Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 10:41:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 109 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest  (Read 181792 times)
kynhongchua
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 10:13:36 AM
 #481

https://i.imgur.com/n7ttyl3.png

Suqa order books are now active at Injex.io!
Suqa's decision to be listed was successful, we have now opened the order books for trading!
Suqa has 1 active pair - SUQA_BTC

Trade here: Injex Market  - SUQA_BTC
We did not approve this exchange and they even did not bother to ask us if we want them or not.
Please play safe and wait for our announcements.
As we said earlier that  we will be on the exchanges only on the first week of November so until that time we will not get listed on any Exchange that does not contact us first even if they have good volume.
We will not get listed without being ready.

Thanks

SUQA Foundation

We actually did message you and you never replied, yet members on our discord asked us to list so we did.

I don't see why having a service listing your currency is bad for it in anyway?

Injex.io they are scammers, you stay away from it. I lost 0.013978btc when sent to Injex.io to buy suqa. After I bought suqa they deleted all of them from my account
https://uphinhnhanh.com/images/2018/10/16/history10d234.png
1710844890
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710844890

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710844890
Reply with quote  #2

1710844890
Report to moderator
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710844890
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710844890

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710844890
Reply with quote  #2

1710844890
Report to moderator
anhong
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 11:24:59 AM
 #482

I was checking on the Suqa website. It has officially doubled since 24-hours ago. Now at 114Gh/s. It was 72 yesterday

It's growing like crazy, unbelievable. but on the other hand it's good. So people believe in this coin which makes it valuable.
Newminer2018
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0

Just mining for fun


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 11:54:37 AM
 #483

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.
JayDiCee
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 11:55:22 AM
 #484

I was checking on the Suqa website. It has officially doubled since 24-hours ago. Now at 114Gh/s. It was 72 yesterday

It's growing like crazy, unbelievable. but on the other hand it's good. So people believe in this coin which makes it valuable.

I am curious to see what the Net Hash will look like when the DEVs anounce the SUQA Community Bounties 1 Million SUQA on 25 October 2018. And how many new miners will join from then.
Newminer2018
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0

Just mining for fun


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 12:08:32 PM
 #485

I was checking on the Suqa website. It has officially doubled since 24-hours ago. Now at 114Gh/s. It was 72 yesterday

It's growing like crazy, unbelievable. but on the other hand it's good. So people believe in this coin which makes it valuable.

I am curious to see what the Net Hash will look like when the DEVs anounce the SUQA Community Bounties 1 Million SUQA on 25 October 2018. And how many new miners will join from then.

I believe in this coin and will be holding and making deposits. How does this bounty work for those that are mining?
JayDiCee
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 12:28:46 PM
 #486

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start
SUQAFOUNDATION (OP)
Copper Member
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 12:43:20 PM
 #487

List of SUQA mining pools with live stats & hashrate distribution

https://miningpoolstats.stream/suqa

Only 3 pools seems active

You can find info from the pools here.
https://poolexplorer.com/coin/5401
Newminer2018
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0

Just mining for fun


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 01:33:44 PM
 #488

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.
toogoody
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 03:00:19 PM
 #489

List of SUQA mining pools with live stats & hashrate distribution

https://miningpoolstats.stream/suqa

Only 3 pools seems active

You can find info from the pools here.
https://poolexplorer.com/coin/5401

You can find info but you can't sort the list, can't see fees or pools hashrate history.
finder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 03:02:37 PM
 #490

21 stat Grin Grin
anhong
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 03:09:08 PM
 #491

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
anhong
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 03:16:28 PM
 #492

Anyone tried solo mining?

I did the first couple days, but it was never so good as in the pool.
Don't know if I did something wrong? but in the beginning I should had enough hashrate, but now it's almost impossible. Gues you need to have at least 500-700 MH/s to solo mine.
Newminer2018
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0

Just mining for fun


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 03:52:11 PM
 #493

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
Can you tell me why my 1070 rig is outputting 26.5 Mh/s on average, but the
with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
I am still making adjustments and thanks for the info.

Can you explain why my 1070 rig is running around 26.5 Mh/s, but on the pool it is saying 12.6 Mh/s. Very weird as my other mixed card rig is steady at 27 M/hs and the pool is around 25 Mh/s?
anhong
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 03:56:34 PM
Last edit: October 16, 2018, 04:32:51 PM by anhong
 #494

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start


Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
Can you tell me why my 1070 rig is outputting 26.5 Mh/s on average, but the
with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
I am still making adjustments and thanks for the info.

Can you explain why my 1070 rig is running around 26.5 Mh/s, but on the pool it is saying 12.6 Mh/s. Very weird as my other mixed card rig is steady at 27 M/hs and the pool is around 25 Mh/s?


which Pool you at?

If I check pool stats it's almost never the same as the stats on your RIG, probably some delay and sometimes it's even higher then your rig informs you.
Think has also to do with difficulty what hashrate it runs.
If I check my RIG 9x1070 it runs on my rigs it says around 40MH/s but at pool it's 32Mh/s and sometimes it's the opposite way, it's higher then 40MH/s. But my RIG is always pretty constant on 40/Mh/s.

and most pools have a delay between 5min-30min.
rainbowminer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 2


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2018, 04:07:19 PM
 #495

Anyone tried solo mining?

