gpuminer
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:02:48 AM |
|
Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.i got error running it. It says fail to init GPU thread 0. Disable device 0 Error -11. Compilation fail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
itsik78
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:07:54 AM |
|
Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.Thanks! Beta gave me 8.5 MH/s (R290) and the new version with the same settings give me 3.7 MH/s Any idea why? Intensity 10, Engine 1100, Memory stuck at 150 and can't be changed (not on keccak, current version or beta so I guess it's fine). I can see that the card isn't really having a hard time It's temp is on less than 70 while on the previous version it was always above 70. Oh well, back to mining SocialCoin Thanks
|
|
|
|
zhpool
Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:29:56 AM |
|
USE http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/it WORKS!!!!! and need more miners to find blocks faster. Heavycoinpol obviously have some problem because even with 4x hash pover there was no block since last night. change to ZHPOOL to help and more importantly to get paid! I've also moved to ZHPOOL, to help with decentralizing from 1GH. I'd suggest switching to nonce-pool instead if you must, others have proved their incompetence. assume you are referring the instability during keccak512's stratum-mining beta testing, that's normal. We devote our servers and efforts for HeavyCoin community before everything get stable, and all services are now announced final stable by heeavycoin developer, I may suggest you take a shot;) at the http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/ running mining and payout services by HeavyCoin developer.
|
|
|
|
YAdaminer
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:40:09 AM |
|
Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.i got error running it. It says fail to init GPU thread 0. Disable device 0 Error -11. Compilation fail. I have the same problem. Back to beta :-)
|
|
|
|
gpools
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:45:37 AM |
|
many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate
|
|
|
|
massiveman
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:50:20 AM |
|
OK... time to get your act together (vote smart, sit on hands, etc.)... if we don't see $0.30 soon... I'm gonna smack you people!!! yeah this coin seems to be very stable price wise and judging by the buy orders isn't gonna go down any time soon so the only way is up.
|
|
|
|
dusan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:52:08 AM Last edit: March 19, 2014, 11:05:22 AM by dusan |
|
hi all, anybody can help me with this problem i am new to mining: i have radeon 5600 and cgminer 3.7.3
[11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19 [11:30:33] Started cgminer 3.7.3 [11:30:35] Probing for an alive pool [11:30:36] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122 [11:31:34] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [11:31:34] Error compiling program for search. Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Creating kernel search failed!
[11:31:34] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0 [11:31:34] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this. [11:31:34] Try restarting cgminer. Press enter to continue:
thank you very much
additional info [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19 [11:30:33] Started cgminer 3.7.3 [11:30:35] Probing for an alive pool [11:30:36] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122 [11:31:34] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [11:31:34] Error compiling program for search. Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Creating kernel search failed!
[11:31:34] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0 [11:31:34] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this. [11:31:34] Try restarting cgminer. Press enter to continue:
|
|
|
|
vandokkum
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:56:30 AM |
|
When gpu kicked in, I thought this coin will be dead. It seems I'm wrong! Ok, I'm mining and holding it.
|
111111111
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:57:10 AM Last edit: March 19, 2014, 12:26:33 PM by TheRealSteve |
|
many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate
* miner count for 1gh is an estimate based on total hash rate (T), summed top 100 (Sc) hash rate (Sh), extrapolation of miners 81-100 progression through to 1Mh/s (Xh, Xc) dividing the remainder (T-Sh-Xh) by 1Mh/s (Rc) and summing these 3 results together (Sc+Xc+Rc), and is likely wildly inaccurate( Updated 1pm CET )
|
|
|
|
keccak512 (OP)
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:57:27 AM |
|
many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate
Well done! We strongly encourage more people to use pools other than 1GH (eg. heavycoinpool.com, heavy.stablehash.com and hvc.nonce-pool.com) as it is important for decentralization. We will soon offer some additional bounties to the pools, which must be given away to pool members proportional to their shares. This will help "boostrap" the pools by allowing them to reward pool members until they build up enough hash rate and solve more blocks. Hopefully this will help.
|
|
|
|
deamon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
yes!?
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:00:07 AM |
|
many pp don't like all hashrate on 1gh. I'm switch to hvc.nonce-pool.com 1GH hashrate
+1 this info is great, thanks
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:01:29 AM |
|
this info is great, thanks
HeavyCoin guys should add that info (realtime) to their page. I was going to add number of miners, but 1gh doesn't seem to publish that information. Can't even make a guesstimate based on top 100
|
|
|
|
mfqrs3
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:05:19 AM |
|
hi all, anybody can help me with this problem i am new to mining: i have radeon 5600 and cgminer 3.7.3
[11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19 [11:30:33] Log date is now 2014-03-19 [11:30:33] Started cgminer 3.7.3 [11:30:35] Probing for an alive pool [11:30:36] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.000122 [11:31:34] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [11:31:34] Error compiling program for search. Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Creating kernel search failed!
[11:31:34] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0 [11:31:34] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this. [11:31:34] Try restarting cgminer. Press enter to continue:
thank you very much
Same for me, tryed on R9 270, R9 270x, R9 280x and R9 290...
|
|
|
|
deamon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
yes!?
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:07:47 AM |
|
1gh need shutdown for a while, let hashs turn into other pools/
Too drastic. But if 1gh were to start raising their fees, that might do the trick. that means, we all have regulations that "never" should be in the cryptocurrencies i think
|
|
|
|
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:26:29 AM |
|
Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.
The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.
I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.
Of course, that's just me ...
|
|
|
|
Fermin
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:33:24 AM |
|
Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.
The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.
I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.
Of course, that's just me ...
Yeah, that's fucking true, too many registrations in 993257 pools!
|
|
|
|
zhpool
Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:41:51 AM |
|
Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.
The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.
I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.
Of course, that's just me ...
Yeah, that's fucking true, too many registrations in 993257 pools! +1
|
|
|
|
kuperis
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:10:43 PM |
|
volume down, but most sell orders is 0.0x btc, buy orders bigger... interested when i gonna be push up....
|
|
|
|
massiveman
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:51:27 PM |
|
some retard just dumped hard into that buy wall
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:53:51 PM |
|
Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.
The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.
I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.
Of course, that's just me ...
Yeah, that's fucking true, too many registrations in 993257 pools! +1 yup, im avoiding using MPOS pool, they are crap
|
|
|
|
|