Did you think ICO is necessary?

[Mandevil]

ICO is very necessary in my own point of view, It helps startups to raised fund for their project. Although there is too much scam in companies pretending to be real whereas they are scammers. I will also like if ICO companies are registered with the government of  their residential office.

Yes, it would be nice to have some kind of registry - to control the powerheads. Here not only ordinary people suffer. but the entire crypto world, because of a lack of trust in the industry in general

[brjameng]

ICO is mostly needed by many project, since it's most of the project that needed to have some fund to be used for any future development.

[sanasara]

Yeah ICO is very important because it is like advertising the coin and easy way to make their coins popular and reach to the right level .people could easily find coins through icos without icos the price of coin cannot be easily up so I think it is necessary for all introducing coins.

[5hoop5]

ICO is an interesting investment opportunity for investing fiat money and crypto currency. This investment opportunity is potentially able to circumvent the profitability of traditional financial instruments.

[Gurjasmeet]

Yes of course ico is most important play the  role to grow up any projects. because without ico can't reach the peak point of success. advertising is must be given power of strength etc.it can not possible without ico .so l think it's necessary to do it.

[goolesby]

I think yes. ICO is still very necessary for helping the crypto especially new crypto to have community, promote their project, and spread the tokens or coins. ICO is the Initial Coin Offering where it is very helpful to gain the investors to invest their money and then the tokens and coins from the ICO can exactly run on exchange. However, it may be sad to know many ICO scams that make investors lose their money.

[lihongjing]

Irrespective of problems encountered by crypto enthusiasts like fake icos, scammers and delay. I think ICO plays an important rule in execution of sound projects. So Without ICO, most coins  find it difficult to raise funds to execute their project. Without ICO, coins or projects will find it difficult to advertise their project, without  ICO, projects will find it difficult to reach the right audience, Etc.therefore I believe in ICO because it enable me to research, analyst and evaluate the potentials of that project. Do you also believe in ICO?

ICO is a very convenient way to finance, and now companies and teams can quickly get R&D funding through ICO to contribute to society as a whole. Just because these fraudsters use the current ICO to extract their profits, this has caused ICO's reputation to suffer. As long as there is a complete system to standardize ICO, I believe that is the time when the ICO broke out.

[dmamigo]

I think it does, if the project is of great value then ICO can benefit both the dev as well as the investors. As of now, many ICOs are scamming recently, so it's important for us to be aware and cautious before investing. And not all ICOs are fake, fraudulent so don't stop believing in ICO, because it is a great option to have to know the company and invest in them.

[teosanru]

Your statement makes absolutely ZERO SENSE. Why isn't ICO necessary? How else do you expect a coin to have publicity? How will millions of people out there would know of a coin's existence if the ICO had never taken place?
Promotions matter a lot, and without promotions, we wouldn't have known about 99% of the coins that exist here.

[Maestro75]

I think ICO is important because apart from it being another method startup companies can raise money, it is the same as what companies do in stocks as IPO. The only problem with ICO is that it has become very easy for fraudsters to cheat people out of their monies through this ICO. That is the major problem now.

[waser12]

What do you mean under "believe in ICO". Of course ICO plays important role in project development. To find sponsorship is quite difficult.

[Donggou]

ICO is very important. ICO is an equal investment in the world, that is, the reform of the financial industry. But abuse ICO, scam. Still fatal.

[Lorence.xD]

The disappearance of the ICO is a very serious loss to the cryptocurrency, as is the world economy. But ICO needs to be regulated. Good ICO development is the welfare of all mankind.

      Yes, i believe in ICO of every product. Market is more bigger if the product is posted for ICO in the open market. it is a plat form where you can attract more possible investors thru advertisement, project endorsement using the Bounty Campaign. Yes, it is also thru that a lot of ICO as posted are created by a lot of Scammer for project profits then just disappeared on the thread, with this one should be more careful in participating ICO  Campaign.

[Manuel05]

Of course i do believe in ICOs, how else do you expect good projects to get funded. I know they can be self funded but the point is to get as much peoppe involved in the project financial because free airdrops doesnt mean the people getting the airdrops believe in the project.
As for me, when i invest in any ICO i truly believe the project will do great or have a great fighting chance in the market. Yeah about the Scams, i feel its normal one just have to be extra careful when doing discovery.  I believe ICOs are necessary.

[Sadyshagg]

I'm not against ICO's in theory, because I believe a proper, structured fund raising solution in cooperation with blockchain technology is what the future holds for small to large size businesses.

[iASIC]

Irrespective of problems encountered by crypto enthusiasts like fake icos, scammers and delay. I think ICO plays an important rule in execution of sound projects. So Without ICO, most coins  find it difficult to raise funds to execute their project. Without ICO, coins or projects will find it difficult to advertise their project, without  ICO, projects will find it difficult to reach the right audience, Etc.therefore I believe in ICO because it enable me to research, analyst and evaluate the potentials of that project. Do you also believe in ICO?

ICO is really needed for the present moment. Because now the market is bottoming out and it gives us more opportunities to grow better when the market rises. Although quality projects are not that great, I still believe in ICO projects in the future. Still waiting for a good project to be able to x3 properties.

[vavan37]

I think that ICO is needed. But there must be a structure that would control them. Precisely because there is no control there are so many scammers who want only to raise money. In general, without ICO, new projects will not be able to realize themselves

[maianh09]

ICOs are not a necessity, but it is a way to attract investors as well as find new working capital flows for the Crypto market. Most ICOs often fail and cause investors to lose money, but losses make the market more liquid to help stabilize the market.

[thefoex]

ICOs are not a necessity, but it is a way to attract investors as well as find new working capital flows for the Crypto market. Most ICOs often fail and cause investors to lose money, but losses make the market more liquid to help stabilize the market.

I think the ICO is needed for the purpose of introducing a new project, regardless of whether the project failed or succeeded. and ICOs are also needed for developers to get initial funds that will be used for development.

[tins]

Although many argue that the ICO market has died, however, the figures show the opposite, the ICO market is growing, in August 1818 $ 1.4 billion is called capital figure ICO, up 44% over the previous month. If it is not needed, why is it always growing