I did the first couple days, but it was never so good as in the pool.
Don't know if I did something wrong? but in the beginning I should had enough hashrate, but now it's almost impossible. Gues you need to have at least 500-700 MH/s to solo mine.

IMHO, the network hashrate is already too high for solo mining. For a 30MH/s rig, you would have an average of 6 to 8 days working time, for one block to be found. And only, if the network hashrate would stay constant.

RBM


~ https://rbminer.net Rainbowminer profit switching multipool mining Nvidia, AMD, CPU ~

RainbowMiner developer https://rbminer.net
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050211.0
anhong
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 04:15:23 PM
 #496

Anyone tried solo mining?

I did the first couple days, but it was never so good as in the pool.
Don't know if I did something wrong? but in the beginning I should had enough hashrate, but now it's almost impossible. Gues you need to have at least 500-700 MH/s to solo mine.

IMHO, the network hashrate is already too high for solo mining. For a 30MH/s rig, you would have an average of 6 to 8 days working time, for one block to be found. And only, if the network hashrate would stay constant.

RBM


~ https://rbminer.net Rainbowminer profit switching multipool mining Nvidia, AMD, CPU ~

yeah true, but just one week ago it nework hashrate was around 20GH and now allready over 100
szafek
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 11


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2018, 04:27:28 PM
 #497

https://www.probitex.com/trade/index/market/suqa_btc.html

Sonata.ai   ●●   The only cryptocurrency exchange you will ever need
──────────      │█│     JOIN WHITELIST     │█│      ──────────
WHITEPAPER   ●   FACEBOOK   ●   TWITTER   ●   LINKEDIN   ●   TELEGRAM   ●   MEDIUM   ●   ANN THREAD
minermaxmax
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 04:33:37 PM
 #498

Scam?
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1042
Merit: 328


SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 05:07:36 PM
 #499

Here are the overclocking settings of single GTX1070:
GPU model: Gigabyte Extreme Gaming GTX1070, OS Win10 x64
Average power consumption is about 130W

BTC   Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System   BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
Newminer2018
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0

Just mining for fun


View Profile
October 16, 2018, 05:19:19 PM
 #500

with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
Can you tell me why my 1070 rig is outputting 26.5 Mh/s on average, but the
with zjazz CUDA miner I've got the follwoing results for Pascal cards:

GTX1070      4.8-5.1 Mh/s
GTX1080      5.9-6.1 Mh/s
GTX1080ti    7.8-8.3 Mh/s
And power consumption significant lower than the most other algos

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

That is awesome. What are your setting on these cards. Would be interesting as I am running 6 x GTX 1070 on one rig, 1 x GTX 1080, 2 x GTX 1070, 2 x GTX 1070ti and a GTX 1060. Averaging about 27 Mh/s per rig.

I have my Asus 1070 running at Core +200 Mem +600 at 75% TDP and get about 4600MHs. zjazz DEV noted somewhere that Core +100 Mem +400 and TDP of 60% is good to start

Thats pretty good. I tried your configuration on my rig with the 6 x Gigabyte 1070's and it crapped out. The best I can get is Core voltage +65, Power Limit +65, Core Clock +90 running 1683 MHZ - 1847 MHZ, and the Mem Clock +602. This gave me a steady 4500 Kh/s per card. temperature around 41 - 50 degrees.

as soon as i start overclocking GPU's the mining software crashes. I got rigs with 1070, 1070TI, 1080 and 1080TI cards. I even needed  to underclock my 1080TI's memory -200 just to get it stable. Now it's 36hours without any problems.
1070 = 4500-4650 kh/s
1070TI = 4800-5100 kh/s
1080 = 6100-6200 kh/s
1080TI = 6700- 7600 kh/s

funny thing is that i got several 1080TI cards which gives so much difference in hashrate.
But i think it has to with my PSU's. I got 1 Rig with 7x1080TI running total on +/- 55 Mh/s and 1 rig with 10x1080TI and runs on +/- 70MH/s.
Huge difference if you ask me. But took me 4-5 days before i could get 10card rig stable. But my guts say there is something with one of my PSU's.
I am still making adjustments and thanks for the info.

Can you explain why my 1070 rig is running around 26.5 Mh/s, but on the pool it is saying 12.6 Mh/s. Very weird as my other mixed card rig is steady at 27 M/hs and the pool is around 25 Mh/s?


which Pool you at?

If I check pool stats it's almost never the same as the stats on your RIG, probably some delay and sometimes it's even higher then your rig informs you.
Think has also to do with difficulty what hashrate it runs.
If I check my RIG 9x1070 it runs on my rigs it says around 40MH/s but at pool it's 32Mh/s and sometimes it's the opposite way, it's higher then 40MH/s. But my RIG is always pretty constant on 40/Mh/s.

and most pools have a delay between 5min-30min.

I am on bsod.pw. was om Yiimp, but as more miners left, the number blocks found decreased. Again, many thanks for your help.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 109 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!