people fail to understand security through obscurity is no security at all.
many of the aur boosters itt are so afraid their coin will fail they aim to quash ANY discussion that might put their currency of the week in a bad light, rather than fixing the problems and addressing the fundamental flaws in their currency strategy.
Your statement is true, but wouldn't it be more logical if BCX just be "out in the open about it" for real? I mean. If answer A to the question asked by Colinstheman is the only truthful one, shouldn't BCX be really open about his findings and contribute to the improvement of the security
yes! That's the purpose of this thread. you're aware of the stress test because of this thread, and BCX didn't keep it a secret. some people (nite69, boristhespider) are taking this thread for good use, and are discussing solutions ITT. However, you, s1gs3gv, and a few others are trolling this thread, and are actively trying to suppress anyone disagreeing with the auroracoin party line.
By spending your energy criticizing BCX you solve none of the problems with the coin design, the airdrop, and the poor network hashrate of auroracoin.
take your own advice, and allow people to discuss improvements to security, rather than attacking the messenger and attempting to stop discussion of problems with auroracoin.
rather than ranting about how he will prove how he is so good in destroying "an entire nations coin" ??
please show us where the nation of iceland has officially accepted this coin as their national currency. Without this, you and the Panamanian developer are essentially imposing your financial will on a sovereign nation.
It's like Putin bombing the hell out of the Ukraine and saying "hey, I told you I could do it, stop wining!"
so where would mining a blockchain equate to bombing and killing civilians? hell of a strawman you're constructing here.
