Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 03:24:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival! KGW, POS/POW hybrid [TRADING ON CRYPTSY]  (Read 51743 times)
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 05:31:53 AM
 #241

Sounds fun, any free samples?

Crazy; as you know mid conference Facebook bought Oculus Rift.

They were the small cool booth on Tuesday and by Wednesday/Thursday they were worth more than at least half of all of the other companies there.

Combined.
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715268248
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268248

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268248
Reply with quote  #2

1715268248
Report to moderator
1715268248
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268248

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268248
Reply with quote  #2

1715268248
Report to moderator
1715268248
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268248

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268248
Reply with quote  #2

1715268248
Report to moderator
ckoeber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 05:38:14 AM
 #242

Awesome! Sounds like fun. I just started to get a little worried because I can't connect to any nodes currently, so can't even solo mine without creating a third fork Cheesy

Just wanted to make sure it wasn't my end and that you were aware. Thanks!

I am really sorry; I can't connect to my server on the east coast and I am all the way on the west coast.

I do know your wallets are safe; I have the latest backup on a separate server which I can see.

I bet is just a hiccup that a reboot will take care of but I need to be there, of course Smiley
danbi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 07:57:24 PM
 #243

How do we decide which fork is the "good" one? Smiley

BTC: 15cJkRupKAkGr6sTxj1Uzb6uHbvuRyK1GL
DMD: dJZEqNcjiUiMMd8DKBFS9oMWtArAD2GCHr
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 06:35:42 AM
 #244

How do we decide which fork is the "good" one? Smiley

Code:
addnode=148.251.70.194
addnode=192.95.29.176
addnode=203.20.114.252

I think the first IP may be Cryptsy, or at least it is connected as a peer to Cryptsy. I did a test deposit earlier and it succeeded.
cannonfodder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 31, 2014, 01:43:24 PM
 #245

Any chance someone could re-upload the blockchain somewhere since the link posted here isn't working? I'm unable to sync past block 18924 using the addnodes posted here. Thanks.
icecube45 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 07:16:11 PM
 #246

Any chance someone could re-upload the blockchain somewhere since the link posted here isn't working? I'm unable to sync past block 18924 using the addnodes posted here. Thanks.

I'll try to do so tonight.

His link should be back up soon
obelisk910
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 05:14:32 AM
 #247

So after updating my galaxycoin.conf to include the 3 nodes almightyruler posted earlier, I am now able to connect to 1 peer. However, my wallet isn't syncing. (Client has been open for several hours.)

Is this reason for concern? Is something wrong with my setup or are others experiencing the same troubles?
harveyweizhao
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 05:29:33 AM
 #248

Try following nodes:

212.83.187.132
192.95.29.176
162.220.246.58
188.226.169.38
27.118.30.26
192.92.129.48
54.201.121.142
155.69.222.247

最新资讯 请follow微博:Harvey老狼 http://weibo.com/u/1290487752
obelisk910
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 06:00:17 AM
 #249

Awesome, I'm up to date now! Thanks for the addresses.
cannonfodder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 01, 2014, 04:20:46 PM
 #250

Try following nodes:

212.83.187.132
192.95.29.176
162.220.246.58
188.226.169.38
27.118.30.26
192.92.129.48
54.201.121.142
155.69.222.247

Awesome, I'm up to date now! Thanks for the addresses.

Still a no go for me. Only syncs up to block 18924. Still hoping for the blockchain to get re-uploaded or for chriskoeber.com to come back online.
Painful Truth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 01, 2014, 05:46:35 PM
 #251

How do we decide which fork is the "good" one? Smiley

By checking the current block. Compare with the good fork.
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
April 02, 2014, 11:22:27 AM
 #252

I think there may be an issue with the checkpointing code.

