Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 04:21:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 [140] 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 ... 298 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast  (Read 542198 times)
gpuminer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:02:48 AM
 #2781

Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.

i got error running it. It says fail to init GPU thread 0. Disable device 0  Error -11. Compilation fail.

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!. Sw4sYCL3h9NjLu1i9d6YSSsuQZQztFR7jW
1715228479
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715228479

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715228479
Reply with quote  #2

1715228479
Report to moderator
1715228479
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715228479

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715228479
Reply with quote  #2

1715228479
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
itsik78
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:07:54 AM
 #2782

Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.
Thanks!
Beta gave me 8.5 MH/s (R290) and the new version with the same settings give me 3.7 MH/s
Any idea why?

Intensity 10, Engine 1100, Memory stuck at 150 and can't be changed (not on keccak, current version or beta so I guess it's fine).

I can see that the card isn't really having a hard time Smiley It's temp is on less than 70 while on the previous version it was always above 70.
Oh well, back to mining SocialCoin Smiley

Thanks
zhpool
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:29:56 AM
 #2783

USE http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/
it WORKS!!!!!  and need more miners to find blocks faster.
Heavycoinpol obviously have some problem because even with 4x hash pover there was no block since last night.
change to ZHPOOL to help and more importantly to get paid!

I've also moved to ZHPOOL, to help with decentralizing from 1GH.

I'd suggest switching to nonce-pool instead if you must, others have proved their incompetence.

assume you are referring the instability during keccak512's stratum-mining beta testing, that's normal.

We devote our servers and efforts for HeavyCoin community before everything get stable, and all services are now announced final stable by heeavycoin developer, I may suggest you take a shot;) at the http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/ running mining and payout services by HeavyCoin developer.

YAdaminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 829
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:40:09 AM
 #2784

Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.

i got error running it. It says fail to init GPU thread 0. Disable device 0  Error -11. Compilation fail.

I have the same problem. Back to beta :-)
gpools
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:45:37 AM
 #2785

many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate
massiveman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:50:20 AM
 #2786


OK...  time to get your act together (vote smart, sit on hands, etc.)...  if we don't see $0.30 soon...  I'm gonna smack you people!!!    Kiss

yeah this coin seems to be very stable price wise and judging by the buy orders isn't gonna go down any time soon so the only way is up.
dusan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:52:08 AM
Last edit: March 19, 2014, 11:05:22 AM by dusan
 #2787

hi all, anybody can help me with this problem i am new to mining:
i have radeon 5600 and cgminer 3.7.3

 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19
 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19
 [11:30:33] Started cgminer 3.7.3
 [11:30:35] Probing for an alive pool
 [11:30:36] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122
 [11:31:34] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [11:31:34] Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!

 [11:31:34] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
 [11:31:34] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
 [11:31:34] Try restarting cgminer.
Press enter to continue:

thank you very much

additional info
 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19
 [11:30:33] Started cgminer 3.7.3
 [11:30:35] Probing for an alive pool
 [11:30:36] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122
 [11:31:34] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [11:31:34] Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!

 [11:31:34] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
 [11:31:34] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
 [11:31:34] Try restarting cgminer.
Press enter to continue:
vandokkum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:56:30 AM
 #2788

When gpu kicked in, I thought this coin will be dead.
It seems I'm wrong!  Ok, I'm mining and holding it.

111111111
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:57:10 AM
Last edit: March 19, 2014, 12:26:33 PM by TheRealSteve
 #2789

many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate
pool
rate (Mh/s)
miners
Mh/s/miner
pool fee (%)
payout
http://hvc.1gh.com/
17,646.22
1327
13.3
1
RBPPS
http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/
1,575.23
160
9.85
1
PPLNS
https://heavycoinpool.com/
379.38
116
3.27
1
PROP
http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/
166.70
28
5.95
1
PPLNS
http://heavy.stablehash.com/
0.01
1
0.01
1
PROP
https://hvc.crunchharder.net/
0.00
0
0
2
PPLNS
http://hvc.pool.mn/
0.00
0
0
0
site broken
* miner count for 1gh is an estimate based on total hash rate (T), summed top 100 (Sc) hash rate (Sh), extrapolation of miners 81-100 progression through to 1Mh/s (Xh, Xc) dividing the remainder (T-Sh-Xh) by 1Mh/s (Rc) and summing these 3 results together (Sc+Xc+Rc), and is likely wildly inaccurate

( Updated 1pm CET )


keccak512 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 10:57:27 AM
 #2790

many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate

Well done!

