Safe Bounty hunters

[rachman mahesa]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

I also agree if it is indeed to reduce scammers, but I only ask to facilitate the process of Kyc. so far the process of the Kyc is too difficult to pass. I think just uploading emails, IDs and photos is enough to prove.

There is an easy way to do KYC and some are very difficult. Usually what I think about doing KYC is if it's not comparable we get from the token. If there is little and no price, it is better not to do KYC. What's more filling KYC is very difficult.

[rijaljun]

It's no need to save bounty hunters from scam projects actually, but investors. Most of bounty hunters dont invest, dont put their money at risks. They probably just waste time for scam project. But investors, they put money on a risky place, probably the money they invest is the last they have. Forum can't do anything to say scam or not scam, but we can. that's why we need to help investors to get a good project, dont let them fall for scam project.

[kipoel]

Perhaps it already been mentioned before, in my opinion would be for us to keep on informed.
What i mean is, we need to be active to gain information as much as possible, so we could avoid to get scammed, since that is our own personal responsibilities to find any trusted project/bounty.

[Natalim]

Perhaps it already been mentioned before, in my opinion would be for us to keep on informed.
What i mean is, we need to be active to gain information as much as possible, so we could avoid to get scammed, since that is our own personal responsibilities to find any trusted project/bounty.

That's our responsibility as a bounty hunters, we have to be active and monitor the project we are promoting .
It's not wise to still continue to work when the project is not gaining some investment from the people, they might not declared as scam but when there are no investors interested to invest, most likely it will not be successful and your reward will have on future as well.

[jademaxsuy]

It's no need to save bounty hunters from scam projects actually, but investors. Most of bounty hunters dont invest, dont put their money at risks. They probably just waste time for scam project. But investors, they put money on a risky place, probably the money they invest is the last they have. Forum can't do anything to say scam or not scam, but we can. that's why we need to help investors to get a good project, dont let them fall for scam project.

Bounty hunters does not invest money but time and effort to promote a project and become successful. However, many are not seeing the importance of bounty hunters. The project will not succeed if it will not because of the bounty hunters. I guess that it is not the fault of bounty hunters if an investors get scam. In the end it is still the investors to do the diligence before investing in a project.

[Barabulya]

I think that at the moment there is no need for kyc and strict control of the participants. These measures may be relevant a year ago, when many projects in need of advertising rushed to the market.

[Henrobakkara]

I think the moderator will not examine every project that comes and they don't have much time to do research and for that we have to do our own research to avoid scammers and not work in vain

[UnDerDoG81]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

I also agree if it is indeed to reduce scammers, but I only ask to facilitate the process of Kyc. so far the process of the Kyc is too difficult to pass. I think just uploading emails, IDs and photos is enough to prove.

There is an easy way to do KYC and some are very difficult. Usually what I think about doing KYC is if it's not comparable we get from the token. If there is little and no price, it is better not to do KYC. What's more filling KYC is very difficult.

KYC currently thinks it is not too difficult, unless they require a utility bill. But I think KYC is only suitable for individuals involved in buying ICO, but for bounty hunter it is not necessary.

[Destroyeroff98]

I think that it is enough in the bounty thread to inform in advance whether KYC is needed. After this information, the participant will be able to decide for himself whether this campaign is in a bounty or not.
But I support the idea about the moderator.

[Script]

Bitcointalk cannot be held liable for fraudulent ICOs. Headhunters have to choose their own projects. But if there was a tool for screening out explicit fraudsters, it would be very good.

[bastian466]

I think KYC need to be not only for bounty hunters but for team who makes ICO, it too much scam projects last time, all dissapointed in any ICO or bounty

The good suggestion is to make balance, the hunter becomes aware of personal data from each member of the project developer if they commit fraud there must be a little fear because their identity is known by all participants

[Vishnu.Reang]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

Scammers are very innovative nowadays and the moderators will find it extremely difficult to identify the fake projects. There is only one reliable method to stop these scams. It should be made mandatory that the promoters should keep a certain amount in escrow before they can create an ANN thread here. But whenever such a measure is proposed, it attracts opposition from a lot of people.

[Wingzcrypto2018]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

This is the bad side I think of crypto, which is there's an ico project arise here in this industry to scam others. And I guess We can't avoid it, its part of the any business industry. That's why We as a bounty hunters need to be careful in choosing ICO project, We need to be resourceful, and have reference in hunting good project ico here.

[rachman mahesa]

Actually, if the bounty hunter doesn't like KYC. Of course before investing in the project it's better to ask first. For personal, I also often get scam projects. Bitcointalk can't do anything, because here we are participating in the project. If you are not sure that this project is in the future, of course do not participate in the project. So what to think about is ourselves, if you don't like KYC, you certainly don't have to participate, which requires KYC and if the project you are analyzing is a scam project, of course do not participate or promote the project.

[Farma]

I think in this case, it's very difficult to avoid a project scam. therefore, the IEO has now been developed, so that the people involved have a small risk in terms of scammers. in this case, I think we should really do research, so we can avoid getting involved with the project scammer.

[GunsLair]

It seems to me that the bitcointalk moderators have many of their work and they are not obliged to follow the projects in order to find out if it is scam or not. This forum is a platform where many people not only communicate, but also earn. And as in any business that concerns money, you need to take into account possible risks and rely only on your own strength.

[okala]

Bitcoibtalk is just a social media but a cryptocurrency social media and have no power to regulate any new projects, bitcoin is just a community and not an authority and at that bitcointalk moderators can not help to stop scam project all it has to do is to provide a platform for scam projects be reported with tangible evidence against them and warn every member of the community against them.

[Samuel4]

This is easier said than done. Forum Moderators work is already enormous. Bounty hunters should be able to do their own research and filter which bounty to do. But it is quite unfortunate that most bounty hunter don't even reject offers. Some would not even mind Spending $10 data to do $5 worth of bounty payment, all because of lack of research before enrolling. It's high time bounty hunter started doing research before diving in.

[pandanaran]

In my opinion, the purpose of KYC is good, it's just not guaranteed that the project is successful and most hunters don't like it because it's just a waste of time. So far I can judge for myself about KYC and hope that there will be changes in the future. From what we discussed, I hope to go to Moderator to pay more attention to the hunter.

[Runbitup]

I think in this case, it's very difficult to avoid a project scam. therefore, the IEO has now been developed, so that the people involved have a small risk in terms of scammers. in this case, I think we should really do research, so we can avoid getting involved with the project scammer.

of course because fraudsters will always be there even though the IEO is safe enough because fraudsters will always be there where there are advantages in it.
there is no perfect system so there is still a possibility for fraudsters to enter.