I'm synced to block 280156 (0000000011da6f86eb6d51a675f6af2101272fd2f4eee95686b3c75966fc9352), presumably on the correct chain, yet RPC 'getcheckpoint' shows a checkpoint from August last year:

Code:
{
    "synccheckpoint" : "0000000762d2c9455efbe448e9b47fd45c9690429fc3ab9305384f90b61147aa",
    "height" : 51870,
    "timestamp" : "2013-08-03 17:46:50 UTC"
}

I noticed this when doing testing for a coin I'm currently reviving. Some other PoS/PoW coins are also showing similar behaviour... but some are showing the expected newest checkpoint. This is just a wild guess, but I think that the code may only store checkpoints at the time you first install the coin. So the highest checkpoint at that time gets stored in the db, but any additional hardcoded checkpoints from future releases are not recognised. I don't know if this is intentional, but reusing the ppcoin code without changing the central checkpointing features (keys etc) has broken it, or it's a known bug that has already been fixed in some coins.
danbi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 01:19:09 PM
Last edit: April 05, 2014, 08:05:20 AM by danbi
 #253

Is PoS working for anyone? I see my wallets try to PoS and end up with generating 0.0 coins, like this:

04/04/14 09:52:41 StakeMiner : proof-of-stake block found 1aec5486366a4a0abb7801c8976895da3cfbfac9e75e882986554c5342b777f
2
04/04/14 09:52:41 BitcoinMiner:
04/04/14 09:52:41 new block found  
  hash: 1aec5486366a4a0abb7801c8976895da3cfbfac9e75e882986554c5342b777f2  
target: 0000070369000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
04/04/14 09:52:41 CBlock(hash=1aec5486366a4a0abb7801c8976895da3cfbfac9e75e882986554c5342b777f2, ver=5, hashPrevBlock=0000
029c97ede08ae5d89bf440d4da1fb0912e969d3f8ec182d6c9304860abd3, hashMerkleRoot=ee2fb589568ae33fcf7860b9ab31ec23526238d15d97
9a431873e78c014cff97, nTime=1396605160, nBits=1e070369, nNonce=0, vtx=2, vchBlockSig=3045022100c6fa41c382b3b7f204ed44578b
a086aea654fdd52c0c4e7b5b5078ca4f0e963b02201bdfe0701b6fac850568ac9440d71fa38c605 8f1804206e18440105c0a03998a)
04/04/14 09:52:41   Coinbase(hash=55419e4618, nTime=1396605160, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0)
    CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 032e48040106062f503253482f)
    CTxOut(empty)
  Coinstake(hash=5a1a276cb0, nTime=1396605160, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=3, nLockTime=0)
    CTxIn(COutPoint(d962c37983, 1), scriptSig=30450221008a6a96846b09b9)
    CTxOut(empty)
    CTxOut(nValue=63.0095, scriptPubKey=03e03b99ff204ab13b808ca96449ee29d0a43fb00a5119e0445f9f32fbe6cf86ab OP_CHECKSIG)
    CTxOut(nValue=63.00965, scriptPubKey=03e03b99ff204ab13b808ca96449ee29d0a43fb00a5119e0445f9f32fbe6cf86ab OP_CHECKSIG)
  vMerkleTree: 55419e4618 5a1a276cb0 ee2fb58956
04/04/14 09:52:41 generated 0.00
04/04/14 09:52:41 AddToWallet 5a1a276cb0  new
04/04/14 09:52:41 WalletUpdateSpent found spent coin 127.009nvc d962c37983318db1c65081c50854a5f7a6743cc5311da76811bd282bc1afda4b
04/04/14 09:52:41 SetBestChain: new best=1aec5486366a4a0abb7801c8976895da3cfbfac9e75e882986554c5342b777f2  height=280622  trust=38765705825153  blocktrust=2392192  date=04/04/14 09:52:40
04/04/14 09:52:41 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

I then see an transaction like this

    {
        "account" : "",
        "category" : "generate",
        "amount" : 127.91500000,
        "confirmations" : 125,
        "generated" : true,
        "blockhash" : "1aec5486366a4a0abb7801c8976895da3cfbfac9e75e882986554c5342b777f2",
        "blockindex" : 1,
        "blocktime" : 1396605160,
        "txid" : "5a1a276cb05b69c3b2656f0382b3eced722e4469706751b1feb110a28a0d85f3",
        "time" : 1396605160,
        "timereceived" : 1396605160
    },

Does this mean I actually got 127.915 generated, despite the message? Or was my earning just 0.906?
( wasn't paying attention to the balances)

EDIT: doing some calculations on the transactions, I figure out it is indeed working, and in this case produced 0.906 coins.

