgPow/KawPoW that were causing miner error. Please find miniZ version v2.2c @ Download page. https://miniz.cc/download/Changelog: * Added support for EthashB3 algorithm (Rethereum, RTH). Fee: 1%. * Added support for EvrProgPoW algorithm (Evrmore, EVR). Fee: 1%. * Removed DAG generation when mining ProgPow/Ethash fee, for most cases. * Fixed issue when mining ProgPow/KawPoW that caused miner error. * Fixed Zil issues when mining with Nicehash.*** Thank you all for the feedback! *** Remember to try --oc1/--oc2/--ocX options for optimum performance. (NVIDIA only) For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages. Download miniZ latest version here. Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/miniZ_minerHappy mining!
|
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter
|
|
|
Eujenvanino
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2023, 01:25:52 PM |
|
Кaк зaпycтить EvrProgPoW в cpeдe линeкc? Hигдe никaкoгo oпиcaния нeт Кaк выбpaть aлгopитм? eгo нeт в cпиcкe!
How to run EvrProgPoW in Linux environment? There is no description anywhere How to choose an algorithm? it's not on the list!
|
|
|
|
bizcoin85
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2023, 11:06:10 PM |
|
Hello Team having an issue with MiniZ trying to mine Zelhash via Nicehash. Getting all Stale: Above Target Level shares. Have tested with Gminer and LolMiner both work without issue. Using MiniZ via HiveOS any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
Josef997
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
October 15, 2023, 03:26:47 AM |
|
i have an issue with BTG dual with Zill it's not working as well please advise.
|
|
|
|
|