After reading all your points you come across as a Rolling Stone that has no stand whatsoever.
After reading this topic I got to a few points to say:
1.At first I thought the user Lauda is just using the reputation to get away with the coins.
2.Not offering the coins from any fork, I consider in any way a SCAM.
So?
3.I have realised that Lauda was not the only escrow as so, it is not the person with 3000 BTC, just 1000 (with altcoins also).
How did u reach this idea that it was an equal threeway split?
4.I have understood and I find normal not to share specifics addresses that might reveal any idendity of investors.
They can share escrow ones. I don't think people are interested in all contribution addresses.
5.There is a complete and continous hate arround the user Lauda.
How did u reach this conclusion? From the trust table; s/he has more greens than reds.
6.The user OGnasty have no idea how an ICO works, it is just a continous hate towards Lauda.
How does an ICO work?
I don't think there is a formula; it simply works or doesn't.
7.The other "trusted" or older users involved in discussion are not following the logic of any event that happened or what is happening.
IMHO Because the "trusted" escrows failed to engage or haven't tried to engage constructively.
8.I joined the ICO telegram and there it seems to be a live and ongoing discussion that makes me to have hope.
I have read in the thread that most people who had contentious questions were booted; so obviosuly it is a happy orgy out there.
9.Probably the problem will find a solution between the Escrows and the Core team.
And the investors?
10.The escrow is here just to offer the coins of the ICO, not to see if it is a success.
I didn't know OG or anyone else blamed them for failure of ICO.
11.Using an exchange as escrow, it is a terrible and newbie mistake, I am dissapointed, not for the escrow, for the project owners that they have accepted something like this.
Ddi the escrows confirm this? I think it was a multisig wallet all along. Do u mean the alts or BTC?
Let's wait for this madness to stop and see the solution, even if the community of the ICO is angry, if they receive the ICO, they have nothing more to complain to the escrow.
And how will they receive the ICO? They obviously wouldn't complain if they feel that thy have received a fair share.
It's only core team problem to solve the issue. Problems like these are happening everyday, as a developer I heard hundreds of stories but it is the second time someone told about this topic even if personally I DON'T CARE.
You wrote a mightly lengthy essay for someone WHO DOESN'T CARE. Bugger off.
The only way to stop the FUD arround, that is getting nowhere and the project itself is hurted is to have public the addresses and the history of the addresses.
Obviously none of the others are demanding cute cat pics of the pussy. People are demanding an audit, which is a one word response to what you are saying.
Even more, the real ammount raised is under a big question mark and I don't get the real ammount here, regardless the BCH fork or BCI (a few dollars) or Bitcoin Private whatsoever, who had the decission to sell altcoins and why? I find this very strange and no one asked the right question, I never knew that is an escrow job to convert the altcoins to BTC. Why the altcoins were not sent directly to the projects budget?
Most of us have these questions and even OG who doesn't understand things is asking these; so he must be understanding something to ask the right questions of the perpetually hated pussy.
The idea of transparency is decided in the initial contract with the escrow, if it was not settled why people should cry now about it.
I can't read aramaic; Can u?
Ethics, that's what is left in this crypto world. Let's not destroy the only thing that matters. Find a solution guys and stop these nonsenses
I didn't knew u r a budding politician. Talking things tht have no relevance whatsoever.
In an ethical world; you wouldn't need escrows.
P.S. I'm not an alt.
EDIT:
You wrote a mightly lengthy essay for someone WHO DOESN'T CARE. Bugger off.
I am the only one here that is bored?
I dunno about that; but definitely the only Bored one who is apparently very interested in commenting on the go.