Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[Gozie51]

We have to understand that bounty and signature campaign are serious engagements. When you apply and get signed in with a bounty/signature campaign, is as just like you have been taken in an office job to work and deliver as to the terms of the contract which also has conditions to fulfill and accomplish both ways (from the company/employer and worker, you the employee), so you also have to follow that way in bounties.

Again, the manager of the bounty is under obligation to the ico company too. I know that some icos take part in the selection of applications and won't be surprised if they are also involved in the counting of qualified post too.

However, we can do a pm to the managers if there is a good reason because they are also humans.

[itasannah]

as a bounty hunter we must follow the rules that exist. if we want to get the maximum results, then we also have to try optimally. it has become a consequence if we don't get the rewards because we don't obey the rules. completing the bounty is important thing because from that we can learn to be responsible in something.

[Westinhome]

They have a time that are i'm not satisfied because it was be long weeks to participate in the signature campaign but the bounty rewards are not enough. So that's why ill participated in the campaign are trusted to pay and have some good bounty rewards.

[gabum19]

I have this same kind of situation you have, i just post exactly 15 post in the end of the week and i did not recieve a stake when i check my reports i only got 14 post from it i was wondering that the moderator have been delete one of my post. So sad i did not notice it. So now, i have posting my report in more than the said 15 post. Its better to secure right now.

[robelneo]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

This has been the rule since the start of signature campaign and don't likely to change, 15 post in a week is not to much, you need to put effort that you want to have that reward by following the rules strictly, I think this rule is fair to all, posters and managers if we want to get the rewards then show them that we deserve it.

[carlisle1]

Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

I don't know if OP is just a Fool and stupid,or a typical idiot..attaining Senior member but asking this stupidity..15 post a week as a requirement is only a peanut if you only have a single account now tell me whats the big reason for you not to comply on this?thats why many bad impressions are throwing towards campaign participants because of the idiotic people like you

[omedian]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Thanks for raising this question, I see that more and more Bounty Campaigns require to make 15 posts a week, which is ineffecient in my view, this may lead to increased spam activity on the forum.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

I think it's fair to deny those participants who haven't made the required number of posts, because it's a really time consuming process to count a share from a weekly stake for such users. It would be more suitable for Twitter/Reddit/Facebook bounties rather than for Bitcointalk Signature.

[acheampong64]

Ideally, rules are rules and so you've got to abide by the rules of the job you do. Imagine writing an exam that needs a 50% pass mark. If you don't get to that 50% and get to about 45% it may depend on your teacher who may or may not give you additional marks but you've failed in the real sense. Bounty campaigns are "jobs" and you should fulfill your job description to get paid. I don't blame managers who award 0 to those who don't reach quota. I have been a victim before and I accepted in good faith...

[Tduty]

Yes, I am participating in a signature campaign. And yes, I'm very satisfied with joining the signature campaign. I think we must follow that rules in order to have the stakes for the week. It's not a hard thing to make 10/15 posts per week. If you make 3 posts per day I think it is enough.

[StarSLight]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

It's absolutely honest. Participation in bounty companies implies compliance with certain rules, which all participants must perform clearly! And if you write 9 posts out of 10- you do not fulfill the conditions! You will not complain if your boss does not pay you a salary for not completing your work!

[brjameng]

I think those rules created to makes everything going as it should.
In my opinion, by following those rules makes it fair for everyone who join the campaign and it would makes the token distribution easy based on the work that are accepted.

[USDOLLAR]

If you go for in Signature campaigns I suggest that do consistency with specific principles, which all members must perform unmistakably. my thought is we should take after those guidelines with a specific end goal to have the stakes for the week. simply do the valuable post for the fate of crypto. you have to put the exertion that you need to have that reward by following the principles entirely, I think this administer is reasonable for all, Whatever we do, besides, we do it with sweat and our own considerations will positively be more fulfilled.

[phm]

rules are changed during signature bounty some times and nowadays more often not in real time! and I find this  unfair

[aizen10]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

For me, doing a job about 75% of post a week is like to be considered to have any amount of stakes instead of putting nothing, it is very unfair to us hunters to be given a zero stakes for about 75% posting a week. Even a half of stakes per week is enough, because if you do a lot of post for example 15/18, the 3 post is no adding any stakes right. So it is more likely with this op concern.

[bolshojkush]

For me 10-15 posts per week is acceptable. You need to do 2-3 fasts a day, it's very simple. They pay very good money for signature, so these conditions are acceptable.

[Levious]

The biggest problem now is not the number of replies, but not a few bounty is worth participating. Most of the rewards give you a small return.

[ekechie]

If you post more than required, you will still get the same stake, but if you post less than required, you won't take a stake, rules are rules, so it is always good to post more than required, just in case some of your post gets deleted.

[Mr.ZODIAC]

If you post more than required, you will still get the same stake, but if you post less than required, you won't take a stake, rules are rules, so it is always good to post more than required, just in case some of your post gets deleted.

recently very often our messages are deleted by moderators and thus one can not get their steaks. While many Bounty companies have a manager who does not maintain spreadsheets on time. That as a result can lead to minimum earnings.

[sinachy]

For me anytime i join signature campaign, i always make more than the required post and i always get my stake, i think making more than required is a good idea, and of course if you make below the required post, you shouldn't get a stake because it is clearly stated before you join?

[lordtprinz]

I think the rewards for signatures campaign is still okay Because they do allocate up to 20% of the bounty for it and it makes it look good to sometime. So I'm still satisfied to some extent.