Did you think ICO is necessary?

[dagelan]

I think in some projects, they chose to hold ico to get funding from investors to support and start their projects, but they must provide consequences and real profit prospects as a reciprocal

[wnfakind]

I don’t see why they should be, majority are Failures and scams. There has been more successful projects that never needed the scam.c.o at all and have been successful. If you can find your own project or take the initiative yourself or have an actual community behind to build off of an exchange or a POW coin why even bother. Yes there have been a few successful ones but there is no need for them.

[Pechalka]

In my opinion, the ICO just already has a good status in cryptocurrency and crypto develops by it. The market will crush without ICO, I think.

[Alijiindahaus]

In my opinion, the ICO just already has a good status in cryptocurrency and crypto develops by it. The market will crush without ICO, I think.

You understand that if the market is crushed, then no market ico companies will no longer be left out. He will suffer too. And very much. in any case I hope that large whales realize the negative from their artificial manipulation of the market and stop such actions ..

[blokceyin]

Yeah, sometimes it is really necessary but sometimes really unnecessary. Also there is a new business model for starting up new projects by not doing an ICO, instead they are making weekly airdrops and listing the coin in a couple of exchanges for the early birds. I like this way very much.

[Aptekary]

Yeah, sometimes it is really necessary but sometimes really unnecessary. Also there is a new business model for starting up new projects by not doing an ICO, instead they are making weekly airdrops and listing the coin in a couple of exchanges for the early birds. I like this way very much.

The fact is that there are a lot of interesting and promising projects on the ico market. Coins on the crypto-currency market are also quite a lot, which does not represent any interest for investors. But meanwhile there are a lot of promising and necessary projects.

[dewildance]

I don't call it necessary. But it is the good thing. It is helping all market development and grow. Coinmarketcap has already reached over 2K+ cryptocurrencies now. So market value is getting increase day by day with new coins/tokens. Some day natural selection will select some of it and money will be transferred the good ones.

[Faeton]

Yes, ICO projects are very necessary for the development and improvement of the crypto currency. Everyone who wants to contribute to the development of the Crypto-currency is allowed to conduct the ICO. Now, of course, there are a lot of scammers involved in this process, but at this stage from now on we will not go anywhere. Too large amounts of money that ICO teams collect collect and attract the attention of scammers. When the states begin to regulate the ICO process, which in any case will be, the number of fraudulent ICO projects will significantly decrease.

[byteminr]

I think ICO will change soon.
This is already happening. I think that now there are a lot less frivolus investors

[mrkavasaki]

Yeah, sometimes it is really necessary but sometimes really unnecessary. Also there is a new business model for starting up new projects by not doing an ICO, instead they are making weekly airdrops and listing the coin in a couple of exchanges for the early birds. I like this way very much.

That is, you find non-creative ICOs, blockchain will be futuristic and at present there are many companies and corporations are applying it to their work. ICOs are just projects that help speed things up

[hisuka]

I think ICO will change soon.
This is already happening. I think that now there are a lot less frivolus investors

Yes Ico must be changed, since we all know Ico’s has surrounds of scam. These must be change indeed for the benefits of the users or investors. Although, Ico’s is also important to collect funds on their project but needs to changes the process to prevent fraud.

[Dessy88]

Irrespective of problems encountered by crypto enthusiasts like fake icos, scammers and delay. I think ICO plays an important rule in execution of sound projects. So Without ICO, most coins  find it difficult to raise funds to execute their project. Without ICO, coins or projects will find it difficult to advertise their project, without  ICO, projects will find it difficult to reach the right audience, Etc.therefore I believe in ICO because it enable me to research, analyst and evaluate the potentials of that project. Do you also believe in ICO?

I also feel that way and I also believe ICO even though it cannot be denied that there are not a few ico who are just scams and scams but ico is very helpful in the project

[ttking]

I think that ICO is the best chance to get money easily, sure that it is not the 100% safe thing to deal with as risks are everywhere. To my mind, it is necessary to check whether ico is reliable

[sinta23]

I think ICO will change soon.
This is already happening. I think that now there are a lot less frivolus investors

Yes Ico must be changed, since we all know Ico’s has surrounds of scam. These must be change indeed for the benefits of the users or investors. Although, Ico’s is also important to collect funds on their project but needs to changes the process to prevent fraud.

we know that at the moment the development of ico is surrounded by fraud. so I think that the ICO should be changed, so that in the future it can soar, and the possibility of investors' interest will rise again, because the ICO has been changed.

[judeafante]

I do believe in ICO because we have seen in so many projects the fruit of having an ICO we have a lot of good projects and platform online, but unfortunately, it is being ruined by bad projects and developers who neglected their project after getting funds from the investors, ICO has never been the same since two years ago.

[Conte_Forni]

I completely agree with you. I think that ICO is very important for cryptography in general and I think we've already seen a lot of good Crypto-currencies that have proved that ICO is an integral part of their advancement and I think so and everything will remain in place!

[LucaBlight]

Of course it is use to raise funds , for me I am investing to existing company that are adopting blockchain company because it is more safer doing this , because most of the ICO Project nowadays are scams which is bad for new investors ! If you are looking for decent ICO i prefer WPP Energy that is established in Switzerland , the company is one of the leading renewable energy provider worldwide , they are also adopting blockchain technology to operate more efficient and also to incentivize the use of clean energy !

[Mandevil]

I agree - that the projects .. this is part of the industry itself crit. therefore it can not be at all without it, respectively, the ICO and the crypto currency are one whole. if there is no ICO there will be no crypts,,,,

[Mandevil]

I also think that this is necessary for the further growth of the entire industry, not only in general, but also in its application to life. ie for ordinary people.

[robertsu]

Of course ICO - it's a good variant  make up a purse. Startups  or any another projects which have relation with cryptocurrency IPO can't hold, due to the specifics of the niche.