BTC: 15cJkRupKAkGr6sTxj1Uzb6uHbvuRyK1GL
DMD: dJZEqNcjiUiMMd8DKBFS9oMWtArAD2GCHr
icecube45 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 07:22:47 AM
 #254

ckoeber
The unzip command on some linux machines will result in corrupted files,
I recommend revising your script to fix this, perhaps upload a .tar.gz file instead of a .zip
icecube45 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 11, 2014, 04:33:35 PM
 #255

Is there an update coming, stuck on block 18924?

You're on linux?
Please use ckoeber's script for upgrading to the 2.0 blockchain, linux wallets have a problem atm updating past that block
SolidStateSurvivor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 500


Solo Miner Legend


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2014, 03:17:37 PM
 #256

Mining Pools:

Chriskoeber- ON NEW FORK
http://galaxypool.chriskoeber.com
0% fees
(Chriskoeber was an active part of keeping the community alive)

Danbi's pool- NEW FORK
http://glxpool.digsys.bg
0% fees

Cryptcoins NEW FORK
http://galaxy.cryptcoins.net
Proportional Payout

Verters NEW FORK
http://glx.verters.com/
1% Fee. Prop Payouts.

http://galaxypool.chriskoeber.com <-- Is no longer up, at least hasn't been for days, or weeks.
http://glx.verters.com/ <-- Neither is this.

http://glxpool.digsys.bg <-- Dunno what this guy is doing but as soon as you start mining there he puts his big solo miner in the pool and takes it out of there when you stop.

http://galaxy.cryptcoins.net <-- 5.23% fees (with the reward included) Enough said. Wink


Founding member of Hashmeisters Inc...
andyge
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 509
Merit: 253



View Profile
April 12, 2014, 03:43:53 PM
 #257

Resistance to attack 51%, seems a little less.
Too few million total 5000.
Wallet connection is slow, is also upload?
danbi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 06:32:44 PM
Last edit: April 12, 2014, 09:19:04 PM by danbi
 #258


http://glxpool.digsys.bg <-- Dunno what this guy is doing but as soon as you start mining there he puts his big solo miner in the pool and takes it out of there when you stop.


I am running this pool.

Would you please explain how this conclusion came to life? I keep three small CPU miners on the pool in order to make it tick, and their total is under 150 hash/s (kilo hashes per second).

Recently, there have been visitors to my pool, perhaps you one of them, who managed to provide over 70% of the network hashing power. Clearly, GLX needs more miners in order to prevent events like this. I even wondered if my pool had not created a fork..

The pool is otherwise ok, I will just use the time when you guys aren't here to update the software a bit. Smiley

EDIT: The new MPOS theme is indeed ugly.

BTC: 15cJkRupKAkGr6sTxj1Uzb6uHbvuRyK1GL
DMD: dJZEqNcjiUiMMd8DKBFS9oMWtArAD2GCHr
icecube45 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 02:34:09 AM
 #259

Hmm, thanks for the update on the pools..
As for ckoeber's pool, it's been going in and out.

And for the stuck wallets... try using connect= (node here) in your config.
icecube45 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 05:28:52 AM
 #260

Hmm, thanks for the update on the pools..
As for ckoeber's pool, it's been going in and out.

And for the stuck wallets... try using connect= (node here) in your config.

Not to sound rude.. But.. Like I said in the post "not working with any solutions on here". I'm a tech & have been building computers & installing/updating software for over 10yrs, add nodes/connect was the first thing I've changed (redownload the with all option I could find).. Are there any other solutions you might have?

Here is what i'm running, on Windows?
****
v2.0.0.0
OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
18924
255318
Wed Jul 17 03:04:10 2013
****
Haha, sorry
We get the variety of users here.
Join me in freenode, ##galaxycoin.
I'll help you 1 on 1
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!