We strongly encourage more people to use pools other than 1GH (eg. heavycoinpool.com, heavy.stablehash.com and hvc.nonce-pool.com) as it is important for decentralization.

We will soon offer some additional bounties to the pools, which must be given away to pool members proportional to their shares.  This will help "boostrap" the pools by allowing them to reward pool members until they build up enough hash rate and solve more blocks.  Hopefully this will help.
deamon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100

yes!?


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:00:07 AM
 #2791


+1

this info is great, thanks

TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:01:29 AM
 #2792

this info is great, thanks

HeavyCoin guys should add that info (realtime) to their page.  I was going to add number of miners, but 1gh doesn't seem to publish that information.  Can't even make a guesstimate based on top 100 Smiley

mfqrs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:05:19 AM
 #2793

hi all, anybody can help me with this problem i am new to mining:
i have radeon 5600 and cgminer 3.7.3

 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19
 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19
 [11:30:33] Started cgminer 3.7.3
 [11:30:35] Probing for an alive pool
 [11:30:36] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122
 [11:31:34] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [11:31:34] Error compiling program for search.
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Creating kernel search failed!

 [11:31:34] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
 [11:31:34] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
 [11:31:34] Try restarting cgminer.
Press enter to continue:

thank you very much

Same for me, tryed on R9 270, R9 270x, R9 280x and R9 290...
deamon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100

yes!?


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:07:47 AM
 #2794

1gh need shutdown for a while, let hashs turn into other pools/
Too drastic. But if 1gh were to start raising their fees, that might do the trick.


that means, we all have regulations that "never" should be in the cryptocurrencies i think

Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 255


SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:26:29 AM
 #2795

Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.

The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.

I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.

Of course, that's just me ...

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██▀       ▀█       ▀████████████        ▀█         █▀       ▀██
██   ▀██▄▄▄█   ██   ████████████   ███   ████   ████   ▀██▄▄▄██
███▄     ▀██       ▄████████████       ▄█████   █████▄     ▀███
██▀▀▀██▄   █   █████████████████   █▄  ▀█████   ████▀▀▀██▄   ██
██▄       ▄█   █████████████████   ██▄  ▀████   ████▄       ▄██
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██       ██▀      ▀█████████████    ▀██   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▄██▄   ████████████     ▀█   █████████████████████
████   ███   ████████   ████   █   ▄  ▀   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▀██▀   █   ████   █   █▄     █████████████████████
██       ██▄      ▄███        ██   ██▄    █████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████                                                             ████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
.
.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████          ████████████████                                 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
►►  Powered by
BOUNTY
DETECTIVE
Fermin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:33:24 AM
 #2796

Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.

The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.

I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.

Of course, that's just me ...

Yeah, that's fucking true, too many registrations in 993257 pools!
zhpool
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 11:41:51 AM
 #2797

Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.

The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.

I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.

Of course, that's just me ...

Yeah, that's fucking true, too many registrations in 993257 pools!

+1

kuperis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 357
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 19, 2014, 01:10:43 PM
 #2798

volume down, but most sell orders is 0.0x btc, buy orders bigger... interested when i gonna be push up....
massiveman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 01:51:27 PM
 #2799

some retard just dumped hard into that buy wall
uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 505


View Profile
March 19, 2014, 01:53:51 PM
 #2800

Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.

The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.

I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.

Of course, that's just me ...

Yeah, that's fucking true, too many registrations in 993257 pools!

+1

yup, im avoiding using MPOS pool, they are crap
Pages: « 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 [140] 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 ... 298 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!