Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[shoreno]

< Snip >

I've seen some campaign managers that occasionally give rewards even they don't reach the required posts. But for me, they really shouldn't receive any at all. Rules are rules and it's very easy to reach the quota in 2-3 days because some of the guidelines are very lenient. And if you don't like that then you should not apply in the first place and demand things you are not forced to accept.

If you are the manager , you are strict  .  while other managers will still give a chance to their participants if ever they missed some post because there are many reasons that can affect the post count of a user  . it maybe get deleted by mods , the user might be busy , the user reach the qouta but some post are on different boards  . etc   ,  thats why we must give them a second chance  if they still fail thats the time that you will removed them  or not pay them .

[1715409221]

1715409221

[pealr12]

I wanna ask if youre always reading the rules before joining in a bounty campaign. It is so clear that if you do not reach the required  post within a week you wont get any stakes, and 2 conseccutive weeks will result into elimination in some bounty.

[voltesbit777]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Signature campaign, is same goes like you are applying for a job in a company and its just temporarily only, but the payment is very rewarding depending on the rank you're applying for. And having a rules was a normal things I guess. So, as a bounty hunter we have no right to complaint, because before you submit your application there's a rules that you need to accept if you want to be a part of promoting the project then if you don't like the rules you can ignore and don't try to attempt to participate anyway.

[EvgenOrel]

I regularly recommend my friends to participate in various reliable signature campaigns. Because work in this direction really provides attractive opportunities for generating income and achieving success. But for such a result, it is necessary to study the rules and requirements of a particular project.

[bonker]

Signature campaigns in service sections changed a lot,more managers prefer paying to number of posts people creating rather than setting a weekly target and ask the people to make to get rewards so if you want that then join on btc signature campaigns.

[coin-investor]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

15 post a week is not that hard to do, that's only 2 posts a day with only one day where you are going to post three if you cannot follow an easy and simple rule then better not participate in a signature campaign, 15 post to me is fair if they ask 30 to 40 then we can ask for percentage of the stakes.

[shoreno]

15 post a week is not that hard to do, that's only 2 posts a day with only one day where you are going to post three if you cannot follow an easy and simple rule then better not participate in a signature campaign, 15 post to me is fair if they ask 30 to 40 then we can ask for percentage of the stakes.

15 post is the lowest max post for any sig campaigns including the ones that pays on bitcoin and etherium   . other campaigns are more harder than this because their target qouta per week is 25 to 35 post  .  while other campaigns have a max 60 post per week  , higher than this are consider inapropriate anymore as they can cause a massive spam to the forum  . right now im a campaign that pays good and im going to say that im satisfied with it .

[Pffrt]

It's a hassle if there is a fixed amount more than 10, I would not join any of the altcoin signature campaign if they require to post atleast 15 per week because I may have been away and would not able to continue. However, I think good managers do some care sometimes.

[rijaljun]

15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns. By making 3 posts a day, you are able to complete your tasks, is that too hard? I have ever managed a bounty campaign and when my participant can't complete minimum amount of post, usually I will ask them to create more posts next week (In case they only created 9 posts this week while the minimum is 10 posts, I will credit them stakes for this week. Then next week they need to create minimum 11 posts to be able to get stakes)

This kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.

[Pffrt]

15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns.

If you are refering active forum member, I think no one continuously post, at least not those member who are here for learning. Only people who are earning post daily, this is why 15 posts is quite high for me.

[carlfebz2]

15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns. By making 3 posts a day, you are able to complete your tasks, is that too hard? I have ever managed a bounty campaign and when my participant can't complete minimum amount of post, usually I will ask them to create more posts next week (In case they only created 9 posts this week while the minimum is 10 posts, I will credit them stakes for this week. Then next week they need to create minimum 11 posts to be able to get stakes)

This kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.

Being too strict sometimes would really give out some negative impressions as you as a manager.Im impress on how other managers do have consideration into their participants but as a bounty hunter
complying rules or just following it is a really must thing for you not to be able to experience problems or lost of stakes. Rewards would vary yet each project would be entirely different and when it comes to price
it vary on the projects potential.

[btcmegastar]

We have to follow their rules otherwise, they will not give any stakes but recently we have seen many companies are not allocating huge amounts to the Signature Campaign, because now many people are spreading the word but most of the people are spamming the forum based on this managers are closely watching people who are spread the word by wearing the signature. It is our wish whether to join the campaign or not.

[ShowOff]

We have to follow their rules otherwise, they will not give any stakes but recently we have seen many companies are not allocating huge amounts to the Signature Campaign, because now many people are spreading the word but most of the people are spamming the forum based on this managers are closely watching people who are spread the word by wearing the signature. It is our wish whether to join the campaign or not.

For now maybe only content campaign which can almost have same allocation with signature. But sometime it filled a lot because people can easy to make blog post. There are no choice for us maybe if some signature campaign have limit participants, will be good.

[bhadz]

There are considerable managers that are still giving rewards or stakes and payment to those nearly hitting the minimum quota. But some conditions that the payment isn't full, it may be in half or 1/4 depends on the managers assessment. From the very beginning, those rules are already there and as participant you should obey to the campaign's rule. It isn't hard to follow, you just have to obey, and don't do anything against the rule of that campaign.

[rijaljun]

Signature campaigns in service sections changed a lot,more managers prefer paying to number of posts people creating rather than setting a weekly target and ask the people to make to get rewards so if you want that then join on btc signature campaigns.

That's because people won't get any motivation from weekly minimum post rules. Based on my research from bounty hunters, there are a lot people doing their task in just 3 days (just to  meet the rules so that they are deserve to get the whole week stakes) and the in the rest days they are not active in the forum. Paid per post bounty gives much motivation to the participant since the more active they are, the more rewards they can earn.

[Fedots83]

In fact, there are excellent opportunities to quickly and easily receive a stable income. But before starting work with any signature campaign, you must carefully study the rules and requirements of a specific project in order to avoid common mistakes.

[_Django05_]

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Well it all depends on the Campaign Rules, Managers and of course the "Rate". The higher the rate the stricter the rules are.
We're talking about money and employment here and we are all bound by the rules. "If you can't abide by our rules, we'll find someone who can".

However, some campaigns does not have that stricter rules, I've seen someone not reaching the required post and yet he got paid and the CM doesn't terminated him. Some campaign managers give you chance to amend your shortcomings and some don't.

Just to be safe, follow every rules the campaign set for you to follow.

[jrrsparkles]

In fact, there are excellent opportunities to quickly and easily receive a stable income. But before starting work with any signature campaign, you must carefully study the rules and requirements of a specific project in order to avoid common mistakes.

There is no stable income from signature campaigns,the campaign manager or the project team chan change their terms at any time and do you think signature campaigns will last long?

[96InnIvanova]

Hey guys, I suggest you take part in a cool bounty from the Gexan project!
NO KYC! Payments monthly! The GEX coin is being traded on the exchange!
Bounty started yesterday and will run until June 30th.
May 10, 2019 Gexan project will hold IEO on the exchange, which is included in the top 25 Coinmarketcap. Thus, by the end of the award, the GEX coin will be sold on exchanges.
This is a very cool offer!
Sign up for a reward in the bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136521
link to ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136520
Web-wallet Gexan: http://lottery.gexan.io/
Web site: http://gexan.io/

[dzhan]

Nowadays the numbers of promising signature campaigns is really limited, and the reward in BTC is very small, there are only the bounty signature campaigns which pay with their tokens, and you have to wait a long time until the token gets listed in exchanges, and until it hits the good price.