Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[MakeMoneyBtc]

Every campaign manager is different and has different perspectives about rewards. But at the end rules and rules. They are created to be respected, so normally if someone doesn't have 15 approved posts at the end of the week, he/she shouldn't receive the reward. Of course, there could be an extra rule where the manager says that users will receive rewards even if they didn't made enough posts but they will be lower than normal.

[CaMeRoNy]

If you care that you cannot write 10 or 15 messages, then just do not participate in the bounty companies. In my opinion it is quite easy and if you are afraid that a purge of this forum will be deleted some messages, write larger number of commentary.

[baeva2]

Think, that conditions for signature which requires administrator-acceptable. If someone thinks that you need to make a lot of 15 or 10 messages-then you can choose other companies. There is such which require to do 7 or 5 messages.

[happyme1818]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Before you join in any campaign there is already a rule that they post and all of this requirements should be accomplish. I think it is fair because it is already clear  in the rules that you will not get any stakes if you did not meet the required task and you know the consequence if you didn't fulfill your work.

[Razick]

I am satisfied with any project that pays out the rewards at this point since most of them seem to be making us wait for so long before they actually pay out the coins. By then the price of the coins would have dropped so much that they are not worth much anymore. But so far I am satisfied with the rewards that I have gotten from campaigns

[vfrcbv91]

I think that the rules are necessary in order to obey them, so if you need to make 10 posts, then you NEED to make at least 10 posts.

[Ini35]

In every business, rule is very important. Before you joined the campaign, you saw the rules and they are clearly stated. It is now left to you if you can abide to the rules. If you are not comfortable with it and you know you cannot follow it duly, then there is no need to join. If the manager decides not to give you any stake, he is right.
Had it been he allows you to bridge the rule by posting less, then others too will do the same and that might lead to a faulty campaign.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

That is rule and we can againts it, and all bounty managers have their rights to make decision whether participants get stake or not. I know it is hard if we almost reach minimum post and not get stake, and you know what is worse than that? you make post with minimum requirements on rule, and topic that you have posted on that is deleted 

[Gekkoo]

Yes, I always got good rewards through the signature campaign! Of course, because I'm a Member, I'm proud to demonstrate this position, but in relation to blog campaigns, signature campaign is not behind in terms of rewards and as I'm always active in the forum, I find it incredible to be paid to post opinions and some shitopinions.

[white_star]

Yes, I always got good rewards through the signature campaign! Of course, because I'm a Member, I'm proud to demonstrate this position, but in relation to blog campaigns, signature campaign is not behind in terms of rewards and as I'm always active in the forum, I find it incredible to be paid to post opinions and some shitopinions.

It's okay with me to earn small rewards as far as it's worth my effort to participate in such program I believe as a reward I earn still it has a good value in market and can have a potential to grow more. It's been good here in crypto in where we can expect earnings without investment.

[Laxus215]

The bigger problem regarding signature campaign is ICO project management reduces the allocated signature funds from the bounty campaign or they don't pay as they bounty Ann announces. About incomplete post there must be some relaxation to give reduced stakes based on the task completed out of targeted posts. Also as a Bounty hunter one must obey the rules of the bounty campaign to complete the assign task weekly.

[azisjz4]

I am currently participating in a signature campaign, I think the rules issued by the bounty manager are fair enough, in the rules written minimum post a week is 10, then we must post according to target. if we can only post 9 in a week, then that is our mistake and of course we will not be rewarded. If we participate in the signature campain, then of course we must follow the rules set by the bounty manager, and when our posts are lacking, it is our fault

[irenegaming]

Whether it's fair or not is subjective, I've been in quite a few signature campaigns and I think some bounty managers are more flexible than others, equally if they don't give me the stakes because I don't complete the required weekly post, I can't do anything, since the rules are pretty clear on the subject and I agreed before entering the bounty.

[samycoin]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Sometimes I'm satisfied but sometimes not because some of bounty project a good rewards to participants they give us a small amount of reward after months of working with them. I hope they give a fair reward to who joined signature campaign.

[carrigan]

Yeah, every BM has their rules for th signature campaign. I always participate in the signature campaign. So far, I follow the rules because that is what I must fulfil. When I'm supposed to make at least 10 posts per week, I will do more, about at least 12 posts to anticipate when there are deleted thread or posts. I think that it is fair enough because the BM has already clearly states on the rules.

[3la9l_kolbaCa]

Yes most of the time I was satisfied with token reward given by a certain campaign. Sometimes it doesn't provide an enough value to me in times of trading, but I can find it more challenging during the holding period.
Other hunters were frustrated, but they don't have to feel it because in every project it needs to reach the hardcap. We cannot assure it will be met, so it's expected the token given to bounty participants will be reduced and it also happen to me twice on the previous projects I had.

[mbluxs]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

if you only finish outside the exact conditions it will not be accepted and will not receive shares in that week, because it is an obligation to post 15 or 10 yes we must be able to do it because from the beginning we already know the terms, so in my opinion it is fair and reasonable. .

[oktana]

As long as I follow the signature campaign, of course I have to follow the rules because I have made 9 posts with the rules of having to make 10 posts in 1 week, but what happened I did not get stake that week even though I have posted 90% of what they ask, then from the above case it is clear we have to make a post in accordance with the applicable rules and if we make a post of more than 10 then we still get a stake and I think that is fair enough for me.

[blockchainmarketus]

Signauture campaign now it s not satisfactory. The participants are too many so the rewards will be too small. I like to join manager taht limit sig camp participants. it will earn better than unlimited members. Strict manager is important because he will disqualify the lazy members. I think income from sig campaign is getting lower now.

[desticy]

I recently returned to the forum, but judging by the reviews, some companies pay really well, especially for a signature, so I decided to try to participate in one of the projects I liked, let's see what happens.